Anna Turley MP: Climate Timeline

• Timeline
• Votes
• Speeches
• Tweets
• Contact

Anna Turley's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Anna Turley

• 05 Oct 2024: Tweet

  So delighted to welcome the ????Labour government’s commitment to progressing Carbon Capture on Teesside. We can lead the world in developing new skills, technologies & support the industrial transition to NetZero. ???? https://x.com/annaturley/status/1842483872677716047/video/1 [Source]

• 04 Oct 2024: Tweet

  Just brilliant that today Teesside will be at the heart of Labour’s commitment to a Net Zero future. This will be transformative and put us at the heart of the green energy transition and the jobs and opportunities of the future. Record investment in Teesside ???????????? https://x.com/annaturley/status/1842119459428786513/photo/1 [Source]

• 26 Sep 2024: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Britain is back as a climate leader. That’s my message to our international partners at #ClimateWeekNYC Our world-leadin… [Source]

• 26 Sep 2024: Tweet

  RT @energygovuk: Climate leadership is essential if we are to protect both the UK and global citizens from the climate crisis. As well l… [Source]

• 25 Mar 2024: Tweet

  RT @JoStevensLabour: Great to visit Ynys Môn with @Keir_Starmer & @vaughangething this morning to discuss Wales's huge green energy potenti… [Source]

• 25 Mar 2024: Tweet

  RT @vaughangething: Great to welcome @Keir_Starmer to Ynys Môn today to discuss the massive green energy opportunities on the island. Our… [Source]

• 27 Sep 2023: Tweet

  @nationaltrust @DeborahMeaden Apart from the obvious tackling of climate change - are there rewinding measures that can be undertaken? [Source]

• 10 May 2023: Tweet

  @67_mjm @ChrisGarbutt27 @JulieElliottMP What kind of ‘partnership’ gives 90% of a site away for nothing so they can reap the profit? I’ve always championed green investment there from CCS to hydrogen. But companies won’t invest if they think things aren’t above board. We aren’t the only ones with concerns as you’ll see [Source]

• 08 Apr 2023: Tweet

  @rockyhud @Thehuck_59 I think our ambitions on climate change are going to be very bold. [Source]

• 18 Oct 2022: Tweet

  I’d just laugh at this if they weren’t running the country and the climate crisis wasn’t existential… https://twitter.com/danbloom1/status/1582410099263275010 [Source]

• 29 Jul 2022: Tweet

  @MarinaHyde @allanjenkins21 @Tatlermagazine This is my personal favourite (by favourite I mean hernia-inducing) quote: ‘I was asked to work on the COP26 climate change summit (quite cleansing for the brand after Vote Leave and Johnson’s No 10)’ [Source]

• 29 Jul 2022: Tweet

  @TomBlenkinsop @MichaelDugher What have I just read?! ‘I was asked to work on the COP26 climate change summit (quite cleansing for the brand after Vote Leave and Johnson’s No 10)’ [Source]

• 18 Jul 2022: Tweet

  @rcuffy End of days Bob. Now this climate change stuff just got real. [Source]

• 11 Jun 2022: Tweet

  That was a lot of fun Bristol ☀️! Really enjoyed 2 days of ideas, debate, inspiration, & x-party discussion on everything from climate change, inequality, regeneration, health, food poverty, building communities, work & housing. @BigTentIdeas festival is the political Glasto!???? https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1535684536016715781/photo/1 [Source]

• 25 Apr 2022: Tweet

  Imagine what you could do to tackle climate change, global poverty, education, preventable disease etc with $44billion. But yeah….. twitter…. #ElonMusk [Source]

• 09 Aug 2021: Tweet

  @FactsReason @MailOnline Your timeline is full of climate change denial and you dismiss facts as ‘anti-Brexit spin’ because it doesn’t fit with your ideology. The fact is Brexit has led to a shortage of HGV drivers. [Source]

• 07 Nov 2020: Tweet

  @DanSmithForTees @utb_smith @BorisJohnson ‘Shit what can we say that we have in common or that he will like?!’ ‘Erm...climate change?!’ [Source]

