VoteClimate: Mary Creagh MP: Climate Timeline

Mary Creagh MP: Climate Timeline

Mary Creagh is the Labour MP for Coventry East.

We have identified 20 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2010 in which Mary Creagh could have voted.

Mary Creagh is rated Good for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)

  • In favour of action on climate: 11
  • Against: 1
  • Did not vote: 8

Compare to other MPs:

Why don't you Contact Mary Creagh MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?

Mary Creagh's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Mary Creagh in the last 90 days

See Full History

  • 9 Dec 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    Let me begin with the strategy. We want to have an economy-wide transformation of our relationship with our resources, which is all about supporting the Government’s missions to kick-start economic growth, make Britain a clean energy superpower, and accelerate the path to net zero through our efforts to tackle waste crime and take back our streets. To answer the question posed by the hon. Member for Stockton West, preventing food waste is key to my Department, and we are reviewing a range of issues associated with food waste in the supply chain. We hope to make further announcements soon.

    However, there is much more to do. On Friday, I was delighted to visit Suez’s Malpass Farm facility in Rugby. Working in partnership with Cemex, Suez has provided 1 million tonnes of climafuel from non-recyclable waste, diverting it from landfill and reducing coal consumption in the neighbouring Cemex plant by 75,000 tonnes, thus enabling big industrial decarbonisation. Earlier today, I made a quick trip up to Newark to visit the Curry’s site, which is home to one of its unique repair centres. I saw how Curry’s, a great and proud British company, is using its resources and its market position to repair and refurbish broken phones, laptops and tablets, and I recommend its refurbishment website to anyone looking for a last-minute gift from Santa.

    Such industrial partnerships, working together to maximise the value of resources, demonstrate the role that the resources and waste sector can play in supporting net zero and supporting economic growth. A high-performing resources and waste sector is key to driving a circular economy. However, waste crime threatens this by taking resources away from that circular economy and from the good businesses that want to do the right thing and make those green investments. I know that my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle-under-Lyme (Adam Jogee) is interested in this, and I am glad to see him in his traditional place. Waste crime costs the country £1 billion a year, and we know that 18% of waste may be handled illegally at some point in the waste supply chain. That is around 34 million tonnes of waste every year. We are committed to tackling this scourge.

    We have consulted on expanding the UK emissions trading scheme to include waste incineration and energy from waste, in order to divert plastics away from incineration. We are taking on board responses, and we will detail final policy on that in due course. We are including energy from waste under decarbonisation readiness requirements. We believe that any energy-producing waste facility seeking an environmental permit needs to look at how it will decarbonise. Moving to a circular economy is no small task, but we will do so by working collaboratively, and across this House, building on the policy left by the previous Government.

    Full debate: Waste and Recycling

  • 4 Dec 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    The Government are also investing £208 million to protect the nation from disease outbreaks that threaten the farming industry, our food security and, crucially, human health. All of that is part of the Government’s new deal for farmers. On a UK-wide level, we are working to cut red tape at our borders and get British food exports moving again—protecting farmers from being undercut by shoddy trade deals done by the previous Government. We will lower energy bills for farmers by switching on GB Energy, and introduce grid reform to allow them to plug their renewable energy into the national grid.

    I will quickly make a couple of other points. The hon. Member for Upper Bann mentioned Bovaer, the feed additive. We know that agriculture is one of our largest emitting sectors, and we consider that methane-suppressing feed products are an essential tool in the decarbonisation of the agricultural sector. Bovaer was approved by the Food Standards Agency in April 2024 for use in the UK as a feed additive. The authorisation process assessed evidence about animal health, consumer health and environmental safety, and the evidence that was provided to demonstrate the methane reduction efficacy of the product. Bovaer is fully metabolised by the cow and is not present in milk or meat, so there is no consumer exposure to it. I hope that reassures her about Bovaer.

    I will also discuss the carbon border adjustment mechanism, which was mentioned by the hon. Member for Chichester (Jess Brown-Fuller). Its introduction, including on imports of specific fertiliser products, was announced by the previous Government in December 2023, but it will not come into force until 2027. It is intended to address carbon leakage, which is the movement of production and emissions from one country to another due to different levels of decarbonisation effort. About 70% of UK agrifood imports come from the EU, and fertiliser used by EU farmers will have already faced a carbon price. Many non-EU imports cannot be produced in the UK, so the Treasury expects that the impact on UK farmers will be modest and that there will be no material impact on food prices.

