VoteClimate: Dr Rupa Huq MP: Climate Timeline

Dr Rupa Huq MP: Climate Timeline

Rupa Huq is the Labour MP for Ealing Central and Acton.

We have identified 19 Parliamentary Votes Related to Climate since 2015 in which Rupa Huq could have voted.

Rupa Huq is rated Very Good for votes supporting action on climate. (Rating Methodology)

  • In favour of action on climate: 17
  • Against: 0
  • Did not vote: 2

Compare to other MPs:

Why don't you Contact Rupa Huq MP now and tell them how much climate means to you?

Rupa Huq's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Rupa Huq

  • 10 Dec 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    As I speak about this huge solar installation in my constituency, hon. Members should make no mistake: I recognise climate change as one of the greatest threats to our planet and way of life. I want us to continue our shift to renewable energy, reduce our carbon footprint and improve our energy security, and that includes solar. I welcome solar on factory and warehouse roofs, housing developments, brownfield sites and even out-of-the-way pockets of poor-quality land. But Cleve Hill is altogether different. When complete, the solar park will cover more than 700 acres—an area larger than the town of Faversham itself. It will have not far off 1 million solar panels, each the height of a double-decker bus. No amount of natural screening can prevent this huge installation from dominating the landscape.

    On all three counts, I seek the Minister’s assurance and action. To be clear, I am not advocating more red tape. This is about doing something better, not making it harder. If we get this right, we can improve how we build energy infrastructure in this country. That is important because we need more renewable energy generation capacity to meet our future energy needs, in a world where economic growth is likely to be dependent on energy-intensive computing power. All our futures depend on that, so let us ensure that we get it right, starting right here, right now, with Cleve Hill solar.

    Full debate: Cleve Hill Solar Park

  • 20 Nov 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    Plastic pollution is putting the Earth’s ecosystems and natural processes under serious strain, worsening climate change, biodiversity loss, ocean acidification and land use—and if you think the situation is bad now, it could be much worse in decades to come. Plastic production, which is already far too high for our planet’s systems to cope with, is set to triple by 2050. The impact on climate change will be monumental. In its current state and with its current growth trajectory, plastic production will make achieving net zero impossible.

    Earlier this year, over 220,000 people decided to take part in the Big Plastic Count—a massive citizen science project where individuals count every piece of plastic waste that they dispose of for a week. The results showed that the UK throws away 1.7 billion pieces of plastic each week, with 58% of that being incinerated, producing toxic fumes and greenhouse gases. Incineration is the UK’s dirtiest form of power generation, and incinerators are three times more likely to be placed in poorer neighbourhoods, as was the case with the one built recently in the Stroud area.

    As I was saying, the Environment Secretary has made zero waste one of the Department’s core missions, and has set up a circular economy taskforce. This is a good move and will create jobs in repair, rental and recycling, as well as will significantly reducing CO2 emissions. The reuse of plastics, and not just recycling, is also incredibly important. It has perhaps dropped down the agenda a little, and we need to emphasise the point, so I thank the hon. Member for Glastonbury and Somerton for her intervention.

    The plastics treaty is the third time in quick succession that this Government’s international climate and nature leadership has been tested. The UK demonstrated our ambitions at the biodiversity COP in Cali, Colombia, and was one of the only countries to announce a genuinely ambitious nationally determined contribution at the COP29 in Baku. The plastics treaty is another vital opportunity for the UK to demonstrate once again that it is a progressive actor on the world stage, prepared to face down polluting industries and to put the brakes on the climate and nature emergency. That leadership role is needed now more than ever, particularly in sustainable energy and in recycling.

    Full debate: Global Plastics Treaty

  • 14 Nov 2024: Tweet

    Excited about my constituent tv's @Konnie_Huq's edited kid's climate change guide, lavishly illustrated with @jamieoliver and @Baddiel amongst contributors. I asked if ministers can help get it in primary schools to spread the word young https://x.com/RupaHuq/status/1857094247549161894/video/1 [Source]
  • 14 Nov 2024: Tweet

    On the occasion of his 76th birthday here’s the King back in 1989 in a climate change feature in Smash Hits, along with Mrs Thatcher @tanita_tikaram and Simon Le Bon! @smashhitsbot https://x.com/RupaHuq/status/1857019951497846987/photo/1 [Source]
  • 13 Nov 2024: Tweet

