Stephen Kinnock MP: Climate Timeline

• Timeline
• Votes
• Speeches
• Tweets
• Contact

Stephen Kinnock's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Stephen Kinnock

• 17 Nov 2024: Tweet

  At @WelshLabour Conf I chaired a discussion on ensuring green energy projects deliver good jobs for Aberafan Maesteg & Wales. We know ports, businesses, developers & politicians all share that ambition - & UK/Welsh Govts & @TheCrownEstate are listening. Let's make it happen! https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1858209414269784336/photo/1 [Source]

• 20 Aug 2024: Tweet

  RT @JoStevensLabour: Our two Labour Governments are working in partnership to unleash Wales' green energy potential, create new jobs and br… [Source]

• 19 May 2024: Tweet

  Britain can lead world in green energy – such as Floating Offshore Wind in the Celtic Sea – & British steel is needed to underpin this. @RachelReevesMP's Securonomics agenda & Labour’s Steel Fund can seize these opportunities. My comments on @TheNewsAgents Port Talbot special: https://twitter.com/SKinnock/status/1792128441711497580/video/1 [Source]

• 21 Feb 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  It is crystal clear that the plan that is being pushed by Tata Steel and the UK Government fails on three counts. First, it fails on jobs. In the US, Joe Biden’s £290 billion Inflation Reduction Act is creating 170,000 green jobs. In Europe, national Governments are investing billions of euros in decarbonising their single steel plants. The UK is the only country that is throwing thousands of steelworkers on the scrapheap.

  Secondly, the plan fails on decarbonisation. The Tata-Tory plan is based on importing millions of tonnes of semi-finished products from India, where steel production is 30% to 40% more carbon intensive than in the UK. The deal is based on exporting jobs from Wales to India, and importing carbon from India to Wales. You could not make it up.

  Full debate: Steel Industry: Wales

• 17 Feb 2024: Tweet

  Here's why I joined the #SaveOurSteel rally today: The multi-union plan accepts commercial & environmental need to decarbonise, but offers a bridge to the future which supports jobs & protects national security. Labour backs it. Tories are paying £500m for 2,800 job losses. https://twitter.com/SKinnock/status/1758948361854492705/video/1 [Source]

• 23 Jan 2024: Parliamentary Speech

  Let me be absolutely clear: when we look at the deal that is now on the table, we see that it does not work for jobs, it does not work for decarbonisation, and it does not work for our national security. On jobs, 2,800 jobs are set to go, with £500 million of taxpayers’ money to pay for that privilege. On decarbonisation, the deal is based on importing millions of tons of steel from India, where steel production is 30% to 40% more carbon intensive. I am not sure if anyone has noticed, but India is 5,000 miles away, so the carbon footprint will be huge. We are literally exporting jobs from Wales to India, and importing carbon from India to Wales.

  Full debate: Protecting Steel in the UK

• 23 Jan 2024: Tweet

  RT @AliMcDiarmid: Spot on @vaughangething - the UK Govt must reconsider their decarbonisation-on-the-cheap strategy. The Multi-Union Plan c… [Source]

• 28 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: Today we’ve published our multi-union plan to secure a just transition at @TataSteelUK. Community and @GMB_Union com… [Source]

• 14 Nov 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  Just look at the opportunities in floating offshore wind in my Aberavon constituency. FLOW is a prime example of where Wales’s geography offers huge competitive advantage, with the potential to create 16,000 jobs, deliver energy security and lower household bills. But we need central Government to match these ambitions, delivering on the full potential of 20 GW of clean energy by offering a fair strike price for developers in return for ensuring that the manufacturing supply chain jobs are kept here in the UK. If we get this right, Port Talbot could become a green energy and manufacturing hub, with our steelworks making the steel for the floating turbine substructures in a new plate mill, and those very turbines then providing the energy to run the Port Talbot steelworks as well as powering tens of millions of homes across the UK. This bold, ambitious, pioneering plan can become a model for a new economy. South Wales was the cradle of the first industrial revolution, and a Labour Government in Westminster, working in close partnership with the Welsh Labour Government in Cardiff Bay, will put our proud country at the heart of the green industrial revolution.

  Whichever way we look at it, we need to make, buy and sell more in Britain. Labour knows that this begins with the steel industry, with our £3 billion clean steel renewal commitment dwarfing the Government’s dangerously unambitious and short-sighted approach. The Conservatives are failing to understand the growing commercial opportunities that a strong British steel industry would be well positioned to seize, and they are failing to recognise the risks of over-reliance on other countries. Decarbonisation is, of course, important, not least because consumers are increasingly demanding greener products, but decarbonisation must not become a byword for deindustrialisation. It would be utterly unforgiveable if the deal that the Government have done with Tata Steel leads to the offshoring of production, good jobs and carbon emissions to other countries that use dirtier steelmaking processes and that do not always have Britain’s best interests at heart.

  Full debate: Economic Growth

• 24 Oct 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  I welcome the Minister’s statement today and the robust action that the Government are taking. Will he put on record that this country is still open to legal migration routes and that it is just the illegal migration routes that we are tackling? On the issue of the whole of Government approach, we are, of course, tackling the pull factors, but the push factors out of places such as north Africa and sub-Saharan Africa, which he recently visited, include climate change, conflict, famine and poor governance. What more can we do across Government to stop those push factors?

  Full debate: Illegal Migration

• 23 Oct 2023: Tweet

  Yesterday @KeirStarmer met with @CommunityUnion @GMB_union & @unitetheunion union reps in Port Talbot. Keir made it clear that the voice of steelworkers *must* be heard, and that the shift to green steel *must* be based on a just transition to the jobs of the future. https://twitter.com/SKinnock/status/1716393089659441433/photo/1 [Source]

• 19 Oct 2023: Tweet

  RT @vaughangething: A Net Zero economy needs steel; it is the thread that will run through the economy of today and tomorrow. My focus is… [Source]

• 18 Oct 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  So what do we need to do to seize these opportunities? First, we need to make sure that the port infrastructure is built. The port and the prospective developers need certainty. They need assurances that the market will reach its full 24 GW capacity. Of course, the first round of FLOW, as confirmed by the Crown Estate, is only set at 4.5 GW, but it is the long-term line of sight on this and the pipeline that we really need to focus on. Associated British Ports is developing its plans for Port Talbot at pace, investing more than £500 million in developing a major floating offshore wind integration assembly port and a wider green energy hub. But the length of the leasing window by the Crown Estate is of crucial importance. We need a clear outline of the development window to that 24 GW target for flow in the Celtic sea. This is to act as a clear signal in that FLOW global market. Could I ask the Minister to outline the steps he is taking to secure clarity about the long-term pipeline?

