VoteClimate: Judith Cummins MP: Climate Timeline

Judith Cummins MP: Climate Timeline

Judith Cummins is the Labour MP for Bradford South.

We have identified 19 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2015 in which Judith Cummins could have voted.

Judith Cummins is rated Very Good for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)

  • In favour of action on climate: 15
  • Against: 0
  • Did not vote: 4

Compare to other MPs:

Why don't you Contact Judith Cummins MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?

Judith Cummins's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Judith Cummins in the last 90 days

See Full History

  • 05 Mar 2025: Tweet

    Congratulations to the incredible students from @AppletonAcademy who had some of their poetry exhibited on display in the House of Commons! The inspiring poems reflected on young people's concerns about climate change and their vision for the future. Congratulations! https://x.com/JudithCummins/status/1897257077925683469/photo/1 [Source]
  • 24 Feb 2025: Parliamentary Speech

    It is a pleasure to contribute this evening. I will speak in favour of the Bill and address some of the amendments and new clauses, although there probably is not time to address them all. The Bill is an important and necessary step to help the Government take speedy action to tackle the climate emergency, and to help ensure energy security. It modernises the management of the Crown Estate, as we have heard, which potentially is a sleeping giant of green energy provision. The estate is responsible for vast amounts of coastal land and seabed, which have enormous potential to deliver wind power and other renewables.

    Tackling the climate emergency is a significant challenge, but it is achievable. However, we need to step up to the challenge, and the Bill is part of a wider transformation of Government policy to do exactly that. As we heard in Committee, the Bill is urgently needed because although the Crown Estate has enormous potential, the rules governing its management are unduly restrictive. For example, the Crown Estate Act 1961, which governs the estate’s management of its resources, sets out rules that would now be deemed inappropriate for holding very large cash balances. That makes it difficult for the Crown Estate to work with private investors to develop new wind energy and to transmit urgently needed new power to the grid. There is a clear need for these measures. I hope that, after sufficient debate, it is time for the Bill to make further progress.

    Equally, amendment 5 is unnecessary. It would ask the Crown Estate when reviewing the impact of its work to consider the impact on net zero targets, regional economic development and energy security. However, it is clear that the whole Bill is intended to tackle the challenge of addressing and eventually reaching net zero. Referencing specific targets risks further complicating what is already an important Bill that has had considerable discussion in Committee.

    As my right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary said at an earlier stage, this is an important Bill to help the UK achieve our climate targets, and it is a significant step forward in helping us retain energy security. It is time for the whole House to support it.

    Full debate: Crown Estate Bill [Lords]

    To be clear, the cumulative impact of the changes that the hon. Member for Ynys Môn is suggesting in her new clause would likely be to significantly delay the pathway to net zero.

    I think the right hon. Member has misunderstood the point I was making. If we were to have a devolved entity, it would be starting from scratch midway through a multimillion-pound commercial tendering process, just at a time when the Crown Estate is undertaking critical investment in the UK’s path towards net zero—something I am sure she is keen to support.

    I seek assurance that the ambitious net zero targets will not detrimentally affect the fishing sector. I remember some years ago there was talk of a wind farm just off the coast of Kilkeel, and the fishermen were concerned that it would be in one of their prime fishing sectors, where scallops were plentiful. If that continued, the fishing sector could lose out because the Government decided to push for net zero. I sought reassurance that Northern Ireland MPs would be able to contact the Northern Ireland commissioner directly, but I ask specifically for a wider assurance about the fishing sector in Northern Ireland—for Portavogie, Ardglass and Kilkeel.

    Full debate: Crown Estate Bill [Lords]

Maximise your vote to save the planet.

Join Now