Brian Leishman is the Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth.
We have identified 0 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2024 in which Brian Leishman could have voted.
Brian Leishman is rated n/a for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)
Why don't you Contact Brian Leishman MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?
We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Brian Leishman in the last 90 days
See Full History
The enormity of the challenges facing the world right now can seem somewhat overwhelming. We are all, at varying speeds, suffering from the existential threat of climate change. We live in a global economy that is stacked in favour of the few, to the detriment of the many. These issues are driving forces for the volatile, unstable world we live in today. Our Government’s attitude to the international community and how we tackle our own domestic issue of increasing inequality should, therefore, be shaped by the principles of human rights, compassion and social justice—the very principles our party and our wider movement were founded on.
Full debate: Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
If the Grangemouth refinery closes in 2025 and the recommendations of Project Willow will not be ready for years to come, thousands of jobs will be lost—the very definition of an unjust transition. How can the Government possibly claim to have a credible industrial strategy for Scotland if they allow that to happen?
Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions
T4. The previous Conservative Government decided to back an INEOS project in Antwerp, with a £600 million loan guarantee. I have spoken with the current the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero and the Under-Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, my hon. Friend the Member for Rutherglen (Michael Shanks) about that, and I have been told that the Government have no plans to stop that money, even though INEOS plans to close the Grangemouth refinery, with the loss of thousands of jobs. Why is there £600 million for Antwerp and not Grangemouth, and why would the Government allow that to happen and not use the £600 million as leverage with INEOS, to avoid Scottish job losses? ( 902304 )
Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions