VoteClimate: Dave Doogan MP: Climate Timeline

Dave Doogan MP: Climate Timeline

Dave Doogan is the SNP MP for Angus and Perthshire Glens.

We have identified 10 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2019 in which Dave Doogan could have voted.

Dave Doogan is rated Good for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)

  • In favour of action on climate: 6
  • Against: 0
  • Did not vote: 4

Compare to other MPs:

Why don't you Contact Dave Doogan MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?

Dave Doogan's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Dave Doogan in the last 90 days

See Full History

  • 3 Mar 2025: Parliamentary Speech

    I will crack on with new clause 2, as it relates to the Government’s catastrophic management of the fiscal regime for Scotland’s oil and gas. In December, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund touched €1.7 trillion, but Scotland is no wealthier now in real terms than we were when North sea oil and gas was discovered in the 1970s. More than £400 billion has flowed from Scottish waters to the Treasury over the years, with very little coming back the other way. Rather than reverse that trend, the Labour party has chosen to accelerate it with an increase in the energy profits levy. The windfall tax was supposed to apply to the extraordinarily high profits from the high global oil price that preceded its introduction, but that level has long since gone. Through its changes to the EPL, the Labour party jeopardises investment and, in doing so, the future of our skilled offshore energy workforce and our ability to hit net zero.

    Analysis from Offshore Energies UK shows that the increase to and extension of the EPL risk costing the economy £13 billion, which will in turn cost up to 35,000 jobs. The analysis also shows a reduction in viable capital investment offshore from £14.1 billion to £2.3 billion in the period 2025 to 2029 as a result of the changes that the Government are planning in the EPL. That loss of economic value impacts not only on the core sector itself but on the domestic onshore supply companies, many of which are in my constituency, and many of which will have a role to play in the just transition. That reflects a political choice by the Labour party to deprioritise investment in the decarbonisation agenda. Rather than allow a more valuable decarbonisation relief as the solitary positive by-product of its tax hike, Labour has ensured that there can be absolutely no silver lining to this policy cloud.

    The simple truth is that the UK cannot meet the net zero targets or create green growth if the Labour party’s policies hack away at both investment and the domestic workforce that we need to deliver the energy transition. It is clear that the Labour party is abandoning Scotland’s existing energy sector, and putting at risk the just transition in the process. With those changes to the EPL, Labour will have created a worst-of-all-worlds scenario whereby it starves industry of investment, sacrifices the jobs that we need to deliver net zero, puts at risk our energy security, will not bring down energy bills, and harms the economy of Scotland, while failing to invest the money required to truly deliver the benefits that we all need to see from the just transition.

    Analysis from OEUK shows that the oil and gas sector’s total tax yield will peak in 2026 under Labour’s increase in the EPL before declining, compared with the previous scenario, in which Treasury receipts continued to increase over the period. The analysis shows that while the expected tax take from UK oil and gas producers would increase in the very short term, ultimately it will result in a £12 billion net loss to tax receipts compared with the current regime. If the Labour party does not care about the jobs that the policy will cost, the harm it will do to the just transition or the damage to the economy of Scotland, surely Labour can accept that a tax increase that actually reduces the amount of tax received is, at best, counterproductive. That is why the SNP will support new clause 2 if it is pressed to a Division.

    Full debate: Finance Bill

  • 04 Feb 2025: Tweet

    RT @JohnSwinney: Scotland has vast renewable energy resources, and fantastic innovation to harness them. I saw this in action at the world… [Source]
  • 08 Jan 2025: Tweet

    RT @JohnSwinney: Massive boost to Scotland’s economy and our journey to Net Zero with the announcement of £800m investment in battery stora… [Source]
  • 7 Jan 2025: Parliamentary Speech

    The hon. Member for Livingston also talked about energy. He should go up to the north-east of Scotland to talk about energy: we are six months into this Government and there is no evidence whatever of GB Energy making any impact in Scotland. The last time I checked, it had one employee and was based in Manchester. The hon. Member also talked about the investment that would be realised. Somehow, the Acorn project in Scotland —the most deliverable carbon capture, usage and storage project across GB—is still not being funded by the Labour Government, despite their funding a further two CCUS projects in England, in addition to the two already there. Sadly, it is England 4, Scotland 0—it is like a football match.

    Full debate: Budget: Scotland

  • 17 Dec 2024: Tweet

    RT @SeamusLoganMP: Today I raised the important issue of CCUS funding for the Acorn Project in my constituency. The UK Government needs to… [Source]

Maximise your vote to save the planet.

Join Now