VoteClimate: Chris Philp MP: Climate Timeline

Chris Philp MP: Climate Timeline

Chris Philp is the Conservative MP for Croydon South.

We have identified 19 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2015 in which Chris Philp could have voted.

Chris Philp is rated Anti for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)

  • In favour of action on climate: 0
  • Against: 19
  • Did not vote: 0

Compare to other MPs:

Why don't you Contact Chris Philp MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?

Chris Philp's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Chris Philp

  • 6 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    There are 120 conflicts globally, which, along with other factors such as poverty, food insecurity and the effects of climate change, cause populations to move. Does the Minister agree that, as my hon. Friend the Member for Hazel Grove (Lisa Smart) pointed out, it is essential that we look at the root causes of immigration? Does she therefore support an increase in the development and aid budget, rather than the cut in official development assistance in last week’s Budget?

    Full debate: Small Boat Crossings

  • 24 Oct 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    North Lincolnshire council has just published proposals for a green growth zone, which will help to revitalise the local economy, provide engineering jobs and help young people to find a route into the renewable energy sector. As that appears to fit perfectly with the Government’s growth agenda, will the Leader of the House arrange a statement, or preferably a debate in Government time, on green growth zones across the country?

    I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman welcomes the green growth zone in his constituency. He is right to point out that this Government’s mission to be a clean energy superpower by 2030 is critical not just to reaching climate targets, but to creating the jobs of the future, boosting growth and giving us the energy security that we so desperately need. I am sure that the topic he suggests would make for an important debate. Perhaps it can be arranged through the Backbench Business Committee when it is up and running, which will hopefully happen imminently. If not, I will certainly look at his request.

    We recently had a debate in Opposition time on farming, and the important issues that the hon. Lady describes get raised here regularly. This Government support our farmers, support our food security and recognise the difficult period that farmers have faced, especially with climate change. That is why we want to support our resilience and ensure we tackle issues around climate change. There will be ample time for these matters to be raised in the Budget debate, so I encourage the hon. Lady to put in to speak.

    Full debate: Business of the House

  • 17 Oct 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    This week is Flood Action Week, an important opportunity to raise awareness of this crucial issue. This week, sadly, North Herefordshire has been subject to flooding: roads are closed, schools are closed and soil is washing off the fields into the roads and rivers. Unfortunately, climate change is making these events more frequent and more extreme. Does the Leader of the House agree that farmers are crucial partners in tackling flooding through natural flood management? Will she make time for a debate in Government time on the crucial issue of flood prevention and action?

    The hon. Lady raises an important matter that has already been raised today. She and other colleagues are making a very good case for a debate on flood resilience and flood action. She is right to say that climate change is having a profound effect on those issues, which is why the Government are committed to becoming a clean energy superpower by 2030. I am sorry to hear about what is happening in her constituency; I have already taken note of the early calls for a debate.

    Last night, the University of Exeter, the Met Office and Peers for the Planet launched the latest edition of “The Parliamentarians’ Guide to Climate Change”, which is a vital resource for us all. Will the Leader of the House welcome that report, as I do, and will she commend it to Members of this House and the other House?

    Full debate: Business of the House

  • 10 Oct 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    Around half a million people rely on heat networks, which is good in achieving our climate goals, but heat networks are not included in the Ofgem price cap. My constituents in Craigmillar are therefore facing a 400% increase in their energy bills. That is terrifying for them and completely unacceptable. Heat networks should have the same protections as traditional heating systems. Will the Leader of the House allow a debate in Government time so that we can address this terrible anomaly?

    That very important matter has been raised with me before and I know that it is of real concern to my hon. Friend and to many other colleagues across this House. Next week’s Westminster Hall debate on the community benefits of renewable energy projects may provide him with an opportunity to raise it, but if not I will ensure that he gets a good response from the Minister.

    Full debate: Business of the House

  • 12 Sep 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    We make no apology for removing that moratorium, because it is absolutely critical that we increase the capacity of wind and clean energy in this country to lower bills and give us the energy security and independence that is crucial to the future of our economy and our wellbeing. The hon. Gentleman might want to raise this issue at Energy Security and Net Zero questions, which will take place on 8 October.

    Full debate: Business of the House

  • 25 Jul 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero is trumpeting that 76% of the electorate are right behind GB Energy, and why would they not be? Why would they not want a state-owned energy company such as Ørsted, Vattenfall or Equinor delivering for people across these islands? But it is not that, is it? It is a cynical, snake oil exercise to gift-wrap a Department that already exists, and it will not deliver energy across these islands at all. Can we have a debate in Government time about why GB Energy is nothing short of smoke and mirrors?