• 15 Nov 2019: Tweet

  @SouthTeesGreens @whiterosegreen I would love to come and chat to your members some time. I was doing a lot of work in Parliament on issues like clean gas and CCUS to help meet climate targets but we need much more action. Think we have huge potential on Teesside to be a green jobs hub [Source]

• 24 Oct 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  Where is our investment for carbon capture and storage that could create 1 million jobs in the chemical industry? Where is the support for great institutions such as TTE Technical Institute and Redcar College to give young people the skills and apprenticeships they need? Where is the support for Teesside’s hydrogen economy to produce heat, to green our transport and to help us to hit our net-zero targets? Where is the Government’s backing for the huge Sirius Minerals project that is now at risk, along with 1,000 jobs? Three hundred jobs are already gone because the Treasury pulled the plug on its support. British Steel still sits on a knife edge. The people of Redcar and Teesside stand ready to get back on their feet. They are desperate to work, but they cannot do it alone. There is nothing in this Queen’s Speech for them.

  Full debate: The Economy

• 03 Aug 2019: Tweet

  Teesside produces over 50% of Britain’s hydrogen. We could be leading the world in this green technology and I believe soon will be. We can play a big role in getting Britain to #netzero emissions. Proud to chair the @HydrogenAPPG #climatecrisis https://twitter.com/jamesmelville/status/1157546779816157184 [Source]

• 24 Jul 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  Through the industrial strategy, the Government have established programmes to support improvement in energy efficiency, which is very important; to decarbonise industrial clusters, of which steelmaking is a prime example; and to invest in research and development. Through the industrial strategy, we have the biggest increase in R&D in the history of this country. I am making these points to prospective purchasers so that they can see that the environment is a positive one.

  It is important strategically and for regional employment to maintain a steel industry in the United Kingdom, and I do welcome the efforts that the Secretary of State has made to date. However, does he not realise that high-cost renewable energy plans and costly decarbonisation policies—pursued by this Government and previous Administrations, who, quite frankly, have pandered to a Luddite green lobby in this country—have resulted in energy-intensive industries moving out of Britain, with the aluminium industry being an example? These issues will have to be addressed if we are to maintain a viable steel industry in the United Kingdom in the future.

  Full debate: British Steel

• 16 Jul 2019: Tweet

  Grilling the Energy & Clean Growth Minister in @CommonsBEIS on government plans for #netzero - measuring our emissions, how industry in Britain can make the transition and how to ensure communities dependent on polluting industries are not disadvantaged by this transition. https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1151167043607117824/photo/1 [Source]

• 9 Jul 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  Innovation is crucial. The hon. Member for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland (Mr Clarke) mentioned the Materials Processing Institute, which is in my constituency. It is doing fantastic work. It has been around for 75 years; it was formed just after D-Day. It has a fantastic vision for innovation: new technologies, decarbonised steel, the digitisation of the steel and metals sector, and a circular economy for steel, alloys and rare metals. Those are really important innovations. If we do not support originations and businesses that are doing that work, I am afraid we will see more redundancies and job losses, and the loss of a huge amount of capacity and capability. Therefore, innovation must be at the cutting edge of productivity, and we must support innovation experts such as the MPI, which are at the heart of this.

  Full debate: UK Steel Industry

• 03 Jul 2019: Tweet

  Great to join @Policy_Connect at their reception on energy and the environment yesterday. I made a bid to the future PM to invest in hydrogen and carbon capture - both crucial if we are to decarbonise heating, transport and industry whilst protecting jobs. @HydrogenAPPG https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1146431175579394049/photo/1 [Source]

• 25 Jun 2019: Tweet

  I’ve often heard it asked in debates why Britain should lead the way on tackling carbon emission rather than other counties.... #netzero https://twitter.com/EdConwaySky/status/1143424869276762113 [Source]

• 12 Jun 2019: Tweet

  Really interesting @CommonsBEIS committee this morning discussing how we can upgrade our energy infrastructure to meet our new #netzero carbon target. Hydrogen, CCUS, electric vehicles & onshore wind all highlighted as priorities. ????@HydrogenAPPG https://twitter.com/CommonsBTC/status/1138699452833705985 [Source]

