Alex Sobel MP: Climate Timeline

• Timeline
• Votes
• Speeches
• Tweets
• Contact

Alex Sobel's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Alex Sobel

• 31 Oct 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  Leeds is ready to deliver. The trust has already secured outline business case approval and planning consent, and has completed significant enabling works. The new hospital will be a net zero carbon building, designed to meet the highest standards of sustainability and digital innovation. This will not only improve the quality of care, but set a national benchmark for environmentally friendly and efficient healthcare infrastructure. I urge my constituency neighbour, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the Health and Social Care Secretary to ensure that the Leeds hospitals of the future project is given the priority that it deserves in the upcoming review of the new hospital programme. Leeds is ready to go. We have the approval, the plans and the commitment. We just need the green light to get on with it.

  Full debate: Income tax (charge)

• 26 Sep 2024: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Britain is back as a climate leader. That’s my message to our international partners at #ClimateWeekNYC Our world-leadin… [Source]

• 26 Sep 2024: Tweet

  RT @FCDOGovUK: We are ambitious at home and abroad on the climate and nature crisis. We are committed to tackling the climate crisis and m… [Source]

• 29 Aug 2024: Tweet

  This is great news. The Climate APPG which I vice-chaired last Parliament consistently opposed the development of Rosebank. Kudos to @Ed_Miliband for this decision and the impetus it will give us to decarbonise faster https://twitter.com/greenpeaceuk/status/1829051723194745235 [Source]

• 03 Aug 2024: Tweet

  There will be some choices and trade offs if we are going to get close to sticking to 1.5C warming. Deciding to take longer to decarbonise our electricity system isn’t one of them, this needs to happen by 2030. France has 419k km of overhead power lines and UK just 70k km. https://twitter.com/guardianeco/status/1819588040681312361 [Source]

• 15 Jul 2024: Tweet

  RT @guardianeco: Ed Miliband to lead UK negotiations at Cop29 climate summit https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jul/15/ed-miliband-lead-uk-negotiations-cop29-climate-summit?CMP=twt_a-environment_b-gdneco [Source]

• 11 Jul 2024: Tweet

  RT @serauk: This is the difference a @UKLabour Govt. makes on tackling the climate emergency! Not ideologically opposing legal judgements t… [Source]

• 01 Jul 2024: Tweet

  RT @rushanaraali: I have fought for action on climate change both here in the UK and in countries most affected by the climate crisis. Un… [Source]

• 18 Jun 2024: Tweet

  RT @emmaflint18: Mohammed is doing a fantastic job as @LSChildrenMayor working for positive change in our city on the climate emergency.… [Source]

• 12 Jun 2024: Tweet

  RT @TracyBrabin: I’m proud to support the Climate and Nature Bill ????   This new legislation will better help us to achieve our climate goals… [Source]

• 29 May 2024: Tweet

  I'm standing as the Labour and Co-operative candidate for Leeds Central and Headingley I will fight for: ✅ Renters and more social housing ✅ Public services for the people ✅ Protecting grassroots culture ✅ Tackling the climate emergency ✅ Permanent ceasefire in Gaza https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1795825244789493774/video/1 [Source]

• 16 May 2024: Tweet

  @EdmundGemmell @theclimateparty I chair the net zero appg so totally don’t miss that but this wasn’t the tweet for that! [Source]

• 15 May 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  Does the hon. Gentleman agree that people understand a lot more about the concept of net zero, and therefore combining net zero with nature loss is so important for bringing people emotionally on side?

  I thank the hon. Lady, who serves alongside me on the net zero all-party parliamentary group. She has foreshadowed what I was going to say next: nature is essential to the future of all, and yet environmental degradation occurs disproportionately in, or around, low-income areas where a high percentage of people of colour live. Our approach must ensure a thriving natural environment for all.

  We cannot decouple the crisis that the natural world faces from the economic crisis and the climate crisis. Economies are embedded in, rather than external to, nature. When we recognise that, it becomes blatantly obvious that depleting nature risks the health and wellbeing of everyone. What this demands, then, is a fundamental and transformational change of how we measure economic success. GDP does not take into account the depreciation of natural assets, despite the natural environment being the key decider of our future success. If we do not move into inclusive wealth measurement, we will continue running ourselves into the ground, destroying more and more of the natural environment. At their core, economies do not value the natural world and therefore cannot address biodiversity loss.

  Full debate: Biodiversity Loss

• 08 May 2024: Tweet

  I have decided to withdraw from the Politico Energy and Climate Summit next week, due to the involvement of Equinor. It was unclear that they were sponsors and I would not have accepted the invitation had their sponsorship been known. [Source]

• 30 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @JohnMarsham: Unbelievable that the Secretary of State for Energy and Net Zero has accepted money from the Global Warming Policy Foundat… [Source]

• 27 Apr 2024: Tweet

  @DaveRowntree @UKLabour @LibDems You should visit @biaco_energy great net zero business. I can arrange if you like! [Source]

• 24 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @ClimateAPPG: This morning @ClimateAPPG MPs met with @RichardHRBenyon to discuss: ????????UK priorities for @UNFCCC #COP29 and @UNBiodiversi… [Source]

• 23 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @zerohour_uk: ???? Alex Sobel MP: “It’s clear that we urgently need a new plan to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss. It’s zero ho… [Source]

• 22 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @BigIssue: Alex Sobel MP: 'We need a serious, long-term and science-led plan to tackle climate emergency' https://www.bigissue.com/opinion/alex-sobel-climate-nature-bill-nature-earth-day/ [Source]

• 19 Apr 2024: Tweet

  We’re facing a food crisis and so much food is flown in fuelling climate change and losing nutrients enroute There’s no silver bullet but vertical farming using renewables, waste heat & water blending farming and engineering is part of the solution Great to visit @jonesfood_co https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1781374028004864470/photo/1 [Source]

• 16 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @horton_official: UK accused of double counting £500m of aid to meet climate pledge https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2024/apr/16/uk-accused-of-double-counting-500m-overseas-aid-to-meet-climate-pledge?CMP=share_btn_url [Source]

• 09 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @guardianeco: England could produce 13 times more renewable energy, using less than 3% of land – analysis https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/09/england-could-produce-13-times-more-renewable-energy-using-less-than-3-of-land-analysis?CMP=twt_a-environment_b-gdneco [Source]

• 07 Apr 2024: Tweet

  RT @UNGeneva: Climate change is one of the greatest threats to human health. Solutions are known: reducing GHG emissions by phasing out fo… [Source]

• 19 Mar 2024: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: Our Chair @alexsobel kicks off our Unlocking Net Zero Investment industry roundtable in collaboration with the fantastic 3… [Source]

• 11 Mar 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  What we saw last week was a Budget with no vision, no plan for getting us to net zero, no plan to drive investment in renewables and low-emission technology, no plan to boost the roll-out of electric vehicles, and no plan for retrofitting homes. The British people deserve better than that.

  The windfall tax on oil and gas profits that the Government extended by one year until 2029 will raise an additional £1.5 billion, according to the Chancellor, as the tax, introduced in May 2022, raised £2.6 billion in its first year. Think what those billions could do if they were properly directed towards our net zero goal. The funds from the windfall tax could be ringfenced for renewable energy, fixing our grid, green skills training and securing the well-paid jobs of the future—our green transition—but they just disappear into a Treasury black hole.

  When will the Government end the absurd practice of subsidies for industrial-scale wood burning? We heard nothing about this in the Budget last week. Drax power station burns wood pellets imported from north America to produce energy. It has had a subsidy of £11 billion of taxpayers’ money, and it is considered a renewable energy power station. Drax depends on Government subsidies for its support. When Drax was a coal power plant, it emitted 10 million tonnes of carbon. In 2022, Drax, now burning wood, emitted 12 million tonnes of carbon. Drax is the UK’s biggest emitter of CO 2 . The funds that subsidise Drax could be redirected to funding genuinely green and renewable technology, but under this Government, these funds are fuelling the climate crisis.

  We Labour Members have a vision for Britain of a green sustainable energy future, and we have a plan to deliver it. Labour will introduce a proper windfall tax on the massive profits of oil and gas companies. In government, Labour will go further than the Conservatives and raise the windfall tax on oil and gas profits from 75% to 78% until 2029. A Labour Government will create a new national wealth fund, with £7.3 billion to be invested in the jobs that can rebuild Britain’s industrial strength. We will crowd in private investments in our ports, gigafactories and hydrogen, and protect our steel industry, which the Government have allowed to fail.

  Labour will create Great British Energy, a new publicly owned energy company that will champion green energy to give us real energy independence. Great British Energy will invest in and deliver projects in partnership with the private sector. With our commitment to an ambitious £8.3 billion capitalisation of Great British Energy, we will invest in clean, home-grown power, which will cut Britain’s energy bills. Great British Energy will invest in leading-edge clean energy technologies, such as floating offshore wind, hydrogen and tidal. Labour is committed to clean power by 2030, and will pioneer offshore tidal by fast-tracking at least 5 GW of capacity, more than doubling our onshore wind capacity to 35 GW, more than tripling solar power to 50 GW, and quadrupling offshore wind; our ambition is for 55 GW. We will also double the Government’s target on green hydrogen, so that there is 10 GW particularly for use in the steel industry.

  After 14 years of Conservative failure on climate change, Labour is ready to invest in Britain’s clean energy future. We are ready to make Britain a world leader on climate change, drive investment in renewables and low-emission technologies, transform our energy sector to lower our power bills, and create good clean energy jobs for Britain’s future.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions

• 4 Mar 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  Properly supporting our nation’s farmers is essential to meeting our nature and climate targets. The Government must do more to support our farmers to deliver more sustainable food production and implement environmental land management strategies. DEFRA’s agricultural transition plan is a step in the right direction towards a more resilient and prosperous agriculture sector that is capable of delivering sustainable food production while meeting nature and climate targets.

  The Conservatives’ Environment Act 2021 target on species abundance, which they were forced to concede because of Opposition amendments, promised only to “halt the decline” in species by 2030. Just halting the decline, or getting a net zero for nature, is not good enough. Our ambition is to be nature positive.