    Full debate: Business of the House

  • 18 Jul 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    Another issue that must be urgently addressed is our commitment to reach net zero. The report published today by the Climate Change Committee makes clear that the days of U-turning on climate commitments and diluting environmental targets must come to an end. Only a third of the emissions reductions required to achieve our 2030 target are currently covered by credible plans. The Liberal Democrats are committed to the bold, urgent action needed to tackle climate change, cut energy bills and create hundreds of thousands of secure, well-paid jobs. The Conservatives’ lack of ambition relinquished our place as a global environmental leader. With COP29 nearing, the UK has a golden opportunity to turbocharge global climate change policies.

    On net zero, there will be the opportunity to question the Energy Secretary later. We have a really ambitious plan to get to net zero and be a clean energy superpower by 2030, and we have already started that programme. We have lifted the moratorium on onshore wind, we have agreed to planning applications for more solar in the past week than—taken together—has ever happened in our country’s history before and we have begun the process to establish Great British Energy.

    Planning on the green belt is a huge concern in my constituency of Fylde—housing is part of it, but there are also the Morgan and Morecambe wind farm proposals. Most residents back the new renewable energy being built off the Fylde coast, but there are concerns about the cabling and substation route, which appears to take the route of least resistance. It will see miles of farmland and countryside dug up, and substations built in inappropriate locations. We seem to be unable to get answers from the company on why that has been chosen as the preferred route, when other far more appropriate routes for cabling and substations exist. Will the Leader of the House assure me that the Government will work with us to get answers from the company and clarity about the other routes that could be used for the cabling, and to ensure that it works with me, local campaigners and the council to get the most appropriate route?

    Full debate: Business of the House

  • 22 Apr 2024: Tweet

    All talk and no delivery as usual from the SNP Nationalists. UK Govt quietly getting on with delivering (eg sustained and large CO2 reductions; virtually ending coal electricity generation; huge increase in renewables since 2010) https://twitter.com/CPhilpOfficial/status/1782437142041387404/photo/1 [Source]
  • 20 Apr 2024: Tweet

    Great speech to Croydon Conservatives by @ClaireCoutinho last night on energy. Use of our own North Sea oil and gas while we transition to net zero by 2050 will save us money and avoid importing more oil and gas than necessary from potentially unreliable places around the world https://twitter.com/CPhilpOfficial/status/1781614049773465691/photo/1 [Source]
  • 23 Sep 2023: Tweet

    RT @jamespaulwise: The worrying mistake made by this programme, groups like Just Stop Oil, & Chris below, is to approach climate change as… [Source]
  • 20 Sep 2023: Tweet

    RT @10DowningStreet: Today we're adopting a new approach to Net Zero that is pragmatic, proportionate and realistic – meeting upcoming targ… [Source]
  • 6 Jun 2023: Parliamentary Speech

    Let me address one or two of the points that the hon. Member for East Lothian made at the start of his speech about the United Kingdom’s aspirations around renewable energy and the progress that we have made in that area. Members will be aware that, back in 2012—just 11 years ago—43% of this country’s electricity generation was from coal-fired power stations, the most polluting form of power generation. Last year, it was just 1.5%, which is a fantastic reduction. If other countries emulated our example, things would be a lot better.

    Full debate: Immigration Rules: Offshore Workers

  • 03 May 2023: Tweet

    The UK has cut CO2 emissions by more than any other major western economy since 2010. Oddly, the eco-protesters and media rarely (if ever) mention this https://x.com/CPhilpOfficial/status/1653670400432168960/photo/1 [Source]
  • 15 Mar 2023: Tweet

    RT @CCHQPress: Between 1990 and 2021, we have cut our emissions by almost 48%, decarbonising faster than any other G7 country, while growin… [Source]
  • 19 Oct 2022: Vote

    Ban on Fracking for Shale Gas Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 13 Jun 2022: Parliamentary Speech

    As well as championing the UK as a global digital hub, the Government also recognise the power of digital technology to transform our own economy, boost jobs and help to level up regions across the UK. Britain’s digital might has given us the flexibility to adapt to unprecedented challenges, such as the covid-19 pandemic, and will be vital in our fight against climate change. Indeed, the UK’s economic future, our security, our standard of living and our place in the world are all reliant on our continued success in digital technology. We can take steps now to futureproof our economy, to invest in developing world-class expertise, to build our evidence base, to boost innovation, to grow employment opportunities across the UK and to strengthen transnational ties.