  Full debate: Green Energy: Ports

• 09 Oct 2023: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: Under Labour "Decarbonisation will never, ever mean deindustrialisation." Join our campaign to deliver a just transit… [Source]

• 14 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @W3L5H_DR4G0N: Decarbonisation .. YES .... De=Industrialisation .. NO ... All options for steelmaking in Port Talbot must remain on th… [Source]

• 14 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @vaughangething: I have met with the First Minister and Climate Change Minister to discuss today’s media reports. In the interests of… [Source]

• 12 Sep 2023: Tweet

  It was a pleasure to visit @RWE_UK recently and meet some of the team and get briefed on all of all of their exciting plans! I enjoyed seeing their recently renovated Baglan office and learning about the company's pivotal role in Wales’ renewable energy mix. https://twitter.com/SKinnock/status/1701532242948792332/photo/1 [Source]

• 6 Sep 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  Q10. Steel- workers in my constituency have watched in frustration as other Governments have pumped investment into decarbonisation while successive Tory Governments have sat on their hands. When will the Prime Minister finally conclude the talks with Tata Steel? Can he guarantee that level of investment will match what other European Governments are doing on decarbonisation? And will he guarantee that the conclusion will be based on serious engagement, comprehensively with the steel unions? ( 906237 )

  Full debate: Engagements

• 02 Sep 2023: Tweet

  Steel is a strategic industry that underpins our entire economy. It provides tens of thousands of highly skilled jobs, it’s vital for our national security, and it’s key to achieving net zero. Failure to invest in our steel industry would be the very definition of a false economy https://twitter.com/skynews/status/1697970055034642879 [Source]

• 07 Aug 2023: Tweet

  UK is in a global race to produce Green Steel. Transition should be a partnership between Govt, unions & employers. Decarbonisation mustn't mean deindustrialisation. But the economic cost of doing nothing will be far greater. Yet UK Govt fails to grasp scale of challenge 1/2 [Source]

• 18 Jul 2023: Tweet

  ???? Today I co-launched a new report on how UK Govt must support UK steel & manufacturing by introducing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism #CBAM. De-carbonisation cannot mean de-industrialisation. We can't let heavy polluters overseas undercut UK firms https://www.stephenkinnock.co.uk/commission-for-carbon-competitiveness-report/ [Source]

• 17 Jul 2023: Tweet

  "Tata Steel argues that producing lower-carbon (& eventually no-carbon) steel could give British steelmaking a new lease of life." Strong piece from @JJPJolly on what our steel industry needs. In it I argue that we need a just transition for steelworkers https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jul/15/welsh-steelworks-at-breaking-point-over-the-cost-of-cleaning-up-its-act?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other [Source]

• 4 Jul 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  The development of floating offshore wind in the Celtic sea is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for my Aberavon constituency, for Wales and for the entire United Kingdom. Last week, the Climate Change Committee rightly blasted the Government for failing to deliver on their net zero commitment. I am profoundly concerned that floating offshore wind will be squandered due to the lack of grip and direction that the committee described. When will the Minister be bringing forward an industrial strategy for floating offshore wind, which will ensure that Welsh manufacturing and Welsh jobs are placed at the heart of turbine and substructure fabrication, starting with the vital seabed licensing process.

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 29 Jun 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  2. What steps she is taking to help the steel industry to decarbonise. ( 905682 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  Hundreds of steelworkers gathered in Westminster yesterday to make absolutely clear their feeling that the Government are not doing enough, particularly in comparison with competitor nations, when it comes to investment in the transition to decarbonised steel. The numbers do not lie. The Government are also worryingly slow in introducing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. UK Steel has estimated that nearly 23 million tonnes of non-EU steel could flood the UK market if the UK fails to introduce its own carbon border adjustment mechanism at the same time as the EU in 2026. When will we see the Government stepping up and investing in green steel as is being done in competitor countries, and when can we expect the introduction of a British CBAM?

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 28 Jun 2023: Tweet

  RT @AliMcDiarmid: Damning report from the CCC says the Govt has “no clear policy to decarbonise steel production” which is why hundreds of… [Source]

• 09 Jun 2023: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: “It was good to meet with Keir and discuss Labour’s plans to deliver a decarbonised steel industry at the core of an am… [Source]

• 06 Jun 2023: Tweet

  RT @Keir_Starmer: Delighted to speak at @GMB_union Congress. Workers are at the heart of our mission to decarbonise Britain’s economy. La… [Source]

• 18 May 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  The US is investing $282 billion in green manufacturing. The Spanish and German Governments are each investing £1 billion in the decarbonisation of their steel industries. Labour would match that opportunity with a £3 billion clean steel fund, but the Government’s response to date has been woefully inadequate. When will the Secretary of State bring forward a steel transition strategy that matches up with what our competitors are doing and that matches the ambition of our professional and dedicated steelworkers?

  Full debate: Topical Questions

• 23 Mar 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  I am honoured to be the chair of the all-party parliamentary group for steel and metal related industries, and I thank the Secretary of State to agreeing to come and meet us—I am very much looking forward to that discussion. However, may I raise again the issue of her Sky interview in which she said, or certainly strongly implied, that it is not a given that we should have a steel industry in this country? Given the rise of authoritarian regimes around the world, the massive role that steel plays in providing good jobs that people can raise a family on and the vital role it plays in the transition to a decarbonised economy, may I invite the Secretary of State to come to the Dispatch Box and clarify her position—that steel is, in fact, a given in the United Kingdom?

  Full debate: Energy-intensive Industries

• 21 Mar 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  The Labour party knows that every leading economy has a strong and healthy steel industry, so it is deeply concerning that of the leading economies, only Britain has a declining steel industry. It is deeply troubling that there is nothing for steel in this Budget. We know that more steel will be required in the net zero economies of the future than there is today. That creates a huge market opportunity for British steelmakers across the globe. We know that UK steel companies employ 35,000 in good, well-paid jobs well above regional pay averages, and 45,000 more in our supply chains. We know that steel underpins our defence sector and our nation’s economic resilience, in an age of turbulence where authoritarian regimes are a threat to our supply chains and our democratic values. We know that if the Government continue to sit on their hands, tens of thousands of jobs could be lost and our country’s resilience will be in tatters.

  We on the Labour Benches recognise the scale of the challenge. Steel companies in Canada, Germany and Spain are receiving up to £1 billion per plant to decarbonise, yet the British Government’s offer to our steelmakers is a fraction of that. It is therefore unsurprising that Tata Steel, owners of the biggest steelworks in the UK in my constituency, has reportedly given the Government until July to approve its investment offer, due to growing concerns that competitors in mainland Europe are getting ahead of us in the drive towards green steel. If the Government continue to dither and delay, we could see the closing down of one of the blast furnaces, which would be truly a hammer blow for our Port Talbot steelworks.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation

• 16 Mar 2023: Tweet

  RT @RachelReevesMP: I am optimistic about the future. I believe Britain has the potential to galvanise green energy and get ahead in the g… [Source]

• 2 Mar 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  Learning the lessons of the energy crisis is essential to prevent it from happening again. If our country is to better protect itself, we must become more resilient and less exposed to fluctuating global energy prices. That brings me on to a topic that the right hon. Member for Preseli Pembrokeshire (Stephen Crabb) mentioned: floating offshore wind. FLOW will be hugely important in allowing our country to stand more firmly on our own two feet. It will also be essential in helping us reach net zero.

  The second decision is on the floating offshore wind manufacturing investment scheme. FLOWMIS is another vital building block of this game changer for renewable energy. The Welsh Government have already stepped up to the mark and provided a £1 million grant to help the transformation of Port Talbot dock, with a dry dock and other facilities necessary to provide the manufacturing capability for FLOW. It is time the UK Government followed their lead and urgently launched the FLOWMIS programme. FLOWMIS co-funding would demonstrate the UK Government’s clear long-term commitment to developing the ports and the sector, giving confidence to investors and other funding providers to back the project and unlocking sizeable private sector investment potential. I really hope that the Secretary of State will say something about FLOWMIS at the Dispatch Box today.