    RT @McrWritingSchl: Konnie Huq launches free #climatecrisis ebook for UK primary schools: the Guardian covers “Children for Change”, a proj… [Source]
  • 11 Sep 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    I have some questions for the Minister. As I said, there is a big job to do. Given our unique role in all this, we should offer support. Apparently, the constitution is being amended and redrafted. Could we lend expertise there? British lawyers have good form on this; we constructed the European convention on human rights. Capacity building is needed to cleanse all sorts of institutions of party people who were in the pocket of the last regime. Hendon police training college is renowned all over the world; perhaps we can rebuild the police in Bangladesh, because apparently there has been a bit of a vacuum there recently. The Stormtrooper-like Rapid Action Battalion force should be disbanded, and the death penalty should be gone. Maybe we could do something about climate finance, because countries in the global south face the brunt of climate problems, and we are in the run-up to COP29. These measures do not even have to cost anything; we could put a polluter-pays levy on some countries.

    Full debate: Democracy in Bangladesh

  • 19 Apr 2024: Tweet

    RT @actonw3com: Topical Questions | Energy Security and Net Zero | Commons debates https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2024-04-16c.160.2&p=25284&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter#g165.2 https://twitter.com/actonw3com/status/1781215182611771587/photo/1 [Source]
  • 17 Apr 2024: Tweet

    My constituent did the right thing getting an electric vehicle but the cost of kerbside charging as he's not in a detached house punitive and destroying him Minister who voted AGAINST the zero emission vehicle mandate smugly said he has a driveway How can he be trusted? https://twitter.com/RupaHuq/status/1780594965254643739/video/1 [Source]
  • 16 Apr 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    T7. Thank you, and big hugs, Mr Speaker, for the loss of your father.My constituent Joe Stean did the right thing and switched the family car to electric, but now the cost and lack of charging points have put him into fuel poverty. What are the Government doing to encourage charging options for people who do not live in detached homes? Is it true that the new Minister voted against the zero-emissions vehicle mandate? ( 902312 )

    Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  • 19 Mar 2024: Parliamentary Speech

    Ealing and Acton are richer for having the Navasartian centre in Northfield and the Hayashen centre in Acton, which have both done fundraising for Nagorno-Karabakh refugees, but what are our Government doing? It feels as if, in our post-Brexit world, we are desperate for trade deals. On the role of BP, I would like to ask the Minister how much oil pulls the strings of these relationships. People who did election observation in Baku said that they could smell the oil when they landed; it is all about oil. It is ironic that COP29 will be held in Baku—what an act of greenwashing. Yesterday at the all-party parliamentary group, we heard that the ground was being rendered infertile for flora and fauna by this scorched earth policy.

    Full debate: Nagorno-Karabakh: Armenian Refugees

  • 23 Feb 2024: Tweet

    I spoke in the Economic Affairs, Science, Technology and Environment debate at the @oscepa A wide ranging topic so I covered: recession, AI, net zero #AlexeiNavalny #UkraineRussianWar, condemned Hamas advocated #CeasefireNOW and release of all hostages in Gaza Video to follow: https://twitter.com/RupaHuq/status/1760983725926727723/photo/1 [Source]
  • 24 Jul 2023: Tweet

    RT @DrAyshaRaza: As if we need any further stark reminders of our climate changing abruptly. Green policies, real ones not just the greenwa… [Source]
  • 15 May 2023: Parliamentary Speech

    Anyway, I said that I was going to conclude. I did not even get to the removal of maternity functions of Ealing Hospital in Southall, or the fact that pre-term deaths in pregnancy are experienced four times as much by black mums as by the population at large, and that poorer communities living by main roads breathe more polluted air—plus, in north-west London we have Heathrow airport, which is ever hungry to expand despite the climate crisis. I did not get on to any of that because the debate could have gone on and on, but I will say that acting on health inequalities improves lives and livelihoods, cuts costs to the NHS, to the benefit of wider society, prosperity and the economy, and it would save the Exchequer billions in lost productivity through long-term sickness.