  Full debate: Farming

• 14 Feb 2024: Tweet

  RT @TracyBrabin: The climate emergency is real. We have committed to zero carbon by 2038. I need to hear from you to help us make it a rea… [Source]

• 10 Feb 2024: Tweet

  Then after returning first thing I see is the new Electric buses funded by @TracyBrabin and facilitated by @helenhayden01 Electrifying our fleet is a major step to achieving net zero A Labour Government, Mayor and Council will bring in franchising and zero carbon bus investment https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1756297613693825031/photo/1 [Source]

• 24 Jan 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  Hedges produce crops and provide food for people and animals. The protection and management of the natural environment is crucial for the agricultural sector and the environment, especially under the growing challenges imposed by the rise in temperature and the climate crisis, with continuing chaotic weather patterns. As a CPRE hedgerow champion—I am pleased that the hon. Member for North Devon mentioned us—I signed up to call on the Government to commit to significant hedgerow planting and restoration and to increase the extent of the UK’s hedgerows by 40% by 2050, as recommended by the UK Climate Change Committee. Under the nature recovery Green Paper, the Government have said that they are committed to protecting hedgerows, including through the ELMS scheme, but I would like to see them specify how they will encourage the creation of more.

  When I attended the convention on biological diversity —the UN biodiversity conference—at COP15, Governments agreed a new set of goals for nature over this decade. Unfortunately, the UK is one of the most severely nature-depleted countries worldwide, and we have heard successive Government Ministers admit that that is the case. The Natural History Museum’s biodiversity intactness index, probably the best indicator of global biodiversity, has revealed that the world has crashed through the “safe limit for humanity” for biodiversity loss and placed the UK’s 53% score in the bottom 10% of all countries, well below China and last in the G7—not a record that we should be proud of. The Conservatives’ Environment Act 2021 target on species abundance, which they were forced to concede by Opposition amendments, promised only to “halt the decline” in species by 2030. Just halting the decline—or getting a “net zero for nature”—is not good enough. Our ambition should be to be nature-positive, both at home and when working internationally. Going forwards, we need to focus on improving our rewilding, reforesting and biodiversity targets in which hedgerows are preserved, utilised and renewed.

  I am sure that my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) will tell us that Labour will take a different approach, which I will agree with. We need to be the change that we want to see. Action at home has showcased to the world how nature-positive policy can be practically delivered across Government. I am sure that my hon. Friend will tell us that Labour will have a robust, net zero and nature-positive test for every policy—we must do that now—and a green prosperity plan, with an investment of £28 billion in the latter half of the next Parliament, including funding for nature restoration. I hope that that green prosperity plan includes significant funding for the green skills needed for us to restore hedgerows and our nature-depleted environment.

  Full debate: Hedgerows: Legal Protection

• 23 Jan 2024: Tweet

  RT @ClimateAPPG: @CarolineLucas Additional drilling is causing not just a climate crisis but a nature crisis too - @alexsobel https://t.co/… [Source]

• 20 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @MayorOfWY: As climate change worsens, flooding events are becoming more common. Here in West Yorkshire, we’re acting now so we can mak… [Source]

• 09 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @fionaharvey: 11 ministers from UK have been at Cop28. And UK govt press office claim there’s been every opportunity to question them! W… [Source]

• 09 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @RSBenwell: UK Government's #COP28 #Nature day announcements. A speedy ????on the good and the gaps. The good: criteria published for the… [Source]

• 08 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @Sir_David_King: As I leave #COP28 today, I'm doing so by joining 800+ other leaders who are standing shoulder to shoulder with the COP… [Source]

• 06 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: We cannot forget about climate change, because of other crises. As we continue addressing the very serious wars happe… [Source]

• 06 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @daisydunnesci: NEW: Spain????????, Kenya????????, and Samoa???????? have just joined the @beyondoilgas alliance at #COP28, a small group of countries fo… [Source]

• 06 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @daisydunnesci: Sônia Guajara, Indigenous minister of Brazil, makes history today at #COP28 as the first Indigenous head of a delegation… [Source]

• 05 Dec 2023: Tweet

  The political consensus on climate is under severe strain but without honesty about both the benefits and challenges of the transition and also the risks of not decarbonising we will fail people. So it was a pleasure to speak on this panel at @COP28_UAE with global legislators https://twitter.com/globe_intl/status/1731886269108502709 [Source]

• 02 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @daisydunnesci: NEW: 7 countries have joined the Powering Past Coal Alliance today at #COP28 Including... US???????? Czechia???????? Kosovo???????? Cypru… [Source]

• 01 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Great to be at COP28 with @Keir_Starmer and @DavidLammy today. Our message to world leaders is that with a Labour governm… [Source]

• 01 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @horton_official: I watched the leader speeches at #cop28 and I believe we are the ONLY country to have a leader which used it as an opp… [Source]

• 30 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @cebill_now: Pledges, promises and declarations are broken with impunity—but laws are enforceable. So, after #COP28, remember: national… [Source]

• 27 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @algore: The chances for real progress at COP28 were badly damaged early this year when an oil company CEO was appointed to lead the neg… [Source]

• 27 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @CFigueres: This is the 'Volkswagen 2015' moment for the #COP28 Presidency.   Caught red handed, the COP Presidency has no other option… [Source]

• 24 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: Fossil fuels are the root cause of climate change, and impacts are felt everywhere, including here in Antarctica. I h… [Source]

• 24 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: I've come to Antarctica ahead of #COP28. Ice here is melting at record rates - raising sea levels & endangering lives… [Source]

• 22 Nov 2023: Tweet

  At the @ClimateCrisisAG Pre @COP28_UAE event: Hopeful Expectations. Eminent panel of Scientists and activists @Sir_David_King @lwhitmarsh @GabrielleWalk3r @farhanaclimate The need to ensure there are funds to repair climate damage and historical asymmetry front and centre https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1727397066505396298/photo/1 [Source]

• 16 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @MayorOfWY: ???? Join our Big Climate Chat to have your say on how we tackle the Climate Emergency! Share how it's affecting you, what cha… [Source]

• 14 Nov 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  The housing sector is on track to use almost 50% of the Climate Change Committee’s recommended carbon budget. That trajectory is unsustainable if we are to uphold our commitments under the Paris agreement and play our part in limiting global warming to 1.5°. We need homes fit for the future. The Government have now prioritised stepping up the pace of retrofitting, driving progress towards decarbonisation while providing much-needed assistance to our constituents during the cost of living crisis.

  Full debate: Economic Growth

• 10 Nov 2023: Tweet

  I've tabled the Climate & Ecology Bill amendment to the #KingsSpeech. It's never been more important to lock the UK's climate and nature commitments in law to reverse nature's destruction and deliver a just transition. Ask your MP to sign Amendment E https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/Document/82575/Html?subType=Standard#_idTextAnchor003 https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1722966959275266108/photo/1 [Source]

• 07 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @SiobhanADM: Some of our brilliant @ourANU Pacific Islander climate alumni scholars preparing for #COP28 by learning from the best. Than… [Source]

• 31 Oct 2023: Tweet

  Absolutely honoured to have been appointed to this prestigious position alongside Chris Climate Change is the defining issue of our time and we need all of the actors in society to work together to mitigate and adapt to the climate emergency so this series of seminars is crucial https://twitter.com/stantscollege/status/1719386379610648713 [Source]

• 27 Oct 2023: Tweet

  This week I joined @ClimateAPPG to demonstrate support for financing Loss and Damage at #COP28. I will be speaking up on this at COP and add my voice to those whose countries are at existential crisis like @RRegenvanu https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1717877278485446866/photo/1 [Source]

• 12 Oct 2023: Tweet

  RT @itvnews: Lord Nick Stern, a globally respected climate economist, has accused the UK government of being "flaky" on Net Zero. Respond… [Source]

• 12 Oct 2023: Tweet

  RT @ChiefExecCCC: Just published ???? New @theCCCuk snapshot assessment of the impact of recent climate announcements over an eventful few mo… [Source]

• 04 Oct 2023: Tweet

  RT @ChrisGPackham: Today I can share I'm challenging the PM on the legality of abandoning key Net Zero commitments I believe the timeline… [Source]

• 04 Oct 2023: Tweet

  RT @LeoHickman: The Pope has issued a blistering, lengthy attack on climate deniers – and what needs to happen at COP28 "a broad change in… [Source]

• 22 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: Climate change is not just a change in the weather. It is changing life on our planet. It is killing people and deva… [Source]

• 21 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @nationaltrust: We're deeply concerned about reports this morning of moves to water down key green policies around Net Zero and the impa… [Source]

• 21 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @MayorOfWY: It’s time for the job of delivering Net Zero to be devolved. By setting local targets, energy plans and with the access to… [Source]

• 20 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Rishi Sunak's panicked net zero speech is crumbling in the face of opposition from industry, the public, and his own MPs.… [Source]

• 19 Sep 2023: Tweet

  Why would you have confidence in someone who can’t keep any promises he makes especially when weighing short term political gains against long term industrial planning and the existential crisis of climate change https://twitter.com/politlcsuk/status/1704209643378200739 [Source]

• 15 Sep 2023: Tweet

  I visited a steel mill in Ukraine that has the capacity to be run entirely on green electricity, showing how a net zero mill creating steel for infrastructure projects can work. Ukraine can be an exemplar of the green transition even in the hardest circumstances. https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1702655287813910741/video/1 [Source]

• 13 Sep 2023: Tweet

  On my third day in Ukraine I visited a project full of hope A wind farm much of which was constructed after the invasion. Giving people power, decarbonising and guaranteeing energy security Quite a contrast with our Wind Farm Auction where the Govt failed to secure any new wind https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1701919253740290223/video/1 [Source]

• 12 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: Today the Net Zero APPG & our Chair @alexsobel visited the @atkinsglobal Lava Lab, a fantastic example of the #NetZero inn… [Source]

• 11 Sep 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  Afterwards, we visited a renewable energy project—a wind farm. There is an irony here in that half the wind farm was completed after the Russian invasion. Just last week we had a wind farm auction in the UK where nobody put in a bid. In Ukraine, however, they can somehow build them in the middle of a war. It is a part of Ukraine’s security strategy, and is not just about climate and transition. It is easy to take out a single power station, but much harder to take out a distributed network of wind or solar installations. Again, the UK and other partners need to support and invest, because this is not just about peace and rebuilding; it is about the war effort now.