  Full debate: Welsh Affairs

• 21 Feb 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  The Celtic freeport would sit at the heart of the emerging green ecosystem in south Wales, which is set to play a central part in providing the green, competitive and secure energy supply our country is crying out for. South Wales was the cradle of the first industrial revolution, and we can now be the cradle of the green industrial revolution. The Celtic freeport can drive forward the green technology that will power our domestic, sovereign and sustainable energy supply, drive down household energy bills, support green steel making and, of course, create up to 16,000 new local jobs. The new technology at the heart of this green manufacturing revolution will be floating offshore wind.

  The Celtic freeport bid is about prosperity, but it is also about pride. It is, of course, about prosperity for our economy and people, but it is also about pride in our country and community. We can once again lead the world in tackling the major global challenge of the 21st century, namely climate change. For our local communities, it is about taking pride in the fact that their work will contribute to that national and global mission.

  The new green ecosystem can also play a critical role in strengthening the backbone of our national economy. The covid pandemic and Putin’s barbaric invasion of Ukraine have turbocharged the need to build resilience into our supply chains. Floating offshore wind in the Celtic sea will be able to generate 24 GW of clean, green, renewable energy by 2045, which is a quarter—an enormous amount—of the UK’s total target.

  Combined with the supporting infrastructure, heavy engineering, industrial clusters and skills base along the M4 corridor, as well as the immense connectivity we have along the M4 corridor, our bid has what it takes to be a genuine game changer for our economy and security and in the battle against climate change. The prize is clear: the creation of a new long-term industry, where high-value manufacturing has “Made in Wales” firmly embossed on the tin.

  Our ports are playing their part too. Associated British Ports and the Port of Milford Haven have committed to invest £710 million in their green energy-focused ports, while the first phase of construction at Pembroke Dock is already under way, as I am sure the right hon. Member for Preseli Pembrokeshire will illustrate in his remarks. That port infrastructure will act as a launch pad to help leverage a further £700 million of investment in factories to build the massive renewable sub-structures and turbines.

  The decision about the selection of the Celtic freeport is the next vital step to secure this industry for Wales. It will provide the signal to global markets that will be needed if we want to lever in the high-impact private sector investment we need to take us forward. I will continue to make the case, and I hope that local businesses and residents across the Celtic freeport area and beyond will join me in making it. At the stroke of a pen, British and Welsh Ministers can unlock this new industry and repurpose our strengths for a green future. I hope that the UK and Welsh Governments will seize this opportunity. Wales was at the forefront of the first industrial revolution. With the right investment, commitment and decisions, we can put ourselves at the forefront of the net zero revolution.

  Full debate: Freeports: Wales

• 16 Feb 2023: Tweet

  I'm delighted to join Commission for Carbon Competitiveness. For me this is about making sure Britain's decarbonising steel industry is competitive and NOT undercut by high-carbon alternatives overseas. Decarbonisation can't mean deindustrialisation. https://www.politicshome.com/thehouse/article/competitive-decarbonisation-way-save-industrial-communities?s=09 [Source]

• 15 Feb 2023: Tweet

  RT @TheHouseMag: "Decarbonisation must not lead to deindustrialisation and the mass offshoring of well-paid jobs." ✍️ @JohnPenroseNews, @j… [Source]

• 04 Feb 2023: Tweet

  The prize-winning, globally renowned Specific project at @SwanseaUni is a truly inspiring example of net zero innovation. It’s still EU-funded, but the money is running out & there’s no guarantee it’ll get any Shared Prosperity Fund money. Vital @Info_Specific is sustained! https://twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1621021517499846662 [Source]

• 30 Jan 2023: Tweet

  RT @ABP_WSSP: A Celtic Freeport will deliver an accelerated pathway for Wales’ #netzero economy, is expected to generate over 16,000 new jo… [Source]

• 24 Jan 2023: Tweet

  The UK Govt's offer to support @TataSteelUK's decarbonisation is a step in the direction, but more must be done to match the ambition of other European govts if we are to keep our steel industry competitive. #WeNeedOurSteel for good jobs, our security, & the green transition. https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1617862251536592899/video/1 [Source]

• 04 Jan 2023: Tweet

  "The UK has two ways to decarbonise. The government could help transform British industry into sustainable world leaders. Or it could allow factories to shut and import goods [and more carbon] from abroad." - Henrik Adams, @TataSteelUK #WeNeedOurSteel https://www.thetimes.com/uk/article/britains-steel-industry-is-at-a-crossroads-but-it-can-still-be-saved-pshh5ds6d [Source]

• 15 Nov 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  This collapse in our productivity is not an act of God but the result of fundamental political choices. Do we starve businesses of the policy framework and investment they need to get our economy growing while cutting public services to the bone? Or do we pursue smart investment in Britain’s infrastructure, education, skills, research and development, and new technologies such as green energy? The Conservatives have consistently made the former choice over the past 12 years, but what we need for the decade ahead is the latter investment-driven growth model and, more specifically, Labour’s new industrial strategy.

  There is a direct link between Britain’s low growth and poor productivity and the decline of our manufacturing sector, which has collapsed from around 30% of GDP in the 1970s to just 9% today. Manufacturing provides good jobs in less prosperous areas—meaningful, well-paid jobs on which people can raise a family—as well as the industries we need to get us to net zero and, perhaps most crucially of all, the foundations of our national security and economic resilience.

  This September, manufacturing output fell by 2.3% to record the worst performance in manufacturing over three months since the 1980s. That is why the Labour party’s green prosperity plan will marry the quest for sustainable growth and jobs on which people can raise a family with the need for resilience. We see net zero not as a hindrance but as an opportunity for growth and prosperity.

  Businesspeople across the length and breadth of the country know that Labour will partner with the private sector to drive a new kind of growth that will rebalance the economy, decarbonise our industries and reignite Britain’s potential. Twelve years of the Conservatives have hammered our manufacturing sector and crashed our economy. We need change and we need it now.

  Full debate: Britain’s Industrial Future

• 19 Oct 2022: Vote

  Ban on Fracking for Shale Gas Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 18 Oct 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  The future of our country is in our air, sea and skies, and mother nature has truly given us a gift in Wales. We were the cradle of the first industrial revolution, and now Wales can be the cradle of the green industrial revolution, with Port Talbot at the forefront. Investing in Port Talbot as the hub for this game-changing form of renewable energy would turn south Wales into a green power superpower in the generation of renewable energy. I therefore urge the UK Government and all other key stakeholders to come together to ensure we grasp this opportunity with both hands.

  Full debate: Floating Offshore Wind Projects

• 06 Oct 2022: Tweet

  RT @bbcquestiontime: “There are a million jobs on the road to net zero and we should be investing to bring them here” Labour’s @lisanandy… [Source]

• 22 Sep 2022: Tweet

  RT @WelshLabour: We won't solve the climate crisis by relying on more fossil fuels. That's something our Welsh Labour Government understan… [Source]

• 22 Jul 2022: Tweet

  No steel industry can decarbonise without govt support, so why have Sunak, Truss & rest of Tory cabinet been dragging their feet? Do they think we shld stop making steel & import from China? This wld ⬆️ emissions, offshore jobs & weaken national security! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-62262290 [Source]

• 5 Jul 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  Hard-pressed households and businesses need support in these profoundly challenging times. Labour has a plan to tackle the cost of living crisis. We would cancel the national insurance contributions rise, which comes at the worst possible time and will do nothing to fix the Tory’s social care crisis. We would cut VAT on home energy bills. We would cut the red tape that has been created by the Prime Minister’s botched Brexit and we would implement policies to buy, make and sell more in Britain, particularly through commitments such as the £3 billion green steel fund to support our steel industry as it transitions to net zero.

  Full debate: Support for the Welsh Economy and Funding for the Devolved Institutions

• 27 Jun 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend is making an excellent speech, and, obviously, speaks on the basis of great experience internationally. I presume that he is about to refer to the events in Ukraine. Does he agree that not only is the Ukraine war a very pressing issue on which we need to co-operate fully, but there are many other international crises with which we are currently dealing as a country—including the climate emergency—and that it is therefore vital for us to work in partnership with our colleagues?

  From trade to diplomacy, from defeating Putin’s barbarism to tackling the climate emergency, and from scientific co-operation to responding to the rise of an increasingly authoritarian China, our democratic partners and allies across the channel should always be at the heart of our foreign policy. However, instead of recognising that basic reality, Ministers are stuck in what my right hon. Friend the Member for Tottenham (Mr Lammy), the shadow Foreign Secretary, has called

  Full debate: Northern Ireland Protocol Bill

• 01 Jun 2022: Tweet

  Governments across Europe are partnering with their steel industries to decarbonise - there are 23 hydrogen-based steel projects underway, as opposed to 0 here. Why is this?! Labour would invest £3bn to support the transition, but the UK Tory govt’s progress is painfully slow. https://twitter.com/MirrorPolitics/status/1531776285839695873 [Source]

• 11 Jan 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  As the party of growth and enterprise, Labour will help British business to weather this crisis and bounce back stronger than ever. As a passionately pro-business and pro-worker party, we recognise that private enterprise is the lifeblood of the British economy, which is why we would help to create 100,000 new businesses over five years and boost the start-up loans scheme. In our commitment to boosting productivity and growing the economy, we recognise the critical role of British manufacturing and the foundational industries that underpin it, such as steel. That is why Labour’s plan to make, buy and sell more in Britain will not only get our economy firing on all cylinders, but build our sovereign capability and help to achieve our net zero targets.

  Full debate: Reducing Costs for Businesses

• 03 Jan 2022: Tweet

  "There are huge challenges on the horizon. Climate change is already threatening jobs in energy-intensive industries such as steel and manufacturing. The longer we put off getting to net zero, the more jobs will be put at risk." ???? @FrancesOGrady https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jan/02/omicron-uk-government-should-join-us-to-create-a-fair-and-resilient-economy [Source]

• 13 Dec 2021: Vote

  Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 07 Dec 2021: Tweet

  To 'level up', boost Britain's resilience, & transition to net zero, we *need* a manufacturing renaissance - backed by strong steel industry. UK Govt *must* get our steelmakers exemptions from US tariffs - & level playing field with European competitors. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/fc1219d8-56b5-11ec-81f2-17f963b74220?shareToken=1a662032f4c7785c443ba93e495d787a [Source]

• 07 Dec 2021: Tweet

  NEW @UKSteel__ report shows electricity cost challenges. As I say in the Mirror, a Net Zero economy will need just as much steel. Either we keep good, well paid jobs in UK, or we simply offshore both jobs and carbon emissions abroad. #WeNeedOurSteel https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/steel-firms-hopes-cutting-carbon-25630830 [Source]

• 24 Nov 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Tata Steel is the largest private sector employer in my constituency, and the company is absolutely determined that there should be a future for UK steelmaking, while also recognising the importance of decarbonisation. It recognises that for UK steelmaking to enjoy a prosperous future, the industry needs support and partnership from the UK Government, first by working with the industry to manage a pathway to net zero on both public and private investment, but also by the Government levelling the playing field in order to ensure that the industry is competitive against its European counterparts.

  Full debate: Energy-intensive Industries

• 08 Nov 2021: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: NEW ???? | At #COP26 today, we launched ‘Preparing for a Just Transition: Meeting green skill needs for a sustainable stee… [Source]

• 04 Nov 2021: Tweet

  With #COP26 underway, I spoke to #SharpEnd about the importance of our Steel Industry in the transition to net-zero. Steel needs investment to support innovation and the exploration of technologies to decarbonise. @UKLabour is calling on UK govt to launch a Steel Renewal Fund. https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1456273635124002819/video/1 [Source]

• 02 Nov 2021: Tweet

  RT @UKSteel__: The #COP26 Breakthrough Agenda contained welcome ambitions for the steel sector. The world cannot decarbonise without stee… [Source]

• 28 Oct 2021: Tweet

  RT @SKinnock: UK economy will need *more* steel to transition to net zero, but sky-high electricity prices are holding us back. Yet there… [Source]

• 27 Oct 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Q6. A thriving steel industry is the foundation of a more productive and resilient Britain, yet bickering between the Chancellor and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy is blocking the chance to tackle the sky-high energy prices that our steelmakers have been facing since long before the current price spikes. With the pathway to net zero being dependent on steel firms using more electricity, not less, will the Prime Minister urge his colleagues around the Cabinet table to put in place a wholesale energy price cap, along with long overdue reductions in network connection costs? COP will not work without a cap. ( 903887 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 27 Oct 2021: Tweet

  RT @SwanseaUni: New £20 million Port Talbot facility will help Welsh industry move to #NetZero. Led by @NPTCouncil and @SwanseaUni, part… [Source]

• 27 Oct 2021: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Another Budget from the Chancellor which failed on both the cost of living crisis and the climate crisis. No green recov… [Source]

• 27 Oct 2021: Tweet

  UK economy will need *more* steel to transition to net zero, but sky-high electricity prices are holding us back. Yet there was no help offered by PM when I asked him in #PMQs, nor by Chancellor in his #Budget. Dreadful. COP won't work without an energy cap. #WeNeedOurSteel https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1453367523945091075/video/1 [Source]

• 20 Oct 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  AUKUS is not about provoking China, but about deepening co-operation between like-minded allies who share a commitment to each other’s security and a vision of a peaceful and open Indo-Pacific region. After the Government’s failed “golden era” approach, the UK must now ensure that the new arrangement increases rather than decreases our ability to influence China. The Labour party will take a strong, clear-eyed and consistent approach, seeking to co-operate with China where we can on issues such as climate change and global health, while standing firm in defence of human rights, freedom and security. On security, we believe that AUKUS in tandem with NATO can play an important role in rebalancing a relationship that, under consecutive Conservative Governments, became far too weighted in favour of Beijing, to the detriment of the British people.

  Full debate: AUKUS: Impact on Anglo-Chinese Relations

• 13 Oct 2021: Tweet

  RT @TataSteelEurope: #FunFact steel is the primary material used to deliver renewable energy such as hydro, wind and solar power ☀️???? #Susta… [Source]

• 28 Sep 2021: Tweet

  Great #lab21 panel w/ @CommunityUnion on the importance of a just transition to make our steel industry fit for the 21st century. @UKLabour are committed & our Future Steel Fund shows we’ll do what it takes to green our steel production & protect our steelworkers. #WeNeedOurSteel https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1442880669475029003/photo/1 [Source]

• 26 Sep 2021: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: “You cannot underestimate the pride we have in Port Talbot for our steel industry” @SKinnock at our just transition eve… [Source]

• 26 Sep 2021: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: We're at Labour Party conference today with an event on a just transition. Join us and speakers: @SeemaMalhotra1 @SKi… [Source]

• 25 Sep 2021: Tweet

  RT @MirrorPolitics: More steel needed to boost net-zero emissions climate change bid, says industry https://t.co/me0zHbyPbv [Source]

• 21 Sep 2021: Tweet

  RT @CommPolitics: Just Transition: A Steelworkers Union answer to climate change Hear from: @SeemaMalhotra1 @SKinnock Roz Bulleid of @Gree… [Source]

• 9 Sep 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Jo was an internationalist to her fingertips, believing that we can do more good by working together with our friends and neighbours than we could ever do on our own. She wanted Britain to continue to be an open, tolerant and generous country—a country that engages with the world with its head held high, instead of turning its back on it. She wanted Britain to face the big challenges of the 21st century—from climate change and terrorism to the stresses and strains of globalisation and the impact that they have on our communities—with our eyes and our hearts open, and with the strength in numbers that comes from standing shoulder to shoulder with our democratic allies in Europe and beyond.