• 25 Apr 2019: Tweet

  Government urged to back carbon capture technology to meet climate change goals https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/carbon-capture-and-storage-technology-government-support-climate-change-a8885191.html [Source]

• 25 Apr 2019: Tweet

  Britain’s politicians call for the use of hydrogen as a source of energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-25/hydrogen-as-a-heating-source-gets-a-boost-in-u-k-from-lawmakers via @technology [Source]

• 25 Apr 2019: Tweet

  Our @CommonsBEIS report welcomes the Government's ambition to deploy CCUS by the 2030s - but we're concerned it doesn't demonstrate a sufficiently strong commitment, limiting our #climatechange ambitions, the future of heavy industries, & the potential for investment into CCUS. https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1121424473436164096/video/1 [Source]

• 25 Apr 2019: Tweet

  The #climatechange protests, and the words of @GretaThunberg, show there are hugely important decisions to be made on cutting carbon emissions. Experts agree carbon capture usage & storage is necessary and our @CommonsBEIS report argues Government must do more to deliver it. https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1121422082888359936/video/1 [Source]

• 25 Apr 2019: Tweet

  Tees heavy industries 'could close' without vital technology to curb climate change impact - @TeessideLive reports on our @CommonsBEIS carbon capture and storage report published today https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/tees-heavy-industries-could-close-16175304 [Source]

• 23 Apr 2019: Tweet

  Today's UQ on Climate Action has kept the Minister @claireperrymp busy in the chamber, whilst our @HydrogenAPPG event in the Attlee Suite is promoting solutions to decarbonising heat which accounts for 30% of greenhouse gas emissions. Come along 4pm-6pm #HydrogenShowcase [Source]

• 03 Apr 2019: Tweet

  Very amused by Rt Hon Lord Peter Lilley, Life Peer, member of the Privy Council, holder of 4 senior ministerial roles under Tory governments, Thatcher loyalist, former chair of the Bow Group, anti-climate change petroleum lobbyist, raging about the ‘establishment’ on my telly ???? [Source]

• 11 Mar 2019: Tweet

  Great @HydrogenAPPG discussion today about the exciting things happening with hydrogen tech. Huge potential to decarbonise the UK's gas network & innovative trials are underway. Good to hear from @david_joffe, Heidi Genomi at @Hy4Heat and @james_h_kerr. https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1105159741121183744/photo/1 [Source]

• 17 Jan 2019: Tweet

  Thank you to everyone who gave evidence today to our @CommonsBEIS committee. We will be publishing the results of our enquiry soon. Carbon capture, usage and storage has huge potential to bring jobs and investment to Teesside & make us a global leader in tackling climate change https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1085951017894756352/photo/1 [Source]

• 17 Jan 2019: Tweet

  First part of our cross party @CommonsBEIS visit to Teesside to discuss carbon capture usage and storage started with a visit to @cffertilisers in Billingham which makes 40% of the UK’s fertiliser & is working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1085881811580813315/photo/1 [Source]

• 16 Jan 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  Some of the questions that we need to hear the Minister answer today—I remind her that employees are watching and listening closely—include how she plans to reverse the industry’s decline in 2019 and give it the support it needs. Will she commit to giving British bioethanol a future, or will the UK source it from abroad when domestic capacity is lost? As we have already heard today, there are wider implications for other renewable energy producers. Why would investors trust the Government’s word and put hundreds of millions of pounds into projects that we desperately need in this country, when, given the experience of the bioethanol project, they might later prove out of fashion with this Government? Certainty and stability is vital for business, and the sector is clear that that has to mean making E10 mandatory for fuel suppliers. Anything less will not provide sufficient confidence that the demand for E10 is there, and the facilities will close for good.

  As my hon. Friend the Member for Sedgefield (Phil Wilson) mentioned, there is a concern for the agricultural sector, too, which produces the feed wheat for the industry and consumes the high protein animal feed co-produced by it. The two industries work hand in hand, serving as a stable and reliable co-dependent supply chain. We are not talking about backing E10 for the sake of the producers. We know there is a strong environmental case for introducing E10, reducing carbon emissions equivalent to the removal of 700,000 cars from Britain’s roads, and improving air quality by lowering carcinogens, particulate matter, hydrocarbons, and oxides of nitrogen. Given that transport is now the UK’s most polluting sector, accounting for 28% of the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions, we will not meet our climate change targets without getting to grips with the problem.