  Full debate: Ukraine

• 08 Aug 2023: Tweet

  RT @UNEP: Climate change is a real and undeniable threat to our entire civilization. The effects are already visible and will be catastrop… [Source]

• 06 Aug 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: Protecting forests is one of the most effective ways to address the climate crisis. Forests can benefit the planet &… [Source]

• 02 Aug 2023: Tweet

  RT @LouHaigh: The transition to electric vehicles is essential to net zero, essential to growth and essential to the future of our automoti… [Source]

• 30 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: Heatwaves already kill thousands of people every year. Without sustained investments in climate mitigation & adaptati… [Source]

• 29 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: Asia is warming faster than the global average. A new @WMO report outlines how extreme weather & climate change impac… [Source]

• 29 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: The cost of living crisis can only be beaten by tackling the climate crisis. That’s what Labour’s Green Prosperity Plan w… [Source]

• 25 Jul 2023: Tweet

  What climate leadership looks like https://twitter.com/mayorofwy/status/1683788091641810949 [Source]

• 25 Jul 2023: Tweet

  Listening to @BBCr4today report on Peat Bog restoration in County Antrim and reminding us that Peat Bogs are our best carbon store on land. To meet our nature targets and reach net zero we must work hard to reverse our nature depleted nation on land and sea. [Source]

• 22 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @antonioguterres: Heat waves are becoming more frequent, more intense and longer – all due to the impacts of the climate crisis. #Clima… [Source]

• 19 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @CarbonBubble: Germany ???????? has cut GHG emissions faster than the UK since the 2015 #ParisAgreement, further undermining the Sunak govt’s… [Source]

• 18 Jul 2023: Tweet

  Great to hear @piersforster from @UniversityLeeds who is the Interim Chair of the @theCCCuk speak to our @NetZeroAPPG myth busting report ‘23 for 23’ https://twitter.com/alexsobel/status/1681281262516948995/photo/1 [Source]

• 05 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @serauk: Room set up and well underway for our event- How Labour can work with Pacific leaders to combat climate change? Speakers incl… [Source]

• 8 Jun 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  On World Ocean Day, we acknowledge this year’s theme of “Planet Ocean: tides are changing” as a call to intensify our efforts to understand, preserve and harness the power of our oceans. Our vast oceans hold the key to so much: biodiversity, marine ecosystems, climate change mitigation, food security, renewable energy and the future preservation of our planet. The role of our oceans in combating climate change is grossly underappreciated. More 70% of our planet’s surface is made up of ocean, which produces at least half of our world’s oxygen. Since 1978, the ocean has absorbed more 90% of the Earth’s increased heat and 40% of fossil fuel emissions, making it the world’s largest carbon sink. However, these watery giants are seldom acknowledged as active players in the fight against climate change. We need to draw focus to the power of blue carbon habitats, such as saltmarshes, seagrass meadows and mangroves. We heard extensively from other speakers on those issues.

  Full debate: World Ocean Day

• 25 May 2023: Tweet

  @cllrjesslennox Well done Jess. Lots to do on development, improvement and decarbonisation as well as affordability [Source]

• 24 May 2023: Tweet

  Pleased to be at the Net Zero Delivery Summit listening to a range of speakers on climate, nature & biodiversity. I’m interested in @bankofengland Governor’s view that its important we have clear standards, disclosures, regulation and transition plans. Government slow on this! https://x.com/alexsobel/status/1661308292990115842/photo/1 [Source]

• 18 May 2023: Tweet

  RT @MayorOfWY: How can the North lead the way towards decarbonisation in the UK? We discussed how infrastructure investment, reskilling,… [Source]

• 24 Apr 2023: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: "If the UK is to meet its net-zero target, it can’t rely solely on a handful of sectors doing all the heavy lifting. What’… [Source]

• 18 Apr 2023: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: We’re off! After our chair @alexsobel oversaw the a re-election of himself as chair and a new officer with @Wera_Hobhouse… [Source]

• 06 Apr 2023: Tweet

  RT @LabourOutlook: The fight against the climate crisis must be based on self-determination, human rights and environmental justice - @Chri… [Source]

• 21 Mar 2023: Tweet

  To get us on target to hit Net Zero and restore nature we need to ensure the right tree is in the right place with a Comprehensive Land Use Framework, a nature ready workforce and support for plant nurseries. A Labour Government will deliver for nature and the climate. [Source]

• 20 Mar 2023: Tweet

  RT @SiobhanADM: Ralph Regenvanu and Seve Paeniu: Pacific island countries are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, an… [Source]

• 10 Mar 2023: Tweet

  RT @IPUparliament: Vice-chair @BGIPU???????? MP @alexsobel reveals how @UKParliament made positive changes in response to the climate crises. Fr… [Source]

• 28 Feb 2023: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: @alexsobel, Chair of the Net Zero APPG closes the speeches. "It's about how cities can utilise the net zero agenda. It's… [Source]

• 1 Feb 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend sums it up perfectly. By leaving the European Union, we have removed ourselves from the constraints—the handcuffs—of the common agricultural policy. We have been able to develop a policy that, certainly in England, will translate into sustainable food production and improving the environment. The Lords are about to pass the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill—another Brexit freedom—which will allow us to develop climate change-resilient wheat. We can use the best of technology and our freedoms to do what is right for the farmers and people of this country, ensure that we have a healthy and wealthy farming community, and continue to enjoy all the fabulous produce for generations to come.

  Full debate: Environmental Improvement Plan 2023

• 24 Jan 2023: Tweet

  RT @NadiaWhittomeMP: Today my Climate Education Bill returns to Parliament. The climate emergency will affect every aspect of our society.… [Source]

• 11 Jan 2023: Tweet

  RT @JimfromOldham: We must fight to bring access to nature to every community. It’s essential in tackling the climate crisis and to live a… [Source]

• 09 Jan 2023: Tweet

  RT @guyshrubsole: Net zero possible in 2040s, says outgoing UK climate business expert “Given that we’ve now got California and Germany s… [Source]

• 02 Jan 2023: Tweet

  RT @zimmer_donna: We are in a biodiversity and climate crisis. Swanscombe Peninsula SSSI is no place for a theme park full stop! I support… [Source]

• 31 Dec 2022: Tweet

  RT @SiobhanADM: First--- I am really proud of my work as a Pacific negotiator on securing the loss and damage finance facility at COP27 thi… [Source]

• 28 Dec 2022: Tweet

  RT @UNBiodiversity: A massive amount of #GHG is emitted by the fashion industry every year, contributing greatly to #GlobalWarming. We need… [Source]

• 22 Dec 2022: Tweet

  RT @rach_parkes: Fossil fuel interests dominated at #COP27. But #COP15 was different. Hundreds of companies drowned out negative lobbying… [Source]

• 22 Dec 2022: Tweet

  RT @volker_turk: The climate crisis is a human rights crisis. That’s clear in the photo exhibit that marked #HumanRightsDay @UN in #NewYor… [Source]

• 19 Dec 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  However, I say to the hon. Gentleman that we already have established funding, with the nature for climate fund, and through the blue planet fund we have already undertaken a number of investments that will improve nature, not only in this country, but around the world. I am particularly thinking of Commonwealth countries, but this also applies to overseas territories and the south, to which he refers. That is why the importance of the £30 billion funding that will go in was discussed back and forth, and the UK was very happy to make sure that it got delivered. We recognise the need to ensure significant investment all around the world and that value is attributed to nature as much as it is to climate, if not even more so. Candidly, we can do as much as we like on tackling climate change, but if we do not preserve and restore nature, it will effectively be for nought. That is why we have put so much work into doing this. It is why, at COP27 in Egypt, our Prime Minister set out the importance of restoring nature, saying that it was critical in terms of tackling climate change. The hon. Gentleman may be aware of our environmental land management scheme. We have started the first phase of the sustainable farming incentive, and we will be announcing more early in the new year as we make the transition from the traditional European funding, which is effectively area-based—on how much land people owned—to farmers being paid for certain goods in order to improve the environment and reduce carbon emissions.

  I agree entirely with my hon. Friend. That is why it was important that when the Prime Minister went to Sharm el-Sheikh for COP27, building on our COP26 presidency where we included nature as a full day of the climate change conference, he referred specifically to the fact that £3 billion of the £11 billion total climate financing will be dedicated to nature. He recognises how critical it is, and we will continue to endeavour to improve the natural environment not only in this country, but around the world.

  Addressing biodiversity loss is an essential part of addressing climate change, but as with climate change, we see no sense of urgency or leadership in action from this Government. Does the Secretary of State accept that her Department’s failure to set targets for water quality or habitat protections in England undermined talks at COP15? She calls nature the “Cinderella of the story”, but Cinderella was never forced by the ugly sisters to swim in sewage. That achievement belongs to this Government.

  We have actually increased the amount of official development assistance going to environmental and climate change projects. I am excited about that. We will continue to see more money coming in from around the world, including from the private sector and philanthropic donors, to help achieve these ambitious aims. I am excited about the future decade.

  Full debate: Convention on Biodiversity COP15: Outcomes

• 19 Dec 2022: Tweet

  RT @horton_official: Transport is the source of most of our emissions yet there seems to be no ambition to decarbonise. Why won’t Departmen… [Source]

• 15 Dec 2022: Tweet

  Great initiative reflecting @UKLabour continued climate leadership and gives us opportunity to collaborate with @serauk and compete (and sometimes collaborate) with @CEN_HQ. This is the most important long term strategic issue and the more support we have the better https://twitter.com/LCEF_UK/status/1603301585005707264 [Source]

• 08 Dec 2022: Tweet

  Labour not only clearly opposes this coalmine but as climate leaders we wouldn’t, if in Government, allow this to go ahead. https://twitter.com/Ed_Miliband/status/1600556229021024291 [Source]

• 07 Dec 2022: Tweet

  Its not just bad its irresponsible and throws away all the Government’s gains on climate leadership. The future of hydrocarbons is to keep them in the ground otherwise there won’t be a liveable earth. https://twitter.com/StarkClimate/status/1600603757418582034 [Source]

• 02 Dec 2022: Tweet

  RT @AusHCVanuatu: Australia is taking real and significant action to achieve our ambitious climate goals. Discussed ???????? - ???????? collaboration… [Source]

• 1 Dec 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  Now, as we move towards reaching our net zero targets, we are in the danger zone of relying on incineration and not making the kind of progress on recycling rates that the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington alluded to in his remarks and on which the hon. Member for Keighley concluded his remarks. Millions throughout the country expect to see such progress.

  Full debate: Waste Incineration: Permit Variation

• 20 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: #COP27 has delivered an important step in recognising the consequences of the climate crisis for countries on its frontlin… [Source]

• 20 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @SiobhanADM: President of @COP27P describes the key achievement of #COP27 the ‘implementation COP’ as the #LossAndDamage facility, that… [Source]

• 20 Nov 2022: Tweet

  This year at #COP27 there was a much bigger focus on nature and forests and its gratifying to see this reflected in the final text. We now need to roll this forward to @UNBiodiversity #COP15 in Montreal starting in just 17 days https://x.com/alexsobel/status/1594262317717495808/photo/1 [Source]

• 18 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @JimfromOldham: Ahead of COP27 the Secretary of State announced that the Government would breach its own legal obligations for publishin… [Source]

• 18 Nov 2022: Tweet

  @BudBrewingUKI @NetZeroAPPG Thanks so much for a fascinating visit and to discuss pathways to net zero on energy, transport as well as reducing water use and approaches to nature. [Source]

• 12 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @hilaryjeune: Great to meet U.K. MPs @alexsobel @AnnaMcMorrin during #COP27 discussing climate action. @climatejsy @GovJersey https://t.… [Source]

• 12 Nov 2022: Tweet

  Yesterday at #COP27 it was a pleasure to meet a range of international politicians including @BenCardinforMD @DrEKMarfo @hilaryjeune @HJinapor and take part in the UK Delegation Remembrance Day event https://x.com/alexsobel/status/1591507558111580162/photo/1 [Source]

• 10 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @UKLabour: With @Keir_Starmer as PM, the UK will lead in tackling the climate crisis and reaching the goal of net-zero. Our Green Prosp… [Source]

• 09 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @KarenBell: Really good to see #Vanuatu’s new #Climate Minister @RRegenvanu before he departs for #COP27. Discussed partnerships on #Cl… [Source]

• 09 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @StephSpyro: It's finance day at #COP27! Activists at the entrance of the conference in Egypt chanting "What do we want? Climate financ… [Source]

• 08 Nov 2022: Tweet

  Last year at #COP26 I was Parliamentary Rapporteur I shortly head to #COP27  to handover to my Egyptian successor but we have failed to deliver At #COP27  I’ll be calling for serious climate ambition, a deal on loss and damage and fulfilling our promises on climate adaptation ???? https://x.com/alexsobel/status/1589973082621456385/photo/1 [Source]

• 08 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Rishi Sunak is a fossil fuel PM in a renewable age. This is the man who had to be dragged even to go to COP27, and who o… [Source]

• 07 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @SiobhanADM: Want to understand more about #HumanRights and climate change? #Indigenous #WestPapuan leader @BennyWenda is at #COP27 to d… [Source]

• 06 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @SiobhanADM: President of the #COP27 reading the agenda including:“Matters relating to funding arrangements responding to loss and damag… [Source]

• 02 Nov 2022: Tweet

  Really pleased to attend @NetZeroAPPG event on Greening the land and how we achieve Net Zero land use. Two great panels of experts from @CLAtweets @CPRE @SoilAssociation @Savills @wsp @BroadwayInit https://x.com/alexsobel/status/1587859137278492677/photo/1 [Source]

• 31 Oct 2022: Tweet

  RT @BGIPU: As a country highly vulnerable to climate change impacts, parliamentary leaders from #Madagascar ???????? held valuable discussions on… [Source]

• 31 Oct 2022: Tweet

  RT @PacIsLiving: Vanuatu’s Special Envoy for #climatechange with ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly. Vanuatu will ask the UN to support a… [Source]

• 28 Oct 2022: Tweet

  RT @DavidLammy: It is a monumental failure of leadership that @RishiSunak will not be attending #COP27. Only @UKLabour is serious about ta… [Source]

• 27 Oct 2022: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: This is a massive failure of leadership We were the COP26 hosts and now the UK PM will be missing in action What Rishi S… [Source]

• 22 Oct 2022: Tweet

  RT @UKLabour: Labour has a plan to cut bills, make the UK energy secure, grow our economy, and tackle the climate crisis. Only a Labour go… [Source]

• 02 Oct 2022: Tweet

  This is a must win election for our Natural Environment and Climate Change. Good luck to Lula and my friend @jaqueswagner who is working on the campaign and is a fearless champion of the Environment https://twitter.com/guardianeco/status/1575824568140574721 [Source]

• 27 Sep 2022: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: "Leeds City Council analysis shows the will be 40,000 green jobs by the end of decade and 70,000 by 2050. These are all j… [Source]

• 26 Aug 2022: Tweet

  RT @DanielZeichner: The supply of CO2 matters given its extensive use in food production. Yet the Govt is sleepwalking into another suppl… [Source]

• 14 Aug 2022: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Radical action on energy bills ✅ Insulate 19 million homes ???? Green energy sprint ☀️ Labour is the party of economic just… [Source]

• 21 Jul 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  These latest crises take place against the backdrop of the slow introduction of the ELM scheme—another big talking point among farmers, the NFU and the Country Land and Business Association at shows and elsewhere. The Government are phasing out direct payments, but were are seeing a significant gap between the ELM scheme’s introduction and direct payments being phased out. Farms could go to the wall if the scheme’s roll-out is not accelerated. This is another example of agriculture being pushed into a difficult place. If the Government continue to push ahead as they are, many farming businesses will go bust. This not only harms farmers, but undermines our efforts to reach net zero, which may force us to import more food, produce to lower environmental standards, and use more carbon to get it here.

  Many Government Members will be preoccupied over the summer by yet another Tory leadership election, but at agriculture and county shows, I fear people will be more concerned about the challenges facing British agriculture and food businesses. While the Government may be content to amble on without a plan, Labour pledges to provide agricultural communities with the support they need. On the ELM scheme, the Opposition support the NFU’s call for basic payment reductions to be paused for two years to provide more time for the scheme to be rolled out. We would reprioritise the ELM scheme to secure more domestic food production in an environmentally sustainable way, as part of our plan to support farmers to reach net zero. The shadow Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs team will be at shows all summer discussing these issues and offering solutions. I hope the Minister can offer us some now.

  Full debate: Agricultural and County Shows

• 20 Jul 2022: Tweet

  RT @EnvLeeds: Professor @piersforster: "Climate change is warming the land and ocean, and has brought extended drought conditions to much o… [Source]

• 20 Jul 2022: Tweet

  Confirms what @Ed_Miliband @theCCCuk and basically every Green Group have been saying and the plans are woefully insufficient to meet the ambitions https://twitter.com/DrSimEvans/status/1549417193523367937 [Source]

• 20 Jul 2022: Tweet

  RT @PaulBrandITV: Lots of debate about the costs of limiting climate change. But also have to factor in the costs of not limiting climate c… [Source]

• 16 Jul 2022: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Tonight we learn that even the Tories don't trust the Tories to tackle the climate emergency. Alok Sharma is right: the C… [Source]

• 03 Jul 2022: Tweet

  RT @jreynoldsMP: Labour’s plans will bring down bills, create jobs and help achieve net zero A Labour government will re-energise Britain’… [Source]

• 03 Jul 2022: Tweet

  RT @jreynoldsMP: Labour will re-energise our economy with good jobs and investment to meet our climate objectives We will create 30,000 j… [Source]

• 30 Jun 2022: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: "The whole point of the Net Zero APPG is to get to net zero as soon as possible ... The government needs to make this the… [Source]

• 29 Jun 2022: Tweet

  It was a pleasure to speak at the @theCCCuk and @NetZeroAPPG launch of the incredibly hard hitting progress report to Parliament Its clear from the report that current Government action means we won’t reach Net Zero. Its 619 pages are damning on the Government’s climate delivery https://x.com/alexsobel/status/1542208761158402048/photo/1 [Source]

• 29 Jun 2022: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: "Targets don't mean anything unless we have a delivery programme", says Lord Deben at a joint reception with the #NetZero… [Source]

• 27 Jun 2022: Tweet

  RT @alanwhiteheadmp: It's 3 years since the UK enshrined net zero into law. We know there is vast room for debate on how to get there, but… [Source]

• 9 Jun 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  We have had a broad range of excellent contributions. The hon. Member for Broxbourne (Sir Charles Walker) is a doughty defender of anglers and the need for clean water for angling. He will be pleased to hear that I have met the Angling Trust. My hon. Friend the Member for Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport (Luke Pollard), whom I was with in Plymouth just last week, called for greater accountability on the SPS and the need for more powers at Ofwat, and his points were well made. He is right about the lack of a clear plan for decarbonisation and nature restoration, and I commend him on his ambitious campaign to get Devil’s Point designated an official bathing water spot. Maybe one day I will be able to bathe in it with him. [ Interruption. ] In wetsuits—I hope people will not read too much into that.

  The hon. Member for Kensington (Felicity Buchan) made an important contribution on flooding, which, due to climate change, will be ever more frequent unless more action is taken, especially on upland catchments. My hon. Friend the Member for Brentford and Isleworth (Ruth Cadbury) gave an account of Mogden sewage treatment works discharging into the Duke of Northumberland’s river—one of too many such horrific events.

  Outside Parliament now, the heirs of Bazalgette are creating the super sewer, which will reduce sewage overflow into the Thames in central and east London—although not in west London past Hammersmith, a point my hon. Friend the Member for Brentford and Isleworth made. However, it is the only such project in the UK. When the House passed a motion declaring an environment and climate emergency three years ago, that should have challenged the water industry and the Government to undertake radical change. We can no longer accept being the dirty man of Europe.

  Full debate: Ofwat: Strategic Priorities

• 28 May 2022: Tweet

  RT @sidmanaktala: Here's 800,000 years of Earth's CO2 history in 30 seconds. We're in a #climateemergenecy. There is no time to wait. The… [Source]

• 27 May 2022: Tweet

  RT @UK100_: ???? Great to see our new Co-president @TracyBrabin, @MayorOfWY, highlighting the importance of locally-led #NetZero. ???? At UK100,… [Source]

• 24 May 2022: Tweet

  The effects of the #ClimateCrisis are hitting communities now. Climate is a present not future crisis https://t.co/8wahnHeuoM [Source]

• 24 May 2022: Tweet

  RT @EnvironmentAPPG: ????????#StandingUpForNature ???????? ????We must use #COP15 to challenge other countries to reinvigorate their @COP26 commitments a… [Source]

• 19 May 2022: Tweet

  RT @SamTarry: We need a transport system fit to tackle the climate crisis and work for the passengers and communities that rely on them. T… [Source]

• 17 May 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  In this Queen’s Speech, the Government are faced with the twin challenges of the cost of living crisis and a climate crisis, in a period when we are emerging from the greatest pandemic in 100 years. The times call for a big, brave response—a game-changing policy that makes energy secure, ensures rapid decarbonisation and weans us off gas. At the same time, with rising prices and stagnant wages, people need relief, especially on the most essential bills, including energy, water, housing and transport.

