Nus Ghani MP: Climate Timeline
Nus Ghani is the Conservative MP for Sussex Weald.
We have identified 19 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2015 in which Nus Ghani could have voted.
Nus Ghani is rated for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)
- In favour of action on climate: 0
- Against: 18
- Did not vote: 1
Compare to other MPs:
Why don't you Contact Nus Ghani MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?
Nus Ghani's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes
We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Nus Ghani in the last 90 days
See Full History
-
28 Jan 2025: Parliamentary Speech
First, I thank EFRA Ministers for the work they have done on this Bill, and for everything they have been doing in working on the consultation. It is quite clear to most of the public that not only is England’s privatised model of water failing, but it is an extreme ideological outlier. It is one of the worst for costs and results. [ Interruption. ] The hon. Member for Broadland and Fakenham (Jerome Mayhew) is chuntering away in his place. We need a long-term, patient approach, especially given the climate crisis, and that is fundamentally incompatible with privatisation.
Full debate: Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords]
-
10 Dec 2024: Parliamentary Speech
To recap the measures in the Bill, clause 15 increases the rate of the energy profits levy from 35% to 38%, bringing the headline tax rate on the sector up to 78%. Clause 16 removes the 29% investment allowance and reduces the rate of the decarbonisation investment allowance to 66%, so that the cash value of that allowance remains the same. Clause 17 extends the energy profits levy to 2030, at which point the Government are committing to implementing a successor regime to respond to price shocks once the levy expires. Clause 18 and schedule 3 legislate for certain payments into decommissioning funds to be treated as decommissioning expenditure so that they can attract tax relief.
The Government have thankfully carried out a partial U-turn, retaining the decarbonisation allowance and the 100% first-year allowance introduced by the Conservative party, but if they were persuaded of the importance of those investment allowances and that removing them would do more harm than good, why persist with removing the main 29% investment allowance? What was it about that relief compared with the others that made them want to scrap it?
Full debate: Finance Bill