  Full debate: British Bioethanol Industry

• 11 Jan 2019: Tweet

  Proud to have invited my @CommonsBEIS colleagues to Teesside next week to see our ambitions for carbon capture, usage and storage - we can be leading the world in efforts to meet our climate change commitments & bring new jobs & investment here. https://twitter.com/CommonsBTC/status/1083786150253350912 [Source]

• 28 Nov 2018: Tweet

  Alex has been driving the Carbon Capture Usage & Storage thinking in Parliament for many years as chair of the All-Party Group on CCS. This is a proud day for Teesside and he has played a really big role in this. https://twitter.com/ACunninghamMP/status/1067744826257522688 [Source]

• 28 Nov 2018: Tweet

  'World first for Tees Valley as multi-billion pound clean energy plant announced' - big vote of confidence in Teesside that will bring lots of jobs & make us a leader in green energy. Now we need to pull out all of the stops to deliver it https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/business/17259770.world-first-for-tees-valley-as-multi-billion-pound-clean-energy-plant-announced/?ref=rss #InvestInTeesside https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1067720931999666176/photo/1 [Source]

• 27 Nov 2018: Tweet

  Last week at @CommonsBEIS we questioned @claireperrymp on the Govt's Clean Growth Strategy and carbon capture, usage & storage. CCUS is crucial to the future of industry on Teesside - protecting jobs and creating new ones - but to be delivered it needs clear leadership from Govt. https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1067496288801837056/video/1 [Source]

• 13 Nov 2018: Tweet

  At the All Party Parliamentary Carbon Capture & Storage Grp. CCS is critical if we’re to reach our carbon reduction targets. Enough talking - we need to start developing the projects & Teesside is ready! Powerful presentation by Oxford’s @GideonHenderson @The_CCSA @ACunninghamMP https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/1062332849033043968/photo/1 [Source]

• 31 Oct 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  I am deeply worried by how little we saw in the Budget for Teesside. We have the potential on the site not just to turn things around for the people of Redcar and Teesside but to show the way on the sort of economy we could have in this country: a leading hub for green industries, creating jobs and helping us meet our climate change targets, carbon capture and storage, hydrogen economy, recycling and energy generation. We have a great future in Teesside—the brains, the hearts and the hands. We can make it happen.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions

• 11 Oct 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  Like the hon. Gentleman, I make no apology for lobbying for freeport status on behalf of the port in my constituency. Teesport has strong structural advantages that should make it favoured for freeport status, including a deep-water facility that provides lock-free access to the sea and strong road and rail services. The facility already handles 5,000 vessels and 40 million tonnes of cargo a year. The port is integral to the Teesside manufacturing complex, incorporating chemicals, engineering, renewable energy and agritech.

  Full debate: Freeports

• 13 Mar 2018: Tweet

  We are up against the biggest environmental threat ever faced. 1 in 6 of the planet’s species are at risk of extinction from climate change. It’s #earthhour Sat 24th March @wwf_uk #PromiseForThePlanet https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/973536737313030144/photo/1 [Source]

• 8 Mar 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  The Committee on Climate Change has cautioned that there are policy areas where the Government need to flesh out the detail of how they will deliver on those aims of cutting our carbon emissions. We all know that there is no path to meeting our carbon emission target that does not involve the decarbonisation of industry. I want to focus on that in particular.

  In 2016, industrial emissions fell, but largely due to the closure of the SSI steelworks in Redcar. Actually, energy prices played a huge role in the 2015 steel crisis. In the UK, our steel companies were paying 80% above the EU median cost for energy—that is a huge factor in one of the challenges that our steel industry faces—but we know that we cannot meet our emissions targets without looking at industry. No one wishes to see a repeat of the 2015 closure of the SSI steelworks in Redcar, which ended 175 years of a major industry that built the world by providing the steel that forged everything from the Sydney harbour bridge to the new Wembley stadium. The loss of 3,000 jobs had a devastating impact on an area with a proud heritage and a proud history of driving the industrial revolution through steel production and its many other energy-intensive industries. We do not want to reduce our emissions through that kind of crisis. Industrial decarbonisation, done in a properly sustained, managed and strategic way, is the way forward, and it is a clear priority in the Government’s strategy.