  Given the measures brought forward over the last few months and in this Queen’s Speech, it feels as though the Government abandoned COP26 as soon as the doors of the Scottish Event Campus were closed. It is not just individuals and families who face this crisis, but businesses, which have the highest cost pressures and the highest tax burden in 50 years. The Conservative party thinks it is the party of business, but the pandemic taught us that that is only the case if your chums own the business. The millions working in small and medium-sized enterprises who were not fortunate enough to go to school with a Cabinet Minister, or to run a Cabinet Minister’s local pub, get no help at all. It is the chumocracy response to a crisis.

  This Queen’s Speech provides not an ounce of relief for those struggling with costs and in dire need of a pay rise. To meet the challenge, we need an energy security Bill that takes a quantum leap in ambition, compared with what the Government have provided so far. I would expect, as a minimum, to see in the Bill a retrofit revolution, not a repeat of failed previous schemes such as the green homes grant. We need a serious delivery body to deliver adequate insulation for every building in Britain; serious funding for the sector; a mass apprenticeship programme; a stellar leap in decarbonisation, involving district heat and power, heat pumps and hydrogen; and an annual target for a reduction in household energy bills and real-terms carbon emission reductions. The future system operator needs to have real teeth to be able create a two-way smart grid that takes advantage of battery storage and home electricity generation.

  Full debate: Tackling Short-term and Long-term Cost of Living Increases

• 13 May 2022: Tweet

  Unfortunately for too many states climate change is something to think about once a year at COP then conveniently ignore anything inconvenient the rest of the year https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1525162708693159937 [Source]

• 27 Apr 2022: Tweet

  @jnigelscott @NetZeroAPPG Not a penny [Source]

• 20 Apr 2022: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: @alexsobel, Chair of the Net Zero APPG, kicks off our timely session on Net Zero Energy. https://t.co/54xmeNDyI4 [Source]

• 11 Apr 2022: Tweet

  RT @James_BG: Your periodic reminder that as the climate crisis escalates direct action protests were always inevitable. What exactly did y… [Source]

• 10 Mar 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  How bio- diversity and renaturing is undertaken in the UK will be guided by the convention on biological diversity. Biodiversity has experienced a catastrophic collapse globally. The United Nations biodiversity COP15 is shortly to resume. What are the Government’s strategic goals at COP15? What equivalent headline target is there to the net zero target at COP26, which is well understood in local urban communities and across the UK?

  Full debate: Biodiversity

• 13 Dec 2021: Vote

  Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 9 Dec 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  It is a pleasure to serve under you in the Chair, Mr Twigg. I refer to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I thank the hon. Member for Bath (Wera Hobhouse) for securing this important debate in our transition to net zero.

  I want to start by talking about a significant zero-emissions capability. When defining that capability, the Government must look to the spirit of their decision to phase out the sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles from 2030. Any vehicle that does not have the ability to run continuously, creating zero emissions, for a meaningful range is predominantly an internal combustion engine vehicle. To continue to allow the sale of such vehicles after 2030 is contrary to the Government’s own decision. Therefore, only vehicles with a chargeable battery and a plug should be included, not mild hybrids.

  The only suitable metric to measure that is miles of continuous zero-emission range, which should be set at a minimum of 100 miles, to ensure that consumers realistically make journeys on electric miles. There is no fundamental technological barrier that impedes plug-in hybrids from delivering higher ranges today. It is merely how to optimise the battery size of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle—or PHEV—to comply with today’s CO 2 regulations.

  We also need a zero-emission vehicle mandate, which is a target placed on car manufacturers to ensure a certain percentage of vehicles are zero-emission vehicles. Of course, the definition of that mandate is extremely important. California has had a working version of such a mandate and has in fact had a ratchet mechanism to get more lower carbon vehicles on to the road since 1990.

  In the pure form of a ZEV, only vehicles capable of zero-tailpipe emissions should be included, so battery electric or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, but, from a more pragmatic standpoint, plug-in hybrid vehicles could be included, but given a value reflective of how far they can drive on zero emissions. California includes BEVs—battery electric vehicles—PHEVs and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. If 20% of a vehicle’s stated range is electric, it should be a awarded a 20% value. That would be a reasonable level in the mandate.

  The Government have announced that the ZEV mandate will start in 2024. Any target will need to be ambitious, yet achievable. Looking at the industry’s own projections, SMMT figures for its high uptake scenario for 2024 are around 35% of zero-emissions vehicle sales in that year. The industry could meet that target, but it needs incentives. Funnily enough, it happens to roughly correlate to the Climate Change Committee’s figure for 2024. That Committee recommends that 50% of new sales should be zero-emissions vehicles in 2025, meaning a steep gradient in the Government’s mandate.

  A zero-emissions vehicle mandate is a supply-side tool, but a fleet mandate is the demand-side tool. The Government could look to create a fleet mandate to ensure that there are targets for fleet vehicles. The sector is around 55% of the marketplace in the UK and provides an important feeder to the second and third-hand market. Given that there is a favourable taxation treatment for this marketplace, a mandate could help drive uptake. The fleet mandate would need to be significantly higher than the zero-emissions vehicle mandate. We need to remember that fleet vehicles enter the used-vehicle market three to five years after becoming fleet. It will mean affordable, zero-emissions vehicles by 2030. My hon. Friend the Member for Vauxhall (Florence Eshalomi) touched on affordability. Everybody should be able to afford a zero-emissions vehicle by 2030.

  I will finish by talking about plug-in grants. The price gap between zero-emissions vehicles and internal combustion engines continues to reduce, but there is still a significant differential. Many people are asking for an extension to the plug-in car grant. I would support that, but I ask the Government to also look at an alternative: the bonus-malus. The operation of a malus or levy is placed on the purchase of new fossil-fuel vehicles, and this is used to fund a bonus or grant for zero-emissions vehicles, meaning that it is neutral for the Government and does not require state funding.

  Full debate: Electric Vehicles: Transition by 2030

• 8 Dec 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Does my hon. Friend agree that the commute from Bradford to Leeds, or from Bradford to Manchester, puts more cars on the road and does not help us to meet our COP26 obligations?

  Most concerning is the broken promise of new stations in Leeds and in Bradford. Faster and more regular services require more platform space, and Leeds is already at capacity. Without extra capacity, will my constituents who use the Harrogate line have their services cut? I would like the rail Minister to answer that question. On the electrification of the Harrogate line, the recent Network Rail transport decarbonisation network strategy includes a recommendation for electrification between Leeds and Harrogate. Will that come forward?

  Full debate: Rail Investment and Integrated Rail Plan

• 2 Nov 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  It is not just business rates, however. The Chancellor’s Budget failed to make any mention of retaining the current VAT rate for tourism and hospitality businesses in the UK, an ignorant oversight which serves only to compound the struggles that the tourism industry and holidaymakers in the UK are currently enduring. It is also about climate action. Supporting domestic tourism means fewer people flying longer distances. Make no mistake, the cut to air passenger duty on domestic flights is not about supporting British tourism or British tourists. It is not ordinary people who take unnecessary short-haul flights in the UK, but business executives and occasionally the Prime Minister, who, it transpires, is flying back from COP26 in Glasgow to London, rather than taking the train like the rest of us.

  The Government claimed to support business, promised to deliver recovery and committed to net zero emissions, but—I apologise for what is now a tired cliché—actions speak louder than words.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions

• 21 Oct 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  I know we are talking about the Climate Change Committee, and I could quote Lord Deben at length, but I will start by quoting Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief scientific officer, whom we have seen many times during covid:

  “Only rapid and drastic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in this decade can prevent…climate breakdown”.

  He is obviously the chief adviser to the Government in this area, aside from the Climate Change Committee.

  The proof of the pudding is in the eating, and as we found out from “The Great British Bake Off”, baked goods that look great do not always taste great. That is the test for the Government. This week they have published their net zero strategy, with so many accompanying documents and reports that I have not had time to read them, so the Minister might be correcting me and others at the end of the debate because there is an answer to our questions. However, while things have looked good for a while, they have not tasted good, because the delivery is not there.

  I will talk about the role of local government. Before I was elected to this place, I was the lead on climate change sustainability for Leeds City Council for a number of years. We started doing some great, groundbreaking work, but we could not complete some of those initiatives, because of Government policy and intervention, which stopped us in our tracks. Let me give two examples.

  There are big gaps. First, local authorities do not have the staff to do the work because of year-on-year Government cuts. We are not talking about local authorities’ statutory duties; we are talking about local authorities having set net zero dates themselves. The earliest one I heard was Nottingham’s, which was 2028. Leeds’s was 2030, and I think Manchester’s and Bristol’s were the same.

  Yes. So a lot of local authorities have quite short time periods to deliver net zero. They are not hamstrung by their own actions, but by Government actions. I hope that in the documents released this week there will be answers to local authorities’ questions.

  Does my hon. Friend share my concern that the Government have not reached out to leaders in the city regions ahead of COP? We know that on day 11 of COP there is a city regions day, but the Mayor of Bristol told me that there has been no discussion with Bristol, which is at the forefront of trying to introduce measures to get us to net zero. There seems to be a lack of communication between the Government and the people in charge of delivering the policies on the ground.

  I completely agree that metro Mayors have been an afterthought in terms of COP. My first COP was in Paris and I went, before we had a metro Mayor, as the lead representative. The French Government and the Mayor of Paris put on a huge set of events and incorporated cities from around the world. Given the issues that were emerging in the United States at that point, it was decided that the real deliverers of climate change measures on the ground would be cities and regions. The Paris COP was just after the election of Donald Trump. Thankfully, we are through that period now and we have a President of the United States who wants to take serious climate action.

  What do the Government need to do to support local authorities? For a start, what we are seeing now, in terms of the Climate Change Committee, is five-year carbon budgets. As we have seen, we are not on track to meet the fourth and fifth carbon budgets. We will wait until the Climate Change Committee reports to see whether it says that, with the new plans, we will now meet those budgets; I still think that we will fall short of meeting them, because we have lost so much time. Because time is so acute—for local authorities, we are talking about timeframes of seven, eight, nine or 10 years to get to net zero—we need a practical framework for annual carbon budgeting, and we need to have shorter periods for measuring it.

