Danny Kruger MP: Climate Timeline

• Timeline
• Votes
• Speeches
• Tweets
• Contact

Danny Kruger's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Danny Kruger

• 30 Mar 2024: Tweet

  All credit to Matthew Parris for making the honest case for assisted suicide: that old people should be killed to save society the cost of looking after them. Maybe their bodies could then be turned into green energy? A modest proposal https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/7ac1f4c5-63b2-4df7-b504-74b1e30f0fc2?shareToken=3e8d37fa00d5adca1f67a7d83f70657b [Source]

• 22 Nov 2023: Tweet

  "climate emergency, pandemics, fundamentalist ideologies, population mobility and the technological revolution are quite indifferent to borders. The world is more than a spherical marketplace... and a map of 195 countries minding their own business behind picket fences." 2/7 [Source]

• 19 Oct 2022: Vote

  Ban on Fracking for Shale Gas Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 23 May 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  I will be brief, because I want to make a simple point in support of the new offence of locking on. I am conscious that the debate has in a sense become a sort of proxy for an argument about how seriously we take the threat of the climate crisis, and I do not want to go down that road. I acknowledge that people on the other side are very sincere in this, including Roger Hallam, who is the principal villain of this debate. I know Roger Hallam slightly—I have met and talked to him—and I respect his views. There are people who want to tear down our society and who are essentially revolutionary in their intent, but I do not think that he or the people who work with him are those people. He does have an absolute sense, however, that our civilisation is under threat unless we take radical action to change our economy, and he is entitled to that opinion. The question is how far it is appropriate to go in support of that cause.

  The question of climate change and the tactics that we are discussing may be new, but it is an old debate. As we have heard, this place has experienced enormous protests over the years and the streets outside have known crowds of tens of thousands—hundreds of thousands—of people protesting against the Government. The question is about the action that can be taken by those protesters. Historically in this country, we had a clear distinction between what was acceptable and what was not, which was a distinction between what was called moral force and physical force.

  I end with the observation that the protesters we are dealing with, even if they have honourable intent and they are entitled to their opinion—who knows, they might be right about the climate crisis—are not allowed to use our tradition of liberty against us. It is necessary to update the law to criminalise that form of protest.

  Full debate: Public Order Bill

• 16 May 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  The threats are very real. We have seen in this century already how precarious our financial system is. We have seen very recently what a pandemic can do to global health and economic systems. We are witnessing now the appalling reality of war in Europe and the real threat of nuclear war. I think also of the threat of technological collapse triggered by accident or sabotage, and of the prospect, even if we do not fully believe the prophets of the apocalypse, of what climate change could do to the developing world, inducing extraordinary upheaval and the prospect of hundreds of millions of people on the move, heading for our safe and temperate continent. We face a series of very real threats to our country and to our civilisation.

  Full debate: Making Britain the Best Place to Grow Up and Grow Old

• 11 Jan 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  There is one option that I have not heard mentioned today, although according to news reports last year it was probably being considered then. I refer to the policy of what is called a carbon fee and dividend. The fundamental challenge that we face, given our net zero commitments, is to reduce carbon emissions without hurting low-income families and the economy more generally. One way of doing that is to ensure that as we tax carbon emissions—as we bear down on carbon using fiscal levers—the income that is generated for the Treasury is reallocated directly to families, and to low-income families in particular, in the form of a carbon dividend or climate income, as it is sometimes called. Other countries have been experimenting with this. I accept that it is quite a statist solution and one that might not come naturally to Conservative Members, but I think it is worth considering the option of enabling the income from carbon taxation to go directly to low-income families.

  Full debate: Household Energy Bills: VAT

• 13 Dec 2021: Vote

  Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 21 Sep 2021: Tweet

  RT @BorisJohnson: Future generations will judge us on our actions in the coming months. We must not fail them. @COP26 | #UNGA https://t.c… [Source]

• 07 Jun 2021: Vote

  Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 28 May 2021: Tweet

  RT @griffitha: As ???????? #NetZero Business Champion, I’m thrilled to launch our campaign asking businesses to commit to reducing their emission… [Source]

• 26 May 2021: Vote

  Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 20 Feb 2021: Tweet

  Great to host the Wiltshire Climate Summit yesterday - with @Minette_Batters @ClaireClimate @griffitha and a host o… https://t.co/zi35C7GP95 [Source]

• 13 Jan 2021: Vote

  Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 08 Dec 2020: Vote

  Delegated Legislation — Financial Assistance to Industry - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye

• 16 Nov 2020: Vote

  Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 12 Oct 2020: Vote

  Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye

• 29 Sep 2020: Vote

  United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 02 Jul 2020: Tweet

  V good to join 30 constituents to discuss climate change on Tuesday - quick write-up here - ⁦@TheCCoalition⁩ https://t.co/tlHgMAyHUA [Source]

• 05 Feb 2020: Vote

  Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No

• 29 Jan 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  Claire is now focusing on the presidency of COP26, the UN climate conference that the UK is hosting in Glasgow in November. This vital role is crucial for the future of our country and the world. I wish her all the very best in this, and I thank her for her work locally and for her friendship to me.

  Full debate: Policing and Crime