  We already have good energy efficiency action plans for several sectors, including cement, ceramics, oil and chemicals. That is a really positive start, but we need to go much further to meet the challenge. One of the easiest and most cost-effective solutions is carbon capture and storage. As the Minister knows, Teesside is hugely ambitious about becoming one of Europe’s first clean industrial zones and using CCS to drive that. The Teesside Collective in my constituency is ready and waiting to start decarbonising UK industry.

  The chemicals sector is up against strong international competition. NEPIC estimates that CCS could create and safeguard almost 250,000 jobs in the next 30 to 40 years. The Committee on Climate Change has shown that CCS could virtually halve the cost to the UK of meeting emissions targets. The UK is especially well placed to be a leader in the industry, not least because of the storage space in depleted oilfields just off our coast. The Library estimates that CCS could sustain up to 60,000 jobs and deliver a £160 billion economic boost by 2050 if it were delivered along the east coast.

  The Government have promised a CCS demonstration project, which I really welcome. Of course, I sincerely hope that it will be in Teesside, but wherever in the UK it is based, the most important thing is that it comes to fruition. We cannot lose another opportunity. The new £100 million commitment is a significant downgrade from the £1 billion of funding that the Government pulled from CCS in 2015. It is a cautious investment in a crucial technology, but I welcome it as an important step forward.

  On Teesside, we are taking a couple of other approaches to improving energy efficiency and decarbonising. District heating has huge potential. I welcome the Government’s recognition of the role that it can play in reducing bills for both homes and businesses, and we are keen to deliver it on Teesside. We want to use our vast renewable energy resources, which the wind turbines off our coast make very visible, to support our energy intensive industries, and we want to continue to innovate, as we have done for more than 200 years. We want to use the carbon dioxide that is produced for useful projects, such as replacing oil with bio-resource. We have a huge number of plans afoot in Teesside. We are looking to work positively and constructively with the Government, and we welcome all the positive signals we have had from them so far.

  Finally, let me say something about our potential. Energy efficiency and clean growth are not only priorities for tackling climate change and poverty, but offer huge economic potential in jobs and investment in the UK. In areas such as mine, which lost 3,000 jobs overnight, every job is critical. We desperately need investment and growth. The UK energy efficiency sector already turns over £20.3 billion, employs 144,000 people and sells exports worth more than £1 billion. We are in a prime position, particularly in Teesside, further to increase the market and to export our skills and technology to the world. This is a chance to future-proof our industries, protect our jobs and create new ones, and ensure that areas such as Teesside can play as big a role in the industry of this country and the world in the future as they did in the past.

  Full debate: Energy Efficiency and the Clean Growth Strategy

• 8 Jan 2018: Parliamentary Speech

  Ports are already a vital strategic asset for the UK, accounting for 96% of all trade volume and 75% of trade value. The free port concept builds on our maritime history and an existing UK strength. The creation of a free port would increase employment and economic activity in areas where economic need is high and could play a major role in rebalancing our London-centric economy. Of the country’s 30 largest ports, 17, including Teesside in my own constituency, are in the bottom quartile of local authorities in the index of multiple deprivation. I make no apology for lobbying for such a status on behalf of the port in my constituency. Teesport has strong structural advantages for being favoured for free port status. It has a deep-water facility providing lock-free access to the sea, with strong road and rail services. Teesport is versatile and adaptable. The facility handles 5,000 vessels and 40 million tonnes of cargo a year. The port is integral to the Teesside manufacturing complex, incorporating chemicals, engineering, renewable energy, and agri-tech. The South Tees development corporation is overseeing the former SSI site—the biggest industrial opportunity the UK has seen since the second world war. When the Government closed the steelworks in 2015 and 3,000 Teessiders lost their jobs, the Government promised to do all they could. On the Prime Minister’s most recent visit, she told us that we had to look to the future. Well, we are—the question is, are the Government?

