VoteClimate: Alistair Carmichael MP: Climate Timeline

Alistair Carmichael MP: Climate Timeline

Alistair Carmichael is the Liberal Democrat MP for Orkney and Shetland.

We have identified 30 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2010 in which Alistair Carmichael could have voted.

Alistair Carmichael is rated Medium for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)

  • In favour of action on climate: 20
  • Against: 6
  • Did not vote: 4

Compare to other MPs:

Why don't you Contact Alistair Carmichael MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?

Alistair Carmichael's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Alistair Carmichael in the last 90 days

See Full History

  • 16 Jan 2025: Parliamentary Speech

    I thank everybody who has attended. For the benefit of the Backbench Business Committee, who may run the rule over these things, we have had no fewer than 17 Members in the Chamber in the course of this debate, covering the length and breadth of the country. The hon. Member for Truro and Falmouth (Jayne Kirkham) said there was unity in the message; it was almost as if we had been briefed in these matters. This allows me to place on record my appreciation—shared by all who are engaged in this issue, I am sure—of the work of the UK Marine Energy Council, RenewableUK, Scottish Renewables, and in particular, the companies that get the devices in the water. Their commitment and dedication to decarbonisation and the development of this most important sector is nothing short of inspirational. I extend my gratitude to them and everyone who has contributed today.

    Full debate: Marine Renewables Industry

  • 28 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    The fishing industry understands the need for change. Fishers are not blind to the realities of climate change; they see its effects day and daily in their own nets. The loss of cod in some parts of the North sea seems to be down to the changing temperature of the sea, which is having a real effect. The industry is also, ironically, part of the answer. The fish caught by our fishing industry are a good source of protein caught in a sustainable way in a low-carbon-emitting industry. In the rush to tackle climate change, there seems to be a determination to squeeze out some of the people who are most able to help us to move to that future.

    Full debate: Fishing Industry

  • 6 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    I have two problems with that approach. First, it will leave a lot of people in fuel poverty for another three years while they wait for the money to come. Secondly, if the money comes at all, we will be shovelling it into wheelbarrows to get it out over the two years, a situation that always brings the law of unintended consequences into play, as we have seen time and again with energy efficiency measures, renewable energy development and so on. There is money that must be spent within a target time, but there is neither the existing labour force nor the skills base to deliver the work, so a whole load of fly-by-night companies are set up that come into our communities from outside, do substandard work, go away and eventually go bankrupt while constituents are left to pick up the pieces.

    The two existing vehicles for alleviating fuel poverty—the warm home discount, which reduces bills by £150 a year for those who qualify, and the energy company obligation, which assists people with energy efficiency adaptations, renewable energy adaptations and so on—are both means-tested, which takes us back to the question of cliff edges. Most concerningly of all, those measures are due to end in 2026 unless they are renewed by the Government. The Minister will have an easier conversation with the Treasury if he bears it in mind that the funding for the schemes comes not from the Treasury but from the energy companies.

    Full debate: Fuel Poverty

  • 4 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    There are already very low margins on every farm, including those in Mid Buckinghamshire. Will the addition of between £50 and £75 a tonne on the price of fertiliser, through the Government’s proposed carbon tax, increase food prices? Who will shoulder that burden? Will it be the farmer, or will it be the consumer?

    Full debate: Budget: Implications for Farming Communities

  • 31 Oct 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    The development of marine renewable energy is getting close to commercial deployment. If we are able to get it across the line, it will bring with it a supply chain that we can build and hold in this country, with a view to exports across the world. That would surely be a great result for any industrial strategy. What will the Government do to ensure that their industrial strategy helps marine renewables reach full commercial deployment?

    Full debate: Industrial Strategy

Maximise your vote to save the planet.

Join Now