Nick Timothy MP: Climate-Related Speeches In Parliament
Nick Timothy is the Conservative MP for West Suffolk.
We have identified 0 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2024 in which Nick Timothy could have voted.
Nick Timothy is rated n/a for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)
- In favour of action on climate: 0
- Against: 0
- Did not vote: 0
Compare to other MPs:
Why don't you Contact Nick Timothy MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?
Nick Timothy's Speeches In Parliament Related to Climate
We've found 2 Parliamentary debates in which Nick Timothy has spoken about climate-related matters.
Here are the relevant sections of their speeches.
-
21 Oct 2024: Employment Rights Bill
19:48
Why will the Government do nothing about the international trading system? Countries aiming to run trade surpluses, such as China, hold down their labour costs and destroy industry in deficit countries such as ours. Trade wars, as two authors like to say, are class wars, and the Labour party usually likes to fight a class war, yet this Government want to flood Britain with cheap Chinese electric cars because of the Energy Secretary’s obsession with net zero. That is just one way in which our economic model needs to change, because while the Government’s characterisation of their inheritance is, I am afraid, cynical and wrong, there is a case for economic change, if only the Government were prepared to undertake it. I think the Business Secretary might be one of those capable of doing that, but I am not sure that some of his colleagues are. Today, Ministers could be launching a plan for reindustrialisation, for competitive energy prices, for domestic steel manufacturing and for a strategy taking in better infrastructure, skills and training, planning, regulatory reform and more— [ Interruption. ] Would the hon. Lady like to intervene?
[Source]
-
22 Jul 2024: Economy, Welfare and Public Services
19:13
We need to question economic theory, challenge Treasury orthodoxy and think beyond the intellectual limits of ideological liberalism. Theories like comparative advantage have led us to offshore industry and grow dependent on hostile states, like China. But international trade is neither free nor fair, and net zero cannot mean sacrificing our prosperity and security. Being a services superpower is a great advantage, but alone it is not enough. We need a serious strategy to reindustrialise, narrow the trade deficit and rebalance the economy. We need to change and, in the months and years ahead, I look forward to debating how we do so.
[Source]