  Full debate: Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill

• 21 Oct 2017: Tweet

  @nmcinroy Heritage retained and use of land as visitor destination but will be high tech/green industries e.g. CCS [Source]

• 19 Oct 2017: Parliamentary Speech

  Carbon capture and storage is a technology with huge importance for our industry, energy and our climate challenges. It has huge potential to bring investment and jobs to Teesside, which is why I am so pleased to be joined today by so many colleagues from the Tees valley area. I welcome the shared cross-party ambition to see the UK leading the way by introducing CCS into our national infrastructure.

  Following the clean growth strategy, which the Government published recently, I hope that this debate will help to reinforce the case for making progress. Earlier this year, I pressed the hon. Member for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner (Mr Hurd)—the then industry Minister—on the need for some clear Government leadership to help to get the technology off the ground, and I am delighted to see the process reignited in the clean growth strategy and the promise of a CCS demonstration project. I sincerely hope to see that responsibility granted to the Teesside Collective in my constituency—a project ready and waiting to start decarbonising UK industry.

  Meeting our commitments to reduce emissions under the Climate Change Act 2008 and the Paris agreement while protecting and expanding British industry is a serious challenge. The fifth carbon budget commits to a 57% reduction from 1990 levels by 2030. The easiest and most cost-effective solution to this challenge is, without doubt, CCS.

  Research by the Committee on Climate Change has shown that CCS could virtually halve the costs for the UK of meeting emissions targets. The UK is especially well placed to be a leader in the industry, not least because of storage space in our depleted oilfields just off our coasts, but the clock is ticking. The UK has fallen down the Global CCS Institute’s readiness index in the past two years, due to a

  “lack of clear CCS policy”.

  The Committee on Climate Change has also been clear that we must develop this technology in the coming years so that we are ready for a full-scale operation in the 2030s.

  There is also an urgent need to stay competitive with our continental partners, which is particularly important post-Brexit. In fact, getting ahead on CCS could be the competitive edge that we need to attract inward investment. If we delay, we will see that investment lost to other countries who get ahead. For example, this year Norway announced the award of contracts for full-scale carbon capture at cement, ammonia and waste-to-energy plants. In 2016, Toshiba completed construction of a carbon capture facility at a waste incineration plant in Saga city, and the world’s first large-scale carbon capture facility in the steel industry was launched in Abu Dhabi. The Dutch Government have committed to CCS and handling 20 million tonnes by 2030 from industrial sites. Rotterdam is one of the biggest industrial zone competitors, so it is vital for Teesside to get ahead.

  The difficulties we have experienced in the steel industry, where energy cost pressures are higher than those faced by our European competitors, are a warning of what is to come if we do not get serious about industry decarbonisation. As my neighbour, the hon. Member for Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland, has mentioned, our region has huge CCS potential. The Teesside Collective project could become one of Europe’s first clean industrial zones.

  Yesterday, I attended the launch of the South Tees mayoral development corporation’s strategic masterplan for the future of the former SSI steel site. At 2,000 acres, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to attract global investment and to become a hub for new industries and technologies. We could genuinely create a world-renowned site for clean industry with CCS at its heart.

  Teesside is home to nearly 60% of the UK’s major energy users in the process and chemical sectors. The internationally renowned North East of England Process Industry Cluster—NEPIC—represents chemical-based industries in the region, but particularly those concentrated in Teesside. The sector generates £26 billion of annual sales, £12 billion of exports and is the north-east’s largest industrial sector. BOC, one of the Teesside Collective partners, operates the UK’s largest hydrogen plant, which produces over half the UK’s hydrogen. If we are to convert our gas grids to hydrogen—as Leeds is currently exploring—CCS on Teesside would need to be a key part of that decarbonisation strategy. Another Teesside Collective partner, Lotte Chemical, produces plastic for the soft drinks industry. CCS could capture over 90% of its carbon output, essentially decarbonising the soft drinks materials supply chain.