  Jo worked tirelessly across party lines because she understood that, in our complex and inter-dependent world, compromise is a sign of strength, not of weakness. Jo was a pragmatic idealist in every sense of the term and I hope that we can honour Jo’s legacy by seizing every chance that we get to discard narrow party politics in favour of doing the right thing for the communities that we represent. I feel that a great way to honour that pragmatism would be for all parts of this House to make more effort to work together to meet some of the major challenges facing our country today—from climate change to social care.

  Full debate: Legacy of Jo Cox

• 06 Sep 2021: Tweet

  RT @CommunityUnion: "If we get it right, it's about making more steel not less." - Gareth Stace from @UKSteel__ on a Just Transition #Brita… [Source]

• 10 Aug 2021: Tweet

  RT @Lab_Renaissance: ????Labour rightly recognises the urgency in which we must pursue net zero targets, yet Labour’s alternative to the Tory… [Source]

• 21 Jul 2021: Tweet

  RT @SKinnock: Britain, #WeNeedOurSteel - for defence, economic security, good jobs, & net zero. My letter to @KwasiKwarteng on why UK govt… [Source]

• 20 Jul 2021: Tweet

  As I say in here, UK Govt must commit to a sector deal for steel, with decarbonisation & a just transition for workers at its heart, plus action on sky-high industrial energy prices. A vague "potential" consultation needs to quickly become a Sector Deal. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ministers-planning-steel-deal-help-24579348.amp?__twitter_impression=true [Source]

• 20 Jul 2021: Tweet

  Britain, #WeNeedOurSteel - for defence, economic security, good jobs, & net zero. My letter to @KwasiKwarteng on why UK govt needs a strategy for decarbonisation & a just transition for workers - plus action to tackle uncompetitive energy prices - to support UK steelmakers: https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1417437343938760718/photo/1 https://twitter.com/SKinnock/status/1417422982063050753 [Source]

• 30 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  The Labour party is deeply concerned about the Indian police’s incarceration of British citizen Jagtar Singh Johal, who has been held without trial for more than three and a half years. Although the Labour party does not involve itself in the internal matters of other countries, we will always stand up for human rights, democracy and international law everywhere, and we will always stand up for British citizens wherever we feel that their rights and freedoms are being violated. We value our country’s long-standing relationship with India, which we see as an important partner in the decades ahead on trade, security, climate change and, critically, the joint promotion of democracy, human rights and upholding international law. However, a strong relationship is worth having only if it means that each Government are able to engage frankly with the other and to challenge each other and take robust positions wherever necessary.

  Full debate: Detention of Jagtar Singh Johal

• 21 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Every military vehicle, major infrastructure project and power station requires steel. Steel enables us to stand on our own two feet as a nation. Homegrown steel is the only route to tackling climate change, and it will play a critical role in greening our economy, from electric cars to solar, wind and tidal power. British production processes have half the carbon footprint of China’s far less decarbonised steel industry, and shipping steel from the other side of the world is obviously more carbon intensive.

  Full debate: Protecting Britain’s Steel Industry

• 15 Jun 2021: Tweet

  Today I chaired Steel APPG panel of experts exploring how best to decarbonise without deindustrialising. Real worries that UK is falling behind the EU and China on policy development and investment. Change is coming. UK govt urgently needs to show leadership. #WeNeedOurSteel https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1404815517366501382/photo/1 [Source]

• 14 Jun 2021: Tweet

  RT @SKinnock: NEW: Join us for a digital roundtable on decarbonising the steel industry and a just transition for steelworkers. Hear from… [Source]

• 13 Jun 2021: Tweet

  NEW: Join us for a digital roundtable on decarbonising the steel industry and a just transition for steelworkers. Hear from experts @MrChrisMcDonald @MPI_UK, @rgysis12 @SWIC_Wales, Luke Warren @The_CCSA, @rozbulleid, @Jude_KD, @AliMcDiarmid. Contact jmorris@makeuk.org for link https://x.com/SKinnock/status/1404014364189941766/photo/1 [Source]

• 9 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Today, our country stands at a fork in the road, and the choice is clear. Are we going to continue to allow our manufacturing sector to wither away, constantly eroded by the sort of policies that have come to define the last decade and which are advocated in the book of the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, “Britannia Unchained”: “Let the market rip. Let the City of London call the shots. Let globalisation and deindustrialisation ride roughshod over our communities.”? Or are we going to truly understand the pandemic as a clear and unambiguous warning that we cannot go back to business as usual and that we must strive for real enduring change; that we must stand on our own two feet by reducing our dangerous over-reliance on imports from China; that it is time to recognise that the collapse of British manufacturing is the primary cause of the grotesque inequality that exists between the wealthiest and the poorest regions of our country; and that a modern manufacturing renaissance is our only route towards a fair and just transition to a cleaner, greener future?

  Home-grown steel is also the only route to tackling climate change. Steel will play a critical role in greening our economy by building the electric cars of the future and providing vital components for solar, wind and tidal power. Moreover, British production processes have half the carbon footprint of China’s far less decarbonised steel industry, and shipping steel from the other side of the world is obviously more carbon intensive.

  Secondly, the Government must as a matter of urgency address the issue of our industrial energy crisis. British steelmakers pay 86% more than their German competitors and 62% more than the French. Over the past five years, that disparity has cost the UK steel industry an additional £254 million. Those additional costs represent funds that should and would have been directed towards critical capital investment, including decarbonisation projects. Will the Minister please assure us today that her Department is truly committed to tackling the root causes of the UK’s astronomical industrial energy prices, and can she set out her urgent action plan for doing so?

  Full debate: UK Steel Sector: Supply Chains

• 07 Jun 2021: Vote

  Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 26 May 2021: Vote

  Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 19 May 2021: Tweet

  From skills to productivity to de-carbonisation, the Industrial Strategy Council was playing a vital role in supporting our manufacturing sector. But the UK govt has shut it down ????‍♂️ Short-sighted, self-defeating, & putting ideology ahead of delivery @Roy_Rickhuss @CommunityUnion https://twitter.com/CommunityUnion/status/1394707088866152451 [Source]

• 13 May 2021: Tweet

  RT @RachelReevesMP: Creating good jobs in all parts of our country, tackling the climate emergency, making sure all of our town centres are… [Source]

• 12 May 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  I therefore suggest that there should be three core principles at the heart of the Government’s response: first, dignity at work with new legislation protecting the rights of employees, not least to outlaw fire and rehire; secondly, partnering with business and trade unions for a new kind of growth to deliver the jobs of the future, recognising where Britain can be competitive but also that the less celebrated foundational industries such as steel are critical for our security; and thirdly, a properly resourced programme of training and retraining aimed at the jobs of the future. There is no point in trying to address the productivity crisis if we keep cutting the workforce out of the conversation; there is no point in investing in further education if the jobs are not there; and there is no point in decarbonising our industrial base if the local workforce is not trained up and if jobs and carbon emissions are simply offshored. As my hon. Friend the Member for Leeds West (Rachel Reeves), the shadow Chancellor, has so rightly said, our communities do not need sloganeering about levelling up; they need good jobs. She said:

  Full debate: Better Jobs and a Fair Deal at Work

• 27 Apr 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Steel is central in terms of good jobs, national security and combating climate change. There can be no post-pandemic economic recovery without a strong and healthy steel industry. Will the Chancellor therefore commit today to recognising the pivotal strategic importance of the steel industry by using the power of the Treasury to reduce the exorbitant electricity prices faced by our steelmakers—currently 82% higher than in Germany—so that our steel industry can compete on a level playing field?