    Full debate: Health Inequalities: North-west London

  • 21 Jan 2023: Tweet

    RT @Banxcartoons: From today's @ftopinion @FT #BonfireEULaws #ClimateCrisis #GlobalWarming #BrexitBrokeBritain #BrexitHasFailed #BrexitDisa… [Source]
  • 19 Oct 2022: Vote

    Ban on Fracking for Shale Gas Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 21 Jul 2022: Parliamentary Speech

    My hon. Friend rightly highlights the importance of agriculture remaining at the heart of the county shows that he eloquently describes. Does he agree that food production must remain at the heart of UK agricultural strategies? That does not mean that we are ignorant of the net zero challenge, and some of the environmental imperatives, but keeping British farmers farming and producing high-quality food must be the overriding goal.

    Full debate: Agricultural and County Shows

  • 21 Jul 2022: Tweet

    I asked the #Cop26 President Alok Sharma MP to make a change to avoid expanding the biggest emitter of C02 in all Europe at the time of our net zero obligations by rethinking the third runway at Heathrow He dodged the question @StopHeathrowExp @NoR3Coalition https://x.com/RupaHuq/status/1550065530240991232/video/1 [Source]
  • 20 Jul 2022: Parliamentary Speech

    T8. The President showed great leadership at COP26, which we all respect him for. Will he do the same again and cut back on a project that is polluting the lungs of both his and my constituents? Will he please revisit the issue of the biggest CO 2 emitter in the whole of Europe and think again about the new runway at Heathrow? ( 901205 )

    Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  • 18 Jul 2022: Parliamentary Speech

    As we have seen today, the PM who as a child wanted to be world king has become King Canute, still defiant and partying to the end, characteristically skipping Cobra meetings—if not quite fiddling while Rome burns, then partying while the country roasts. It brings to mind those suitcases being wheeled down Whitehall on the eve of Prince Philip’s funeral. Meanwhile, our fellow citizens face huge challenges: climate change-induced heatwave, looming strikes, inflation, cost of living crisis, energy crisis, record NHS backlog, passports backlog, Home Office backlog, courts backlog—backlog Britain.

    Full debate: Confidence in Her Majesty’s Government

  • 09 Jul 2022: Tweet

    @edrennie77 @PrisonPlanet Interesting metrics, remember seeing a US one that had climate change down seeing if they supported principle or denied it [Source]
  • 18 May 2022: Parliamentary Speech

    From the content of the Queen’s Speech, we would not know that we are in the midst of a European war, that we are coming out of a global pandemic with a spluttering economy edging perilously close to recession, or that we are in a climate crisis. Instead, what do we have? Ideological hobby horses and populist posturing. We have a higher education Bill consisting of student number controls and a lifelong loan entitlement—more dumbing down than levelling up. Then there is the freedom of speech Bill roundly condemned by everyone in the higher education sector. That is what you get when you have had enough of experts. There is a Bill to curb Insulate Britain, but nothing that would actually help to insulate Britain’s homes. With high streets increasingly boarded up and turning into cash deserts, it is shameful that food bank usage is rocketing but that in Acton banks are an extinct species. TSB has now gone in Ealing, which is going the same way.

    a bunch of ill-considered, ill-timed, unnecessary and nakedly political measures: flogging off that great Thatcher legacy, Channel 4; waging a trade war with the EU; joining Russia—only Russia has done this before—in quitting the ECHR; and regulating street naming. I have knocked on loads of doors over the years every day in the run-up to elections, and no normal person on the doorstep wants any of that. Yet there is nothing to tackle the climate crisis, or to cut energy bills, or to make people more secure at work, or to turn around our struggling economy—none of the stuff that people desperately need.

    Full debate: Achieving Economic Growth

  • 13 Dec 2021: Vote

    Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 3 Nov 2021: Parliamentary Speech

    The Prime Minister has been busy preaching urgency this week at COP26, and I hope that he has caught up with his sleep. When he sits down with his grandchildren one day and they ask, “What did you do in that week of COP26?”, will he be able to outline one action that was in his gift that had an immediate impact? Will he be consistent with what he has always said and done and take on the biggest emitter of CO 2 in the whole of Europe, which greedily and voraciously wants more? Will he ditch his predecessor’s damaging, daft, pre-levelling up, pre-Zoom and pre-90%-drop-in-demand proposal and have a fresh vote in this House to kill off the third runway at Heathrow?

    Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  • 07 Jun 2021: Vote

    Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 26 May 2021: Vote

    Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 13 May 2021: Parliamentary Speech

    There is no renters’ rights legislation here and no new cladding protections: so much for no one losing their home to covid—another discarded assurance from a Prime Minister “never knowingly undersold”. We all remember him lying down in front of the bulldozers to stop Heathrow expansion, but there is nothing here to combat climate change. It is the most important issue of our generation and everyone’s generation, and is particularly championed by the young, as we have seen with Greta Thunberg and the school strikers—although all schools have been away for the last year.

    Full debate: A Brighter Future for the Next Generation

  • 27 Apr 2021: Parliamentary Speech

    How do we reverse the UK’s long-standing, illegally high air pollution? First, we should stop Heathrow expansion. It is incompatible with the UK’s net zero targets. Why add to what is already Europe’s biggest CO 2 emitter, which is doing enormous damage to my constituency and to that of my near neighbour the hon. Member for Twickenham (Munira Wilson) through air and noise pollution? We know that in the new normal we will do things differently, and Zoom works for business meetings, so why not save those air flights for sparingly used leisure travel? The expansion of Charles de Gaulle airport in France has been stopped; we should do the same.

    Full debate: Air Pollution: London

  • 13 Jan 2021: Vote

    Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 16 Nov 2020: Vote

    Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 4 Nov 2020: Parliamentary Speech

    I completely agree that we have a climate emergency, we have our net zero obligations and we have an obesity crisis, but doing this without a consultation has just got people’s backs up. It sometimes feels that these things have been formulated, not by anyone who cycles or understands local traffic flows, but just in order to satisfy the criteria for a budget where there is money available and time is running out.

    Full debate: Covid-19: Emergency Transport and Travel Measures in London Boroughs

  • 12 Oct 2020: Vote

    Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No
  • 29 Sep 2020: Vote

    United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 12 Mar 2020: Parliamentary Speech

    7. Whether he plans to take into account the Paris climate change agreement in future decisions on airport expansion. ( 901495 )

    Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  • 05 Feb 2020: Vote

    Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 28 Jan 2020: Parliamentary Speech

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Hosie. This debate on services in our suburbs is in many ways an SOS, because the voice of the suburbs—the bits at the edges of our cities, rather than those at the centre, or the periphery before the shire counties kick in—has been silenced in current debates about under-investment and fair funding. Instead, considerations of heartlands and the red wall have predominated. I will pose the Minister some questions, and will chiefly address London. However, arguments about suburban neglect by successive Governments apply everywhere outside of the Westminster bubble, in Ealing, Acton and Chiswick, as well as Solihull in Birmingham or Didsbury in Manchester. Those places are all dealing with demographic and economic change, the climate emergency and the housing crisis, among many other issues.

    Connectivity is a key suburban characteristic. Not only do all roads lead to Ealing, Acton and Chiswick, through the arterial network, but we seem to have every major infrastructure project there, bringing boon as well as bane. The Old Oak super-development opportunity area will, in time, provide 24,000 dwellings and an interchange that will be second only to King’s Cross. HS2 has already compulsorily purchased the neighbouring back gardens of people who live there, who feel that that company acts with no humanity at all. They will basically be living in a building site 24/7 for at least the next decade, and with the ever-increasing price tag of that project, many people are wondering whether it is worth it and whether they will live to see its benefits. The same is true for Crossrail, as well as Heathrow expansion—which, if we are sticking to our climate change targets and accepting that we are in a climate emergency, seems completely nuts, given that Heathrow is the biggest emitter of carbon dioxide in Europe.

    Full debate: Local Services: London Suburbs

  • 25 Jun 2019: Vote

    Delegated Legislation — Value Added Tax - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No
  • 2 May 2019: Parliamentary Speech

    Yesterday’s judicial review on Heathrow was concerned only with the legality of the decision, not the merits of airport expansion. Given that this House has overwhelmingly affirmed that we face a climate emergency, surely a swift and easy way of meeting our obligations would be to cancel the third runway at Heathrow. Not only will it pollute my constituents’ lungs, but it is costing us the earth—literally.

    Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  • 8 Jan 2019: Parliamentary Speech

    10. What steps he is taking to support new renewable energy technologies. ( 908437 )

    Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  • 24 Jul 2018: Parliamentary Speech

    Will the Minister tell us what will happen to Altenergy of Chiswick, London, W4? The company wants policy clarity and fair treatment for rooftop solar, which is a popular type of renewable energy. It is cheap and obviously green; it is the most popular thing in the global renewables market. It dominates the market globally, but in this country, our Government seem to be dangerously in hock to the nuclear industry, which is getting all the subsidy. Altenergy is very worried. It used to have large offices, but it has now relocated to a shed belonging to the chief executive officer, Rajiv Bhatia. It has massively downsized. It used to employ 50 people, but it now employs just a handful. Can the Minister give me any assurances about what will happen when the feed-in tariff goes next year? The company wants to know about net metering, which would provide some certainty. There is no indication that the export tariff will be maintained after 1 April. May we have some assurances on that? Quinn McGovern from Elan Global Renewables of Acton, W3, is in a similar predicament. Several of these companies are wondering whether they might be about to go to the wall.

    Full debate: Summer Adjournment

  • 12 Jul 2018: Parliamentary Speech

    The Secretary of State scored a major coup in being the first to interview President-elect Trump. As the Secretary of State has since become a born-again green and the President will touch down on these shores today, will the Secretary of State use all his famous skills of tact and persuasion, as well as that pre-existing special relationship, to impress on the President that climate change is an existential threat to our planet and to persuade him to reverse his disastrous decision to pull out of the Paris climate change accords?

    Full debate: Topical Questions

  • 7 Jun 2018: Parliamentary Speech

    The Foreign Secretary promised to lie down in front of the bulldozers. I cannot see that happening, but even if they do not do that, the Government surely should stand up for our constituents’ health. Air pollution is already appallingly high in our city, and the NPS fails to show how a third runway and all the emissions it will bring will improve that. As it is, 9,000 Londoners a year die prematurely from our toxic air. How is an extra runway going to help that? The current Mayor of London is acting on the issue. He has brought forward things such as the ultra-low emission zone, which the previous Mayor dragged his feet on a bit. All that will be undone, so will the Minister tell us exactly how our climate change obligations will be satisfied following this decision?

    Full debate: Airports National Policy Statement

  • 7 Nov 2017: Parliamentary Speech

    “Decisions on future police funding will be based on evidence, not assertion. Thx to all CCs and PCCs who have helped us update evidence.”

    Full debate: Family Planning Clinics: Public Order Legislation

  • 06 Sep 2016: Vote

    Finance Bill — VAT on Installation of Energy Saving Materials - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 09 May 2016: Vote

    Housing and Planning Bill — Planning obligations and affordable housing - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No
  • 03 May 2016: Vote

    Housing and Planning Bill — Neighbourhood right of appeal - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No
  • 14 Mar 2016: Vote

    Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 8 — Decarbonisation target range - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 14 Mar 2016: Vote

    Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 3 — Carbon capture and storage strategy for the energy industry - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 25 Feb 2016: Parliamentary Speech

    At the time of the last referendum, when I was three, the chief association with Europe was economic: it was the European Economic Community. There is a picture of Mrs Thatcher in a patchwork dress made of European flags. Then in the ’80s, as my right hon. Friend the Member for Leeds Central (Hilary Benn) described, the idea of social Europe took root and attitudes changed on the left. The idea of Europe as a capitalist club was dissolved. On all those and many other fronts—the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas) mentioned climate change, which knows no borders—it is vital for us to stay in Europe, because the case to act with our European partners is compelling.

    Leaving behind our biggest trading partner would put jobs and growth at risk, as Members have said. The mere mention of the date of the referendum caused turmoil in the markets, which should be viewed as a precursor of things to come if the result goes the way of leaving. When I meet Europhobes on doorsteps and ask them which directive is interfering with their lives, they are always at a loss to say anything. It is not the European working time directive; it is not worker protection via maternity or paternity leave; it is not EU competition agreements, which have brought down airline ticket prices and roaming charges. It is by working together with our European partners that we can catch criminals, through mechanisms such as the European arrest warrant. Like climate change, criminals do not operate within national borders.

    Full debate: European Affairs

  • 26 Oct 2015: Vote

    Finance Bill (Ways and Means) (Payment of Corporation Tax) — Chapter 5 — Supplementary provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye
  • 08 Sep 2015: Vote

    Bill Presented — Devolution (London) Bill — Clause 45 — CCL: removal of exemption for electricity from renewable sources - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

Maximise your vote to save the planet.

Join Now