  We do not have a good enough planning framework to meet our net zero obligations, and those need to become non-negotiable. When the planning Bill is brought forward, I hope that that is where the Government will take it and that they will not, once again, lean in to the volume property developer community, which wants to do the absolute minimum. That community has really influenced the Government twice already: once when we had the code for sustainable homes, which was introduced in 2009-10 but scrapped as soon as the coalition Government came in; and then towards the end of the coalition Government, when the zero carbon homes initiative was also scrapped after the 2015 general election. We have lost 11 years on this issue; we cannot afford to lose any more time just because volume house builders cannot meet their climate obligations. They have had 11 years; they should have caught up. In every other European country, such developers have caught up, including in Holland, Belgium, Germany and Denmark. They need to catch up in the UK.

  It is not good enough that we are still building homes without alternative fuel systems and saying that we will retrofit them in 2035. How much more will it cost us to retrofit those houses, rather than building them now with an adequate low-carbon heating system? Local authorities also need access to net zero funding streams to meet their own obligations, or the Government’s obligations, around net zero.

  The other area, and the most important thing, is that we do not have an end-to-end green industrial strategy, which means that people do not know exactly where they fit into the net zero pathway and the roadmap. All the Government’s ambitions and targets need to fit into an industrial strategy so people know how everything works. Germany has an industrial strategy; the UK does not seemingly have one now. If the Government have published a really good one this week, I apologise to the Minister and he will tell us all about it at the end.

  I thank the hon. Member for South Cambridgeshire again. I hope we can get this right and we can get an international agreement right at COP26. The climate and climate science will not compromise with us. This is not a political problem that we can negotiate with another country; this is a problem that is based on science, and science will not wait.

  Full debate: Climate Change Committee Progress Report 2021

• 23 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Chief Raoni’s biggest ask is to make indigenous lands protected reserves, with not just legal protection but security and human rights defenders on the ground, supported by us in the international community. However, the demarcation process is threatened under President Bolsonaro, who is a right-wing populist climate change sceptic who continues to open the door of protected lands to mining and agribusiness.

  Immediate action is so important as the climate crisis picks up speed and temperatures steadily rise. The lungs of our planet are burning. The Amazon rainforest is at a tipping point. Droughts and wildfires are now the norm, with 2021 set to be a particularly bad year. Just yesterday, an international study led by the University of Leeds warned that huge areas in the eastern part of the Amazon face severe drying by the end of the century if action is not taken to curb carbon emissions.

  Under Bolsonaro, we have seen record levels of deforestation, with an area seven times greater than London destroyed last year alone. Crucially, the Amazon may begin to contribute more greenhouse gases to the air than it absorbs by 2050, or possibly even sooner if the expansion of this work under Bolsonaro continues. His predecessor President Lula brought in protections that we saw work, and the rainforest loss was curbed. However, that work has all been undone in quite a short space of time. Now the Brazilian Government are pushing laws to make deforestation easier.

  Just as a virus born in one country can sweep across the globe, deforestation of the Amazon has the capacity to devastate not just Brazil, but the entire world. While Brazil acts as the primary custodian, maintaining the rainforest should not solely fall on their shoulders. Internationally, we must reflect critically as to how we consume the planet’s resources. COP26 will be a pivotal moment to focus on efforts to protect the Amazon rainforest and tackle unnecessary deforestation, with Brazilian representatives right here on our own shores.

  Full debate: Deforestation in the Amazon

• 10 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend the Member for Brentford and Isleworth (Ruth Cadbury) was right that France and other countries have put climate conditions on support for the aviation industry. We need more support, but conditional support, for net zero, and our Government did not make those conditions. They talk loudly on net zero but are failing to deliver. My hon. Friend the Member for Lewisham East (Janet Daby) is a doughty defender of her constituents’ health, especially on noise and air quality, and she is right that we need to look again at flight paths over cities, including hers and mine. The hon. Member for Thurrock (Jackie Doyle-Price) called for support for shipping and cruising. She is right that the multi-nation aspect of cruises going from country to country means that the chaotic handling of the traffic light system makes it impossible for them to restart. The Minister needs to take her points on board.

  Full debate: Aviation, Travel and Tourism Industries

• 07 Jun 2021: Vote

  Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 26 May 2021: Vote

  Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 16 Mar 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  I want to touch briefly on the impact that climate change is having on our historic churches. Higher rainfall is causing damage to timber and stonework, and stronger winds are causing more frequent damage to roofs, towers and spires. One of the greatest threats to church buildings is termites, which are likely to become a real problem in the coming years as Britain’s climate becomes ever more accommodating for them, as we have already seen in France. We have seen northward migration of animals that usually live in the UK. The Government must consider these new threats to our heritage and act accordingly.

  Full debate: Draft Grants to the Churches Conservation Trust order 2021

• 3 Mar 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  This Budget is made in the context of the UK having the worst economic performance during covid of any major economy and the highest death toll per capita. The Government have failed to protect the nation’s health or its economy. However, as the chair of the net zero all-party group, I have called for an infrastructure bank and, as a Leeds MP, I have called for that to be in Leeds, so I am pleased that one thing that I have lobbied for has come to fruition. My experience on the Environmental Audit Committee in looking at the performance of the Green Investment Bank, sold to Macquarie in 2017, means that I will scrutinise the detail of the bank’s capitalisation, mission and governance very closely to ensure that it supports net zero and biodiversity, and is not greenwash.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation

• 26 Jan 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  House building, along with everything else that we do, needs to align with the UK’s binding obligations in the Paris climate accords and carbon-efficient obligations, as well as the Government’s justified world-leading commitment to net zero by 2050. To do that, we need carbon-efficient housing solutions, and that implies a focus on cities as opposed to suburban and rural development. If we do not get that carbon-efficient housing in this Bill, as mandated by this new clause, then can we look at it for the housing Bill?

  I welcome this Bill, but can we please look at the legal requirement for the most carbon-efficient housing in the most carbon-efficient locations, not only for our climate change commitments but for quality of life in cities, in suburbs and in rural areas?

  Like other Members, I am disappointed that the Government have failed to make significant progress with this Bill, especially given the urgent need to act to address not only the causes of climate change but biodiversity loss. In such an important year for climate change mitigation and adaptation, I hope that the Government will make a meaningful effort to get the Bill on to the statute book as soon as possible in the next Session.

  I hope that new clause 9 will also draw attention to an equally pertinent issue: the offshoring of our emissions and associated resource consumption. WWF believes that as much as 46% of the UK’s carbon footprint is not currently accounted for by national reporting or included in the UK’s net zero target. This simply must be addressed if we are serious about our role in tackling climate change.

  I am grateful for the opportunity to take part in this debate. As my hon. Friend the Member for Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport (Luke Pollard) on the Opposition Front Bench said, the delay in the Bill’s progress sends a terrible message in view of the climate emergency. Now that we have left the EU, it is vital that we maintain the highest environmental standards, but this Bill replaces the EU’s comprehensive environmental protections with targets that the Secretary of State has near discretion to change at any time. That is why the amendments in this group are so important in seeking to maintain the independence of the OEP, placing duties on public authorities to act in accordance with key environmental principles, and enhancing protections for biodiversity. That is so important and is why we on these Benches support these amendments.

  Full debate: Environment Bill

• 13 Jan 2021: Vote

  Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 12 Jan 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  The incineration of waste with energy recovery is slightly preferable to waste being incinerated without any energy recovery or sent to landfill, but without carbon capture and storage technology I cannot in good conscience support it. I admit that the Government are investing in CCS, but we have no full-scale working models. Without trying to pre-empt what will be said by my neighbour, the hon. Member for Keighley (Robbie Moore), I am sure he will touch on the campaign started by his predecessor against the proposal for an incinerator there. He has my sympathy and support on that, and I think he knows that—we have discussed it previously on the train.

  At COP24, which I attended two years ago in Poland, Sir David Attenborough warned delegates that

  “we are facing a man-made disaster of global scale. Our greatest threat in thousands of years: climate change. If we don’t take action, the collapse of our civilisations and the extinction of much of the natural world is on the horizon.”

  Full debate: Waste Incineration and Recycling Rates

• 25 Nov 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  The lack of concrete and enforceable environmental and sustainable provisions is another real concern of mine. This deal was a golden opportunity to outline and to aspire to establish world-leading practices as both countries work to reduce their carbon emissions to zero by 2050, and to lay the groundwork for COP26 in Glasgow. How many golden opportunities on the climate are the Government prepared to squander in the run-up to COP?

  Full debate: UK-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement

• 17 Nov 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  I thank the hon. Member for Thirsk and Malton (Kevin Hollinrake) for securing the debate on this vital subject. In 2019, the business sector accounted for 18% of total carbon emissions. It is one of the biggest contributors of greenhouse gas, along with energy production and transportation. SMEs make up 99% of firms and 61% of the private sector workforce, and contribute £2.2 trillion in turnover, which makes them indispensable to the UK economy. They are extremely innovative, generate vast amounts of employment, and deliver economic prosperity and social cohesiveness. They are also disproportionately present in deindustrialised areas, and therefore present a unique opportunity to build back better.

  It is not just a matter of businesses that have a sole environmental focus. Many are leading the way in taking steps to make their businesses more environmentally friendly. A recent opinion poll found that more than half—54%—of SMEs said that they had taken steps to green their business in the past 18 months. When asked whether the transition to a green economy would be financially positive or negative for their business, 61% were optimistic, and just 8% said that the overall impact would be likely to be negative, on balance. Participants pointed to net zero legislation, the ongoing war on plastics, climate activism movements and the green recovery movement as drivers of the transition, so SMEs are rising to the challenge. There are huge benefits and opportunities in the transition.

  Those are all opportunities for SMEs, but many SMEs will come out of the pandemic burdened with debt, as the hon. Member for Thirsk and Malton said. To contribute to a net zero transition, they will require capital investment and business support. It is important that the Minister responds to my question about what support SMEs will be given to ensure that they have appropriate information, incentives and targets to be able to pull together to contribute to our collective ambition of net zero. What business support will they receive and, as the hon. Gentleman said, what financial support and investment can they receive?