    Full debate: UK Digital Strategy

  • 13 Dec 2021: Vote

    Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 29 Oct 2021: Tweet

    This is a really good thread on UK and climate change https://t.co/sOxzqkDmVg [Source]
  • 07 Jun 2021: Vote

    Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 26 May 2021: Vote

    Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 13 Jan 2021: Vote

    Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 08 Dec 2020: Vote

    Delegated Legislation — Financial Assistance to Industry - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye
  • 16 Nov 2020: Vote

    Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 12 Oct 2020: Vote

    Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye
  • 29 Sep 2020: Vote

    United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 3 Mar 2020: Parliamentary Speech

    Strong points have been made about the law needing to be enforced, but the Government are continually dragged through the courts for failing to meet their air quality responsibilities, so when are we going to see Ministers pursued by the police to tackle the climate emergency? There cannot be one law for one set of people; surely it has to be the same law for everybody.

    The Government have an extremely proud record on climate change. As I have just said, we have been reducing our CO 2 emissions and have virtually eliminated coal-fired power stations. There is scope to do more, though, and the Environment Bill will again be before the House shortly, and it contains further measures, including on clean air, which I am extremely interested in as a London MP.

    The country can be proud of its record on climate change and the Government will continue to do more. Moreover, the Government fully recognise, respect and embrace the right to peaceful protest. A free society is built on the foundations of free speech and free protest, and the Government will never do anything to impede the public’s right to express their views. Indeed, we have seen that outside, in Parliament Square, on quite a frequent basis over the past year—sometimes quite noisily.

    Full debate: Climate Protests in Cambridge: Police Response

  • 28 Feb 2020: Tweet

    RT @occupcakeswi: Our local MP @CPhilpOfficial has signed his #ClimateChange pledge on our #greenheart to #showthelove for the planet ???????? @T… [Source]
  • 05 Feb 2020: Vote

    Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 10 Oct 2019: Tweet

    RT @OliverCooper: Well said, @GrantShapps. Since 2010, the UK has cut CO2 emissions by 50% more than ANY other G20 country. It really is th… [Source]
  • 25 Jun 2019: Vote

    Delegated Legislation — Value Added Tax - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye
  • 12 Jun 2019: Tweet

    RT @Conservatives: ???????? Britain has become the first major economy in the world to commit to NET ZERO carbon emissions. ???? Our new laws aim t… [Source]
  • 01 May 2019: Tweet

    RT @OliverCooper: Since 2010, the UK has cut CO2 emissions by 50% more than any other G20 country and increased use of renewables six-fold.… [Source]
  • 06 Sep 2016: Vote

    Finance Bill — VAT on Installation of Energy Saving Materials - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 09 May 2016: Vote

    Housing and Planning Bill — Planning obligations and affordable housing - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye
  • 03 May 2016: Vote

    Housing and Planning Bill — Neighbourhood right of appeal - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye
  • 14 Mar 2016: Vote

    Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 8 — Decarbonisation target range - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 14 Mar 2016: Vote

    Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 3 — Carbon capture and storage strategy for the energy industry - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 5 Jan 2016: Parliamentary Speech

    The new clause would also remove the curtilage catch-all and deter homeowners who can afford to turn up the heating but must not. Instead, they could do better things to help fight climate change and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels. It is only a tiny amendment, so, not surprisingly, it is opposed by Historic England, which fears that the odd feature it has forgotten to list might be, what—insulated? It knows that things have to change and that we need to follow the success of the climate talks in Paris with practical changes. If the Government have a better way of delivering the curtilage removal, I will gladly withdraw the amendment and thank them on behalf of all our children and grandchildren.

    Full debate: Housing and Planning Bill

  • 26 Oct 2015: Vote

    Finance Bill (Ways and Means) (Payment of Corporation Tax) — Chapter 5 — Supplementary provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: No
  • 08 Sep 2015: Vote

    Bill Presented — Devolution (London) Bill — Clause 45 — CCL: removal of exemption for electricity from renewable sources - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye
  • 14 Jul 2015: Vote

    21. Climate Change Levy: Removal of Exemption for Electricity from Renewable Sources - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye

Maximise your vote to save the planet.

Join Now