  Full debate: UK Steel: Government Infrastructure Projects

• 19 Apr 2021: Tweet

  RT @AliMcDiarmid: Excellent from @SKinnock & Miriam Cates. UK steel demand is rising & net zero is a chance to grow our industry. We import… [Source]

• 19 Apr 2021: Tweet

  RT @IPPRNorth: We can't have a strong net zero economy without a strong low-carbon steel sector. As Miriam Cates and @SKinnock highlight, o… [Source]

• 18 Apr 2021: Tweet

  #WeNeedOurSteel. The challenge for the govt and steel companies is to de-carbonise without de-industrialising. That means a Just Transition to net zero based on serious public-private investment in green tech + workforce training. My comments to S.Times: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/the-last-thing-the-ailing-steel-industry-needs-a-big-bill-for-going-green-6rd7fkrqx [Source]

• 25 Mar 2021: Tweet

  RT @TanDhesi: Domestic steel production is crucial for national security, to tackle climate crisis and build our infrastructure. Yet repea… [Source]

• 23 Mar 2021: Tweet

  RT @SKinnock: "Backing our steel sector to decarbonise is a test of the @GOVUK commitment to British industry, to the green industrial revo… [Source]

• 19 Mar 2021: Tweet

  RT @GreenAllianceUK: Is China a strategic competitor or a vital ally in addressing climate change?" asks @SamAlvis2 Monday at 12pm, join… [Source]

• 19 Mar 2021: Tweet

  "Backing our steel sector to decarbonise is a test of the @GOVUK commitment to British industry, to the green industrial revolution, and to supporting industrial towns and communities." @Roy_Rickhuss of @CommunityUnion on the new Syndex and @MPI_UK report https://community-tu.org/uk-steel-industry-could-expand-in-transition-to-zero-carbon-future-report-reveals/?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com#861aa683 [Source]

• 8 Mar 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  The UK Government naturally and rightly value their trade relationship with India, which stands at more than £18 billion annually, but the UK-India relationship must be broader and deeper than just trade. It should be based on working in partnership on issues of security and climate change. Critically, it must be about the joint promotion of democracy, human rights and upholding international law.

  Full debate: Press Freedom and Safety of Protesters: India

• 21 Feb 2021: Tweet

  RT @AliMcDiarmid: Essential steel reading from @SKinnock. Steel is more important than ever & vital to a green future. Decarbonisation cann… [Source]

• 04 Feb 2021: Tweet

  This @CommunityUnion @ProspectUnion report shows why we need a just transition to net zero, where workers & families are supported with new skills & jobs. And beware carbon offshoring - whereby we simply move emissions (& jobs) overseas. Increasing imports = increasing emissions https://twitter.com/MirrorPolitics/status/1356879865006481413 [Source]

• 13 Jan 2021: Vote

  Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 16 Nov 2020: Vote

  Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 4 Nov 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  A focus on steel would deliver three interlinked benefits. First, it would support the creation of high-skilled, well-paid jobs in areas of the UK that have been ignored by successive Conservative Governments since 2010, including in south Wales. Secondly, it would strengthen the UK’s sovereign capability. One of the most important lessons of the pandemic is that we are far too dependent on supply chains from other countries, and increasingly, those countries are run by authoritarian Governments who are not our natural allies. Thirdly, it will enable our transition to net zero, backing the industries of the future but also greening current industries. Yet, by failing to provide the UK’s largest steelmaker and the employer of 4,000 steelworkers in my constituency with the emergency loans during the pandemic to plug the cash flow gap caused by the fall in demand, the Government have again chosen to sit on their hands. There can be no post-pandemic recovery, no levelling up and no modern manufacturing renaissance without a strong and healthy steel industry.

  Full debate: Public Health

• 12 Oct 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  Against that backdrop, we call on the UK Government to commit to a fundamental strategic reset in Sino-British relations. We must seek constructive engagement based on mutual respect, but respect is a two-way street. The leadership of the Communist party of China respects strength and unity, and it is contemptuous of weakness and division. We must find ways to co-operate with the Chinese Government on crucial global issues such as climate change and pandemics, while also challenging them when they undermine international law.

  Full debate: China’s Policy on its Uyghur Population

• 12 Oct 2020: Vote

  Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 29 Sep 2020: Vote

  United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 3 Jun 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  What we need, coming off the back of this crisis, is nothing short of a manufacturing renaissance in our country. If we are to grow the economy to meet the challenges presented by climate change, by the social care crisis and by the need to rebuild our economy post-pandemic in a serious, sustainable and balanced manner, we must significantly boost our manufacturing sector. It is currently languishing at 9% of GDP. I would strongly recommend that the Government set an ambitious target of boosting manufacturing to 15% of GDP by the end of this Parliament. We know that the Government like to chase targets. Let us have a target that can actually pull our economy together and rebuild it on the basis of a manufacturing renaissance.

  Full debate: Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill

• 10 Mar 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend is absolutely right; it is completely absurd to have a Government who on the one hand are committed to decarbonising our economy, but who on the other hand are failing to support Orb, which could play a major role in electric vehicles, which play a major role in decarbonising our economy. It seems that the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.

  Full debate: British Steel Industry

• 27 Feb 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  We have always been tough and resilient in Wales, but we are experiencing more and more extreme weather, and such events bring into sharper focus the need to do more to address the climate and environmental crisis that we face. Out of every crisis should come an opportunity—an opportunity for Britain to lead the world in renewable energies. The Swansea bay tidal lagoon would have provided heat to thousands of homes, using clean, green, reliable and sustainable energy, and saving almost 0.25 million tonnes of carbon during each year of its operation. If the Government are serious about tackling climate change, they should reconsider that opportunity and back that game changer for the industry. What an opportunity to “level up” the country, as the Prime Minister likes to put it, by putting the Swansea bay area at the forefront of that clean, green, energy technology.

  Full debate: Welsh Affairs

• 05 Feb 2020: Vote

  Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 7 May 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  The gap in GDP between Wales and London makes the UK the most unbalanced EU member state in terms of regional economic disparities—a truly shocking statistic that shows the size of the challenge we face if we are to reduce inequality and spread opportunity. In Aberavon, we have had absolutely no regional development support from Westminster. The Swansea bay tidal lagoon would have put south Wales at the forefront of a 21st-century industry, marrying our desperate need to produce more green energy with the creation of genuinely high-quality jobs across the region.

  Full debate: Wales: Regional Development Funding

• 2 Mar 2017: Parliamentary Speech

  A thriving steel industry must also be a catalyst for the regeneration and development that will happen if the Government get on and approve a city deal for the Swansea Bay area. That will help to regenerate and manage the impact of de-industrialisation. It also makes sense for the Government to give the green light to the Swansea Bay tidal lagoon, an idea whose time has clearly come. The lagoon would create and sustain thousands of jobs and meet 11% of Welsh energy needs with a clean, green, reliable source of sustainable energy.