  As the chair of the all-party parliamentary group on net zero, I want to finish by talking about our action plan, which looks at building an expansive and ambitious covid-19 green recovery package that focuses on green job creation and workforce retooling, especially in disadvantaged areas. That includes looking at the growth of solar installers and the reintroduction of the feed-in tariff. Decarbonisation through heat pumps, electric heating or hydrogen would also present opportunities for SMEs as installers. All those things present a huge opportunity to create new SMEs and new jobs within them, but they need the business support, investment, incentives and targets, and an ecosystem that creates the opportunity for net zero for SMEs and business at large.

  Full debate: SMEs and the Net Zero Target

• 16 Nov 2020: Vote

  Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 12 Oct 2020: Vote

  Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 29 Sep 2020: Vote

  United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 17 Mar 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  Amendment 82 would insert the phrase, “interim targets are met.” That would effectively place a duty on the Secretary of State to meet the interim targets that they set. In that context, it is no different from the provisions of the Climate Change Act, which I keep repeating as an example for us all to follow. Indeed, how the five-year carbon budgets work is an example for all of us to follow. They were set up by the Climate Change Act effectively as interim targets before the overall target set for 2050, which is now a 100% reduction; it was an 80% reduction in the original Act.

  Those five-year targets are set by the independent body—the Committee on Climate Change—and the Government are required to meet them. If the Government cannot meet them, they are required to take measures to rectify the situation shortly afterwards. Therefore, there are far better mechanisms than those in the Bill to give interim targets real life and ensure they are not just exercises on a piece of paper.

  I will be very brief. I entirely support what my hon. Friend says about the need for interim targets. We have seen how the carbon budgets work under the Climate Change Act. There is real concern that the timetable might be slipping and that we might not manage to meet the commitments in the next couple of carbon budgets, but at least there is a mechanism.

  The shadow Minister rightly referred back to the Climate Change Act and the five-yearly carbon budgets, as did the hon. Member for Bristol East. He asked why, if the carbon budgets were legally binding, the interim targets are not. That is a good question, but of course the targets in the Environment Bill are quite different from carbon budgets. Carbon budgets relate to a single metric: the UK’s net greenhouse gas emissions. These targets will be set on several different aspects of the natural environment.

  Full debate: Environment Bill (Sixth sitting)

• 05 Feb 2020: Vote

  Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 15 Jan 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  Politics, as we know, is a conversation about who we are and what is important. I am glad that so many colleagues across the House have come together today to highlight the importance of passing a liveable planet to our children. The UK can stand by its record of passing the first ever Climate Change Act under the last Labour Government and, more recently, the net zero commitment under this Government. I am thankful that, in this country, there is a broad consensus on the principle of the climate emergency. For some time, the climate emergency will be the greatest threat multiplier that we face. For our country, for our way of life and for generations to follow, we can and must do all we can to tackle that threat and build a smarter, greener and more equitable world as we do so.

  What concerns me is that the Government are knowingly under-delivering on their own climate action. We have a climate gap between our rhetoric in this House and our action in this country, and this Queen’s Speech does little, if anything, to fill that gap. The point has been repeatedly made by Conservative Members in the short time since the new year, in the build-up to the COP26 climate change conference in Glasgow, that this is a priority for them. That is all well and good, but as Greta Thunberg likes to say: action, not words. It is actions that the planet needs.

  First, there is no mention in the Queen’s Speech of lifting the ban on onshore wind in England, but there should be. Polling proves that many communities are keen to invest in wind technology, so that they can benefit financially, bringing the community together and increasing local opportunities. Onshore wind is also one of the cheapest renewable technologies. By effectively banning it, this Government are making decarbonisation more expensive by approximately £50 per household.

  Finally, I would like to touch on the big climate change event of this year, COP26. A huge diplomatic effort will be required, especially with the United States, to bring everyone constructively to the table. The UK must have addressed its climate gap by then and have its own house in order if we want to command any kind of presence, authority or respect at that conference and have a hope of delivering the kind of breakthrough moment that we had in Paris in 2015, when I was present as the lead councillor for climate change on Leeds City Council. Make no mistake: the Paris agreement is a high bar, and I have yet to see evidence that this Government will achieve a comparable breakthrough.

  The Secretary of State and the previous Member for Devizes, Claire Perry—now COP president—are aware of the good work of the Powering Past Coal Alliance. I urge him to extend an invitation to all countries, especially those that are still considering investment in new coal-fired power stations, particularly using UK Export Finance credit, that they might join this alliance, and that we might provide them with whatever assistance they require for the transition from coal to renewables. I also urge him and his counterparts to consider a “net zero club” of countries that have committed to join the UK in increasing their ambition, with legislation, not just to reduce their emissions but to bring them down to zero, and to consider getting that number to include every nation at COP. Having that global net zero commitment will achieve an agreement of the type that we saw in Paris, and will create a net zero goal for the entire planet—but only if the UK can deliver our own end and fill that gap between now and November, when COP takes place in Glasgow.

  Full debate: A Green Industrial Revolution

• 17 Oct 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  The Committee on Climate Change—the Government’s own advisers—wrote recently that the Government had completed only one of their 25 headline policy actions, and on 10 of them they had not even made partial progress. The report goes on to say that the policy gap has widened and the Government are going backwards. The Government have no right to be complacent, given that they are going to miss their own climate change targets. We are scientifically sure that this will cost millions of lives globally.

  Full debate: The Climate Emergency

• 10 Jul 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  I am pleased to see the Prime Minister is wearing green. I hope it is not merely a greenwash, as I welcome the Government legislating for net zero by 2050. Before they did that, when the target was weaker, the Committee on Climate Change had already reported that they would miss their target, and today it says that the

  Full debate: Engagements

• 25 Jun 2019: Vote

  Delegated Legislation — Value Added Tax - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 24 Jun 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  I welcome this statutory instrument, but have to say that although it is necessary it is insufficient. The Government lack ambition in this area; an 80% reduction on 1990 levels and a 2050 date are not the levels of ambition that I would expect if we are to avert catastrophic climate change. This is not net zero; this is net zero-lite.

  On housing, the code for sustainable homes was set up by the last Labour Government but scrapped by the coalition. We have had eight wasted years with houses being built to poor standards that will not meet our carbon budget targets under the Paris agreement. And where is the onshore wind? I want the Minister to commit today to returning onshore wind.

  However, I will finish on a positive note. I acknowledge that the UK has been a climate leader for the last 25 years or more and that that is reflected in our being awarded the COP 26 conference in 2026, which my right hon. Friend the Member for Doncaster North (Edward Miliband) referred to earlier. I wrote a letter with the hon. Member for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland (Mr Clarke) on this matter, and I welcome the conference coming here, but I want it to be a net zero COP. I want to see Britain having a real net zero strategy and leading the world on net zero, not just this net zero-lite that we have been presented with today.

  Full debate: Climate Change

• 22 May 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  The physical impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels and increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, will pose increasing economic risks for a range of businesses and investments, from food and farming to infrastructure, homebuilding and insurance. In the UK alone, climate change is projected to increase the risk that business assets and operations are damaged and disrupted by flooding, degrade some of our most productive agricultural land, to reduce water supplies, to increase the frequency and intensity of heatwaves, and to stress transportation, energy and water infrastructure. There are a great many risks for investors to consider.

  For instance, climate change may result in liability risks when those who suffer losses as a result of climate change take legal action to recover damages from those who can be found responsible. For example, the city of New York is currently seeking to recover costs from BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Shell as a result of flooding. Transition risks could also be faced by companies in high-carbon sectors that fail to diversify and adapt to policies introduced in response to the Paris climate change agreement. Firms that do not make a timely transition and remain over-invested in climate-changing activities could face costly regulatory action, suffer reputational damage, or see their assets become stranded as carbon prices rise. Our inquiry found several examples of stranded assets, such as oil refineries or fracking infrastructure. A Bank of England paper published in 2016 warned that

  Our Committee heard about a range of worrying practices in the pension industry, including the fiduciary duty of pension scheme trustees often being misinterpreted as a duty to maximise short-term returns; remuneration for investment consultants and fund managers encouraging a pursuit of short-term returns rather than long-term value creation; and a tendency to under-invest in physical assets, technology innovation and employees’ skills in preference for nearer-term gains from financial mergers, acquisitions or restructuring. In the context of our climate change risk, we want none of those things.

  It is really good to hear hon. Members talk about climate change and greenhouse gases, but there are in fact nine planetary boundaries, of which greenhouse gases are one. I wonder whether people understand that it is entirely possible that we save the planet from climate change yet kill ourselves through eight of the other planetary boundaries, two of which we are in the red for. Is it not the case that financial markets, pension schemes and so on actually need to see their remit as wider than just greenhouse gases, also covering a range of other areas, including biodiversity and carbon?

  Absolutely. A range of factors, including air quality and the insect population and pollinators, should be taken into account. It is not just about fossil fuels, but as the debate mainly concerns fossil fuels and climate change, I will concentrate on those. I recently led a debate on insect populations. It is good that we are looking at all of that in the round.

  Full debate: Pension Funds: Financial and Ethical Investments

• 1 May 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  The IPCC said we had until 2030 to avoid a 1.5° rise in global temperatures. We must get to net zero carbon by 2030 at the latest, not by the Government’s target of 2050. How do we get there? What must be done? First, we need to repurpose the Treasury and economic policy. In the short term, all Government spending, priorities and programmes should be assessed against our climate goals. The next spending review needs to be a climate emergency spending review. Too little of Government spending is on climate change priorities. By contrast, 25% of the EU’s budget for 2021-27 will be climate related.

  Finally, we need a new climate economics. The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate concludes that the choice between tackling climate change and boosting economic growth is a false choice. Instead, it says that economic growth and reducing emissions are mutually beneficial. Fitoussi, Stiglitz and Sen, three of the best economists in the world, have done substantial work for the French Government to measure societal wellbeing in ways that go beyond traditional measures such as an economy’s GDP. The UK Government need to look at measures that supersede gross domestic product and focus on solving our climate emergency.

  Full debate: Environment and Climate Change

• 20 Mar 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  If we are fighting a war against climate change—we should be under no illusion that we are experiencing a climate emergency—insects are on the frontline of the battlefield and humans are just another species in the war. We are the most intelligent soldiers fighting the war, however, and we cannot expect insects to know that their fields are being built on or that their farmer is using nitrates. We know that our actions are causing the disruption to their ecosystem.