    Full debate: Future of Farming

  • 26 Nov 2024: Tweet

    RT @Ed_Miliband: COP29 showed that Britain is back in the business of global climate leadership. My article for the Guardian???? https://t.… [Source]
  • 22 Nov 2024: Tweet

    RT @Chris_Boardman: Switching just 1 trip a day from ???? to ???? or ????‍♂️ = almost 30% less transport CO2 for the ave UK urban resident. If 1 in… [Source]
  • 22 Nov 2024: Tweet

    RT @Nature4Climate: From the corridors of #COP29 final days: ???????? UK Minister for Nature @MaryCreagh_ highlights Britain’s commitment to tack… [Source]
  • 21 Nov 2024: Tweet

    Busy one at #COP29 nature and biodiversity day. Advocating for forests, nature based solutions and continuing the momentum from COP16 into what will be a vital climate COP in Brazil next year. @cop29_AZ @wwf_uk @susanamuhamad ????Ph: Wilder García / Minambiente https://x.com/MaryCreagh_/status/1859625688493412772/photo/1 [Source]
  • 18 Nov 2024: Tweet

    Great to be at #COP29 alongside our new Special Representatives for Climate and Nature. The United Kingdom is back on the world stage pushing for urgent action on the nature and climate crisis. @rkyte365 @ruthdavis27 https://x.com/MaryCreagh_/status/1858508635275395530/photo/1 [Source]
  • 18 Nov 2024: Tweet

    Great to be at #COP29 alongside our new Special Representatives for Climate and Nature. The United Kingdom is back on the world stage pushing for urgent action on the nature and climate crisis. @rkyte365 @RuthDavies27 https://x.com/MaryCreagh_/status/1858505409776029760/photo/1 [Source]
  • 6 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    We have two navigation authorities, the Canal and River Trust and the Environment Agency. The CRT reports that there were nearly 860 million visits to its canals last year, many of which were repeat visits, with around 10 million individual users each fortnight. That gives a real sense of the scale of the popularity of our canals. Our navigation authorities have a vital role to play in the future. They must help to ensure that this part of our nation’s key infrastructure is resilient to climate change, and they will help to meet net zero targets through sustainable transport and energy generation and contribute to water security through flood mitigation measures and water transfers.

    Full debate: Peak Forest and Macclesfield Canals

  • 6 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    The climate and nature crisis defines our times, and it is the most vulnerable who bear the brunt. Over half of global GDP is moderately or highly dependent on nature. Loss of biodiversity poses a serious risk to global food security by undermining the resilience of many agricultural systems to threats such as pests, pathogens and climate change. The Government are committed to ending poverty on a liveable planet.

    The UK was, however, disappointed that COP16 concluded before reaching an agreement on international strategies for mobilising nature finance. It is only through our international action and leadership that we tackle the twin threats of climate change and biodiversity loss, which threaten growth, our future prosperity and wellbeing.

    Full debate: Biodiversity COP16

  • 11 Oct 2024: Tweet

    Latest UK International Climate Finance results show the vital role our climate programmes play in protecting & restoring nature & supporting the communities most affected by the climate crisis. https://twitter.com/fcdogovuk/status/1844408499616551406 [Source]
  • 9 Oct 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    To comply with the pre-application consultation requirements under the Planning Act 2008, Hinkley Point C must carry out an appropriate consultation about any proposed changes. The decision relating to the project will ultimately be for the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, my right hon. Friend the Member for Doncaster North (Ed Miliband) to make. I am confident that he will do so correctly, in line with the requirements of the Planning Act. However, in doing so, he will need to consider all relevant issues. They include whether the proposed compensation is required and if it is, whether it is proportionate to the detrimental impact on fish populations of not fitting the acoustic fish deterrent. The planning guidance is clear: Ministers and officials should approach all such decisions with an open mind, based on the evidence presented to them, objectively and without having or giving the appearance of having any predetermined views on the merits or otherwise of the case. I am sure that we are all, in this room, seasoned politicians in planning applications.

    I cannot discuss the particular merits of this case, but I want to raise some broader points prompted by some of the issues, because I too have asked questions. I have heard what the hon. Members for Bridgwater and for Wells and Mendip Hills have asked and that has made clear that we must deliver our infrastructure goals in a way that is positive for our natural world and for our wider landscapes. If we are to meet our ambitious targets on nature restoration while accelerating to net zero, we will have to think carefully about how we use our land. That is why the forthcoming land use framework for England will consider cross-governmental issues, such as energy and food security, and how we can expand nature-rich habitats, such as wetlands, peat bogs and forests.

    The proposed Planning and Infrastructure Bill will accelerate house building and infrastructure delivery and streamline the delivery process for critical infrastructure, including accelerating upgrades to the national grid and boosting renewable energy. That will benefit local communities, unlock delivery of our 2030 clean power mission and net zero obligations and ensure our domestic energy security. We will simplify the consenting process for major infrastructure projects and enable new and improved national policy statements to come forward. We will also establish a review process to provide the opportunity for them to be updated every five years, which will give increased certainty to developers and communities.

    We are just as committed to protecting and restoring nature. In England, we are committed to halting the decline in species abundance by 2030 and reversing it by 2042. We are also committed to reducing the risk of species extinction and we will restore and create more than half a million hectares of wildlife-rich habitat by 2042. Delivering those targets sits at the heart of our mission to ensure nature’s recovery. We will look to reduce pressures on species and protected sites, such as pollution and climate change, and we will take action to recover specific species.

    Full debate: Proposed Salt Marshes: Pawlett Hams

Maximise your vote to save the planet.

Join Now