  Full debate: Welsh Affairs

• 6 Dec 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  My constituency of Aberavon, along with that of my hon. Friend the Member for Swansea East (Carolyn Harris), a neighbouring constituency, would be the home of the Swansea bay tidal lagoon project, which would be the first such project in the world. Tidal lagoon power is an idea whose time has come. The Swansea bay tidal lagoon would produce enough energy to power 150,000 Welsh homes for 120 years, meeting 11% of Welsh energy needs with clean, green, reliable and sustainable energy, saving almost a quarter of a million tonnes of carbon during each year of operations. It would directly sustain over 2,000 construction and manufacturing jobs in Wales, and support as many as 311 UK industrial and manufacturing businesses along the supply chain. Crucially for my Aberavon constituency, the project will require more than 100,000 tonnes of steel, much of which will come through the Port Talbot steelworks. Tidal Lagoon Power has committed to procuring as much steel as possible from UK suppliers and it should be commended for making that pledge and held to it.

  Full debate: Tidal Lagoons and UK Energy Strategy

• 8 Sep 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  The subject of today’s debate was the subject of this year’s Davos meeting: the fourth industrial revolution, an industrial revolution that will be characterised by new forms of renewable energy and the exponential outward expansion of technological innovations, driven by the internet. It is a revolution that will take place as we face severe challenges to our economic future: seemingly ever-increasing inequality; the worst productivity crisis and trade deficit in our country’s history; greatly reduced job security; over-concentration on London as the predominant source of wealth and growth, at the expense of other regions; and over-reliance on the services industries, with manufacturing accounting for an unprecedentedly low share of GDP. Manufacturing is crucial to broadly shared wealth, but we have seen manufacturing as a share of GDP drop from over 30% 40 years ago to under 10% now. That lies at the heart of many of the difficulties—the unbalanced nature of the British economy.

  Full debate: Fourth Industrial Revolution

• 06 Sep 2016: Vote

  Finance Bill — VAT on Installation of Energy Saving Materials - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 13 Jul 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  At the Steel Council on 8 June, the Secretary of State was receptive to the industry proposals, with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and the Department of Energy and Climate Change pledging to come back with “urgency” on energy costs. Well, we are still waiting. Will the Minister do all she can, in whatever time she has left in her post, to expedite the process? What the industry cannot take is more delay and uncertainty. Steel is a foundation industry, critical to the houses in which we live, the offices in which we work, the cars we drive and the bridges we cross. It is the beating heart of economies and communities such as the one that I represent. That is why we need a resilient steel industry that can compete on a level playing field with our global competitors and that serves our entire economy and our communities. The referendum has compounded the existing uncertainties facing our industry, but that means the Government must act decisively and quickly. Brexit is a fact. The will of the British people must be enacted. If the Government act with purpose, we can make sure they work for the steel industry and for our communities.

  Full debate: EU Referendum: UK Steel Industry

• 11 May 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  The Government now have the opportunity to ensure that they do not make the same mistake twice. I have some simple questions. The first is on energy costs. The compensation package is of course welcome, but much more can be done. At Port Talbot, large amounts of gas, particularly from the coke ovens, are recycled and used as energy. It is, by definition, a form of renewable energy. Why, therefore, can we not receive renewables obligation certificates for it?

  Full debate: Steel Industry

• 03 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Neighbourhood right of appeal - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 14 Mar 2016: Vote

  Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 8 — Decarbonisation target range - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Mar 2016: Vote

  Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 3 — Carbon capture and storage strategy for the energy industry - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 8 Mar 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  I believe that the tidal lagoon should be approved for the following reasons. First, it offers Wales, and the Swansea bay region in particular, an unrivalled opportunity to place itself at the forefront of what this year’s World Economic Forum in Davos called the “fourth industrial revolution”—an industrial revolution that will be characterised by new forms of renewable energy and by the exponential outward expansion of technological innovation. We can be at the vanguard of that revolution, and the Swansea bay tidal lagoon could be a catalyst for it.

  This is a chance to harness the natural environment and the unique nature of Swansea bay to our advantage. It is an opportunity to use the environment to protect the environment, power the local community and local homes and to save money—because, secondly, the tidal lagoon will help not only to tackle climate change, but to save money in the long run. The lagoon requires a strike price of £96 per MWh. That is 16% below the cost of any offshore wind farm ever granted a contract.

  Over the project’s lifespan, it will deliver cheaper-than-wholesale electricity. The combination of the Swansea and Cardiff tidal lagoon projects, the first two of their kind in the world, would, over the course of their lifetimes, deliver the cheapest form of electrical generation on the UK grid. Thirdly, the project will create thousands of highly skilled, well paid jobs locally, supporting hundreds of local businesses. Indeed, it is already having a positive impact in the local area, as my hon. Friend the Member for Swansea East mentioned, giving rise to plans for many small businesses in the city bay region and feeding into the strategy for the Swansea bay city deal. This is exactly the kind of project that must go ahead if we are to see the rebalancing of the economy that this Government are so keen to talk about, but are apparently not always so keen to act upon. Well, here is the chance: approve the tidal lagoon and create jobs; support small business in the area; help to rebalance the economy and produce green energy.

  Full debate: Swansea Tidal Lagoon

• 3 Mar 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  The Government’s short-sightedness is undermining other forms of renewable energy, such as wind and solar. These are burgeoning industries in my constituency, with hundreds of jobs at stake, but they are under threat because of the Government’s moves to cut price stabilisation mechanisms, such as the feed-in tariffs. The Government have been on a policy descent from “Hug a huskie” to, in the words of the Prime Minister, “Let’s cut the green crap”.

  I agree absolutely. The Energy and Climate Change Committee has just produced a compelling report that clearly demonstrates that we are losing investment and jobs precisely because of the mixed messages and signals that this Government send to investors. Business abhors a vacuum. Business needs stability. It needs to know whether there will be a return on its investments, and at present it sees no evidence whatever of that in the United Kingdom.

  Full debate: Welsh Affairs

• 18 Jan 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  We saw that today in the Government’s failure to act to support the steel industry and jobs in my constituency, and we see it on climate change. Warm words will not stop global warming; only concrete action will. The connection between how we tackle climate change and how and where we get our energy is self-evident. It was for that reason that the Department of Energy and Climate Change was set up and why the Climate Change Act 2008 committed to reducing emissions by 80% by 2050. Alongside the Act was a detailed plan for moving to a low-carbon economy. Today, however, the Government are enthusiastically dismantling it, injecting as much uncertainty and instability into the energy sector as possible.

  When I worked at the World Economic Forum, I was privy to the thoughts of CEOs and leaders of some of the world’s biggest companies. I have to say that most of those people got it. They would simply tell me, “Look, our business is not sustainable if our planet is not sustainable.” It is not just the case that business and the private sector could or should be partners in sustainability; the truth is that the business community desperately wants and needs to partner government on green growth. Like me, they have seen the reports that unchecked climate change threatens at least $4.2 trillion of assets around the world. They know that a sustainable business needs a sustainable planet.

  I have seen the revolutionary capacity of private sector actors in attaining public goals—but that requires support from government. Part of that government support must be about creating an environment of certainty. Business can only mobilise and invest its intellectual and financial capital in green energy if it can have some sense of certainty—if it can be sure that the floor will not be pulled up from underneath it overnight. It is on this, and with the Bill in particular, that the Government are failing. Already the Government have decided effectively to block the solar industry from any certainty over the feed-in tariffs that it will receive once projects are finished. Now we see greater uncertainty being injected into the issue of carbon capture and storage and wind farms with the early closure of the renewable obligation.