  The density of our industry makes us a heavy emitter of carbon dioxide—it is three times the national average and accounts for more than a fifth of all UK industrial emissions. That makes us especially vulnerable to uncompetitive energy prices and carbon price pressures relative to other countries, but it also makes us a prime candidate for CCS, because the technology could drastically cut a very significant proportion of UK emissions. If we combine that with our close proximity to the North sea industry and potential storage sites in depleted oil fields, it means that Teesside would be one of the most efficient and cost-effective locations for a test case. The technology would help us to maintain and even enhance the comparative advantage we already have in chemicals and process industries. Or, to put it another way, without support to decarbonise our industry, we risk seeing the problems at the SSI steelworks happen in our other sectors.

  NEPIC estimates that the use of CCS could create and safeguard almost 250,000 jobs by 2060, and 7,000 new jobs could be created in Teesside for the building and operating of facilities alone. The House of Commons Library estimates that CCS could sustain up to 60,000 jobs and deliver a £160 billion economic boost by 2050 if it is delivered along the east coast. Teesside is ready and waiting to face the carbon reduction challenge and could be capturing and storing CO 2 within six years.

  The Teesside Collective has costed engineering for three industrial plants and presented to Government the business case for an initial CCS hub in Tees valley. Its proposals are for a cost-effective introduction strategy, with companies capturing and storing 11 million tonnes of carbon dioxide over 15 years. That would then expand to include power stations and more industrial companies as the network demonstrates its worth. It estimates that a pilot could repay up to £31 million a year to the Government in carbon savings.

  The Government have understandably been concerned about cost and value for money for the taxpayer, which unfortunately led to the disappointing decision in 2015 to cancel the £1 billion CCS competition. I am glad that the Government have changed their view and recognised that CCS is a technology where, for relatively small up-front investment, greater savings in reducing carbon can be made down the line.

  The Oxburgh review noted that investing in CCS now would deliver the lowest cost to the consumer and that heavy costs would follow if it kept being delayed. I truly welcome the Government’s commitment of £100 million in the strategy, and I hope that some of that will support the £15 million FEED—front-end engineering design—study requested by the Teesside Collective. The Oxburgh review suggests that CCS on a power station could be constructed at a cost of £85 per megawatt-hour under state ownership, which is lower than Hinkley Point’s £92.5 per megawatt-hour. Those costs would be even lower for industrial clusters. Analysis by Green Alliance, for instance, suggests that costs in that context could be cut by two thirds, making it comparable to wind and solar power. The Teesside Collective already has two industrial plants producing pure CO 2 and therefore requiring no additional capture facilities at all.

  The important thing is that business and Government work together to devise a sustainable funding model that does not place unsustainable costs or risks on the partner business or consumers. One crucial element missing from the clean growth strategy is the lynchpin for starting any major CCS project in the UK: work on transportation and storage. The report of the parliamentary advisory group on CCS stated:

  As the Government acknowledge in the clean growth strategy, the success of the offshore wind cost reduction taskforce provides a good model for the cost challenge taskforce on CCS. However, as NEPIC has argued, that success was based on Government investment through a clear marketplace and a funding model that provided the certainty that investors need. Both the Oxburgh review and the Green Alliance report recommend contracts for difference or similar for financing the storage infrastructure to achieve that.

  The strongest message that I want to send to the Government is: let us get moving on this as soon as possible. The Public Accounts Committee cautions that the UK has already missed opportunities, and we cannot afford to lose any more. It is crucial for our energy and climate strategy, but it is also a chance for Britain to take a world lead in a cutting-edge industry, future-proof our industries, protect jobs and create new ones. Teesside stands ready and willing to get to work and make it happen.

  Full debate: Carbon Capture and Storage

• 19 Oct 2017: Tweet

  .@ACunninghamMP setting out how Teesside has the workforce and the skills to deliver CCS & make the UK a world leader [Source]

• 19 Oct 2017: Tweet

  Great to have a huge Teesside turnout for the CCS debate - @ACunninghamMP @AndyMcDonaldMP @MikeHillMP @PaulWilliamsMP @SimonClarkeMP [Source]

• 11 Oct 2017: Tweet

  Pleased to have worked with Simon to secure this - look forward to the debate - cross party support for project with huge job potential #ccs https://twitter.com/simonclarkemp/status/917795612552200193 [Source]

• 06 Sep 2016: Vote

  Finance Bill — VAT on Installation of Energy Saving Materials - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 09 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Planning obligations and affordable housing - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 03 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Neighbourhood right of appeal - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 14 Mar 2016: Vote

  Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 8 — Decarbonisation target range - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Mar 2016: Vote

  Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 3 — Carbon capture and storage strategy for the energy industry - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 19 Jan 2016: Tweet

  Real disappointment that government pulled funding for the first #CCS project - huge importance to energy industries https://twitter.com/tomblenkinsop/status/689403418574630912 [Source]

• 18 Jan 2016: Tweet

  @angelasmithmp @CommunityUnion a modern, high tech industry with a big role to play in future of British manufacturing eg CCS. [Source]

• 20 Nov 2015: Tweet

  Great to have MEP @Jude_KD speaking to Redcar Labour on steel, climate change, security & benefits of EU to Teesside https://twitter.com/annaturley/status/667791883696013312/photo/1 [Source]

• 19 Nov 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  T3. Community-led renewable energy schemes empower communities, tackle fuel poverty and provide jobs, so why is the Secretary of State sitting back and letting the Treasury do a U-turn on social investment tax relief, given that that will undermine new schemes? Does she support community energy schemes, and, if so, will she update the House on her plans to support this important part of the co-operative sector? ( 902209 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 05 Nov 2015: Tweet

  More concerning news on Teesside- Construction suspended at renewable energy plant with 700 workers affected - BT http://home.bt.com/news/uk-news/construction-suspended-at-renewable-energy-plant-with-700-workers-affected-11364014886909 [Source]

• 26 Oct 2015: Vote

  Finance Bill (Ways and Means) (Payment of Corporation Tax) — Chapter 5 — Supplementary provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 13 Oct 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend the Member for Warrington South (David Mowat) is right about the irony of the Labour party complaining about steel plants closing when it imposed the Climate Change Act 2008 on the UK, which unilaterally put huge costs on energy that other countries did not face. Will the Minister confirm that the Government have learned the lesson and will not unilaterally impose huge energy costs and carbon emission targets on British businesses? If the Government do not make that commitment, many other manufacturing jobs will follow. We are merely exporting jobs to other countries around the world.

  High carbon taxes and energy costs played a major role in SSI failing. Many other industries across our country are facing the self-same issues. Hundreds of my constituents lost their jobs on Teesside last week. How many more jobs have to be lost before the Government change their policy and start to address these issues?

  Full debate: Redcar Coke Ovens

• 17 Sep 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  Will my hon. Friend note that the failure to implement immediately, with real urgency, the whole package that will provide a level playing field could mean not only that we offshore more jobs, but that we offshore an industry that has been highly successful in the decarbonisation agenda in this country to places that emit more carbon? Let us keep them here; let us do it now.

  I commend my hon. Friend for his passion and commitment. He is absolutely right. There are things coming on stream on Teesside, such as the carbon capture and storage facility, that will struggle if we do not have the steelworks in Redcar. We stand by our climate change commitments, and the steel sector is doing its best to make a difference.

  Full debate: UK Steel Industry

• 08 Sep 2015: Vote

  Bill Presented — Devolution (London) Bill — Clause 45 — CCL: removal of exemption for electricity from renewable sources - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 11 Aug 2015: Tweet

  £650m Tees Renewable Energy Plant work will start by early next year - details on how to apply for jobs: http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/business/business-news/650m-tees-renewable-energy-plant-9832389 [Source]

• 02 Jun 2013: Tweet

  Investment in green energy at a 7 year low! http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/investment-in-green-energy-falls-to-sevenyear-low-8640849.html [Source]

• 28 Sep 2010: Tweet

  @NLGNthinktank fringe Tackling Climate Change in our Communities today 12:45 Gladstone Room, Radisson. Come along! #labconf [Source]

• 24 Sep 2010: Tweet

  Also fringe debate on #localgov & climate change with @britishgas on Tues 12:45pm, Gladstone Rm, Radisson with Gordon Marsden MP #labconf [Source]

• 30 Apr 2010: Tweet

  Griffin thinks we can make savings from canceling our approach to 'this bogus climate change' [Source]

• 26 Dec 2009: Tweet

  Some dreadful lines like 'fight terror with terror' and some rather laboured connotations with issues like Iraq and climate change. [Source]