  There is a massive depletion of insects, in relation to biomass and abundance. Some studies also show a loss of variety. Most people born by 1980 will perceive that, because 25 or 30 years ago, on a long summer car journey, the windscreen would be full of winged insects. That is now minimal. Why do we need abundance, biomass and a variety of insects to ensure a healthy planet? We need abundance and biomass to support the production of food and water, and to support nutrient cycles and oxygen production. We need variety because that ensures that if a single insect species becomes extinct, we will retain sufficient diversity. New varieties may be able to cope with climate change and other challenges that humans and the planet provide. Studies have most clearly documented the loss of abundance and biomass, which has mostly been caused by land use change for agriculture, the intensification of agriculture, and the application of pesticides, herbicides and novel chemicals in the environment.

  This is a crucial debate. Is my hon. Friend aware of the work of Professor Jane Hill, who has been mapping the northward progress of butterflies as the climate changes? They are such a sensitive indicator of the pace of climate change in our country.

  The UK does not have the sort of resilience that is needed to assist insects in weathering the storm of climate change. In a global assessment, the UK came 189th out of 218 countries for “biodiversity intactness”.

  I praise my hon. Friend to the rafters for securing this debate, because it is quite clear to many people that it would be entirely possible for this country and this planet to save ourselves from climate change, yet destroy ourselves in myriad other ways that breach the other eight planetary boundaries. Picking up on that, does he agree that it is the world’s poorest—both internationally and domestically—who will be disproportionately impacted by the systemic climate shocks that these breakdowns in biodiversity will have on our economies?

  Absolutely. The majority of the world’s poor live towards the middle of the planet, and with climate change those populations will have to move north and south to get further away from the equator, which will mean huge shocks to countries if we do nothing or if we do not do enough. That will have the biggest impact on the world’s poor and will increase desertification of the planet.

  I will talk briefly about climate more generally. As well as an insect Armageddon, we have a climate emergency, although the Government have not yet acknowledged that. Government decisions on spending and taxation would be exempted from environmental principles, while Ministers are required only to “have regard” to them elsewhere. Legally binding, time-bound targets are also missing from the draft legislation. Our future is tied to the future of the planet and economic policies are not independent of the future survival of life on the planet. The environment Bill must acknowledge and enshrine that, and I hope to see that happen in Committee.

  Full debate: Insect Population

• 28 Feb 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  Time is short for this debate and for the planet. I am going to speak up for the 3,000 young people who came out in Leeds two weeks ago on the youth climate strike and all the other thousands of young people who came out in every other town and city in the country. I spoke to those young people and said that I would come to the House and support their call for us to address the climate emergency. I call on the Minister today to say that the Government will declare a climate emergency as they would a civil emergency, because we are on the precipice of disaster.

  We need a rapid programme of decarbonisation. We need to become a leader in decarbonised technology in this country and in Europe. We need a world in 2030, not 2050, that looks radically different from the world we have today, a world where petrol stations are as common as coaching inns, if we are to avoid climate disaster. We need electric vehicle charge points in every parking bay. All new houses need to be made in factories from airtight and energy-efficient timber. We need to harness the internet and open and smart data, so that everybody knows everything about their lives, from the quality of the air to the amount of carbon in their clothes.

  Full debate: Net Zero Carbon Emissions: UK’s Progress

• 16 Jan 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  Lastly, we are on track in energy production because coal-fired power stations are being scrapped. The industry itself has seen the future, and has already decommissioned or moved into biomass and other forms of energy production. However, if we think the solution is continued gas production—undertaking shale gas extraction in the United Kingdom—we will again fall behind our targets when we move into the fifth carbon budget. We cannot allow that to happen. We need to look at alternatives, including domestic solar, onshore and offshore wind, hydrogen, hydro, and obviously tidal lagoons, for which my hon. Friend the Member for Cardiff North is a great champion. If we do not do that, we will again be behind, and will not meet the legally binding targets that we must meet as a nation. The Government must do better. In the main Chamber, Members are debating confidence in the Government, and part of the reason for my lack of confidence in this Government is their failure to tackle the catastrophic climate change that we will face if we do not meet this challenge.

  Full debate: UN Climate Change Conference: Government Response

• 30 Oct 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  After the Government have been taken to court and lost three times over air quality, and following the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report stating that we have just 12 years to avert climate change catastrophe, I expected this Budget to deliver the investment we need in clean, green infrastructure for our lungs and our planet. In a quest to bring down costs, the Chancellor has not looked to capitalise on the opportunities that a modern, green economy would bring to the UK. Instead, he has focused on miserly cost-cutting measures. This is a Budget of abject complacency in the face of climate catastrophe. As usual, the Government’s obsession with low-cost public services and their lack of any serious investment have left our environment, the water we drink and the air we breathe off the agenda.

  The UK needs to lead the fight for cleaner air and carbon reduction. To do that, we need to incentivise a just transition for health, jobs and the environment. Why, then, has the Chancellor cut subsidies for plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles? How does he expect British drivers to make the switch from petrol and diesel cars if they are not encouraged to do so? Why does a Nissan Leaf have the same VAT rate as a Hummer? Should clean cars not be VAT-exempt? Where is the investment in the electric vehicle infrastructure that we so desperately need? In my constituency there is not a single public charge point; this is fourth time I have raised this issue in the House, and there are still no charge points. There are very few rapid charge points on British motorways, too. That does not build confidence in the new technology, and it leaves EV drivers with charge anxiety. There is no point in encouraging people to buy electric or hybrid vehicles if we do not provide the necessary infrastructure. The Government must do their bit. We need charge points in every community, rapid charge points across our road network and real investment in EV infrastructure and affordability.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions

• 30 Oct 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources is meeting now in Hobart. What progress has the UK delegation made in securing a marine protected area for the Weddell sea, which is absolutely vital to stop run-away climate change?

  Full debate: Topical Questions

• 9 May 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr McCabe. The take-up of electric vehicles and electric bikes is vital in our fight against irreversible climate change and to improve our air quality—especially in cities, given that so many of our cities exceed both EU and World Health Organisation safe air quality levels. I represent a constituency with no public electric vehicle chargepoints, which is an issue I have raised with the Minister for Energy and Clean Growth, the right hon. Member for Devizes (Claire Perry), both publicly and privately. I can now add this Minister to the list of those I am raising it with.

  Full debate: Electric Vehicles and Bicycles

• 28 Mar 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  I wish to concentrate my final remarks on the city’s work on climate change. As the deputy executive member for climate change and sustainability, I proudly played a part in the city’s work until my election to this place. Before the historic Conference of Parties 21, Leeds was the first authority to commit to 100% clean energy by 2050. The city has begun many projects to achieve that ambitious environmental goal. In my first few months in office, we installed more than 1,000 solar roofs on council homes and buildings, but we could not continue the programme owing to the Government’s cut in the feed-in tariff for solar. The council has had an extensive programme of replacing diesel with electric vehicles and now has a fleet of more than 70 electric vehicles.

  Full debate: Local Government Funding

• 6 Mar 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend the Member for Harrow West (Gareth Thomas) and others have referred to municipal energy companies and co-ops. Robin Hood Energy has been mentioned, and White Rose Energy has been started by my local authority in Leeds—I declare an interest both as a customer and having been the deputy executive member for climate change and sustainability when White Rose Energy was launched.

  Full debate: Domestic Gas and Electricity (Tariff Cap) Bill

• 28 Nov 2017: Parliamentary Speech

  I am pleased that there is to be some investment in infrastructure for electric vehicles, but the Government need to listen to the Industrial Strategy Commission’s recommendation that infrastructure investment should be universal. My constituency does not have a single public charge point. How shameful is that? We also need to take more urgent action to tackle climate change. I urge the Government to listen to Labour Members and to commit to themselves to ensuring that 60% of the UK’s energy comes from low-carbon or renewable sources by 2030.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions

• 10 Oct 2017: Parliamentary Speech

  In Yorkshire these structures are still opaque and confusing for most people. People in many of our towns and cities would not recognise themselves as being part of a city region, but they understand the idea of Yorkshire. Yorkshire people are proud of being part of Yorkshire, and it is time that our identity and regional uniqueness were acknowledged, and not dismissed by this Government. If our region could speak with a single voice, it would be a player on the world stage, rather than on the national stage. As my hon. Friend the Member for Keighley (John Grogan) said, both industry and the unions have backed the One Yorkshire model. They want to develop region-wide hubs around IT, tourism, food and advanced manufacturing, including low-carbon and renewable energy, helping to create 21st-century jobs and 21st-century solutions which can be the envy of the world and start to rebalance our economy away from London. That is the most important goal for our region and others.

  Full debate: Devolution: Yorkshire

• 12 Jul 2017: Parliamentary Speech

  My own history in Leeds North West started, like that of so many of my fellow constituents, as a student in one of the city’s fine universities. It was at university that my interest in fighting for justice and equality began, as staff-student representative for the School of Computing at the University of Leeds, first advocating for my fellow students, before going on to campaign on issues such as student funding and against racism on campus. I am still an elected member of Leeds City Council, and prior to my election here, I was the lead for climate change and chair of the affordable warmth partnership—two topics that are close to my heart and to which I will return shortly.

  I am sure that all Members of the House agree with me on the need for urgent action on safety, but I would like to address the use of cladding as part of our wider aims to reduce carbon emissions and to reduce fuel bills, tackling fuel poverty. In my constituency, a wholesale programme of external wall insulation started, but then stalled due to cuts in energy company obligation funding, leaving one side of the road with clad buildings and the other side without. External wall insulation—whether using mineral wool, phenolic resin or other materials that meet building regulations and have a U-value of 0.3—contributes to eradicating fuel poverty and to meeting our obligations under the Paris climate change agreement. We must ensure that this work is completed, alongside other measures not just in housing but in transport, energy and manufacturing, to ensure that runaway climate change does not occur. The safety of our citizens is paramount, so we must also ensure that our standards and inspection regimes are among the best in the world.

  “No challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.”

  This Chamber is a stage where the world can hear our voice. It is incumbent on me to use that voice to ensure that while I sit on these Benches, I will speak truth to power and be an advocate for this one issue, which will define and shape our future more than any other. Action to combat climate change will give us the best possible chance to save this planet, because it is the only home that we have got. If we do not ensure that we take every step towards a carbon-free future, we will be judged as having failed future generations, and I am sure nobody came into this House to be a failure.

  Full debate: Grenfell Tower Fire Inquiry