  The hon. Gentleman mentions Germany. He is right that there are more renewables there than in the UK. It is also a fact that in Germany carbon emissions per capita are one third higher than in the UK and one third more per unit of GDP because of its reliance on coal. Does he not accept that the Government have a responsibility to decarbonise as cheaply as possible? There was a terrible announcement today in his constituency. The cost of electricity for making strip products in Port Talbot is double the price for an equivalent company in Germany. Does he not accept that part of what Government must do is mitigate that?

  On today of all days, I feel the need to talk about a specific example of where the Government’s failure to act decisively to support sustainable energy and create certainty for investors is costing our country dear: the Swansea Bay tidal lagoon. As hon. Members will be aware, Tata Steel announced over 1,000 redundancies today, with 750 of them at the Port Talbot plant in my constituency.

  It is not just on the tidal lagoon and the arbitrary scrapping of the renewables obligation that the Government are failing. The decision to axe the carbon capture and storage programme, just when Britain is on the brink of securing major investment from the private sector, puts the entire future of UK CCS at risk. CCS technology not only offers the chance of decarbonisation and of transforming non-renewable energy into something that can be made part of a viable sustainable energy mix, it supports jobs. But, again, we see a Government who are unable to create an environment of certainty for investors, employees and our country, and so our energy security is put at risk, as is the future of our planet. There can be no doubt about it: the Government’s actions are being noted around the world. The Prime Minister will parade his signature of the Paris accord, but colleagues around the world, as well as in this Chamber, see him slashing vital support for clean energy.

  The UK's reputation as a world leader on climate change is under threat, and we now face an uphill battle to meet our legally binding EU renewable energy targets. We should ask: what is the theme running through all this? It is of a Government and a party driven by the politics of now. That is why in 2005 we saw “hug a husky” and in 2010 the pledge to be the greenest Government ever; that is why we saw the ditching of the green deal when those pesky Liberal Democrats had left the Cabinet table; and it is why today we see an end to support for wind, solar and CCS. Government Members have had too many complaints at their local association meetings. Government Ministers have been too preoccupied with expensive nuclear projects and cosying up to China. The Government—or Mr Lynton Crosby—do not feel green issues and the environment are fashionable any more, and the internal politics of the Conservative party pushes them again back to their comfort ground and away from a commitment to a sustainable future.

  I implore the Government today to rethink and to go back and pay heed to those saying stop. They should stop destroying investor confidence, stop the uncertainty and start supporting a sustainable energy market and future.

  Full debate: Energy Bill [Lords]

• 26 Oct 2015: Vote

  Finance Bill (Ways and Means) (Payment of Corporation Tax) — Chapter 5 — Supplementary provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 10 Sep 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  The sustainable development goals represent a vitally important set of targets that the international community must achieve if we are to secure a future based on durable and inclusive growth. As the House knows, every one of those goals is critical, but today I want to concentrate on No. 13, which focuses on combating climate change and its impacts.

  The first point to establish is that there is no longer any reasonable doubt about the science of climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a gathering of the world’s 1,000 most eminent climate scientists, and they have made it absolutely clear that human activity is causing global warming. Indeed, as Lord Deben—formerly a Conservative Member of Parliament, and now the chairman of the UK’s Committee on Climate Change—has stated,

  Human activity is the problem, and human activity must therefore provide the solutions if we are to prevent a rise of at least 3.2° in global temperatures by 2100. The consequences of that would be all too real: the seas rising because the ice caps are melting, heat waves more frequent, and—as we have seen very close to home—flooding and extreme weather on the up. If nothing is done, we can expect more droughts and floods, affecting food security and global poverty, and hitting the poorest countries with the lowest CO 2 emissions hardest. We can expect seawater to become more acidic, affecting biodiversity and, again, food security. We can expect the sea level to rise by between 0.5 and 1.5 metres, displacing more than 100 million people and dwarfing the current tragic refugee crisis. To put it simply, if we are to have any chance of meeting the 17 sustainable development goals, we must start with a serious, actionable, large-scale plan to tackle climate change.

  Climate change is, of course, tragically topical, because all the signs point towards the refugee crisis becoming increasingly acute as conditions in the global south become worse as a result of drought and severe weather. That was put succinctly by Jamie Drummond of ONE only yesterday:

  If we are going to feed the world, as the SDGs compel us to do, we need farmers and farmland, much of which is threatened by rising sea levels, desertification and acidification due to climate change. If you own an agri-business and those farmers work for you, it will not be a case of smaller profit margins; it will be the end of your business, and the end of your livelihood and theirs. A coastal city as vast as New York or a coastal town such as Port Talbot in my constituency of Aberavon—both reliant, to differing degrees, on tourism and coastal industries—will find that its economy, and eventually its very existence, are threatened.

  I deeply regret the Government’s decisions on renewable energy subsidies, and I urge them to reconsider. However, I welcome the fact that the sustainable development goals, as a whole, are more business-oriented than the millennium goals were. There are more references to job creation and sustainable growth, both of which can be achieved if businesses and Governments invest in green technology and energy innovation. For their part, businesses must accept and embrace their responsibility to commit themselves to those measures, although many will be regulatory and could be spun by short-termists as burdensome. While aid will be necessary for some of the goals, and I would never advocate cuts in overseas development assistance, combating climate change will require large-scale investment, both public and private, first and foremost.

  The hon. Gentleman is making a very important speech. Does he agree that, if we are to achieve the sustainable development goals, it is critical for a proper and enforceable agreement to be made on climate change at the Paris summit later this year? Does he agree that that is part and parcel of the solution to the issue with which the SDGs seek to grapple?

  Supporting and enabling sustainably minded business is the key to generating significant wealth at home and abroad. With that in mind, I will finish by saying that there will necessarily be trade-offs and this will be a real test of the Government’s dedication to, and understanding of, the sustainable development goals. Climate change is a classic example of such trade-offs. In the short term fossil fuel companies are likely to perceive themselves as losers, even if the end result is a net improvement for society and the global economy in general. Effective leadership from all concerned Government Departments will be necessary, and innovative solutions will have to be found.

  I therefore urge the Government to take seriously the following five recommendations: first, to reverse the recently announced cuts to renewable energy subsidies; secondly, to invest in renewables infrastructure and the research capabilities required to engineer them; thirdly, to attach climate change conditions to overseas aid directed to infrastructure projects; fourthly, to convene a global sustainability summit to develop a road map for public-private partnerships for sustainable growth; and, fifthly, to reform the companies legislation to ensure that the articles of incorporation of any given company must include a commitment to what the World Business Council for Sustainable Development calls triple-bottom line reporting—namely people, planet, profit. This means that the performance of a company should be measured not only in terms of its short-term profitability, but also in terms of its commitment to fulfilling its societal and environmental obligations.

  Full debate: Sustainable Development Goals

• 08 Sep 2015: Vote

  Bill Presented — Devolution (London) Bill — Clause 45 — CCL: removal of exemption for electricity from renewable sources - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 14 Jul 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  This Government also need to take into consideration the importance of compensating heavy industries such as steel for the cost of the carbon tax, which eats into productivity. Going back on promises that were made in the previous Parliament would leave steel companies exposed to 70% of the cost of the EU renewable levy policies. That would be seriously detrimental to the steel sector and wider manufacturing, and ultimately harmful to the UK economy.

  Full debate: Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation