Mr. Andrew Gwynne MP: Climate Timeline

• Timeline
• Votes
• Speeches
• Tweets
• Contact

Andrew Gwynne's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Andrew Gwynne

• 29 Nov 2024: Tweet

  ???? It was fascinating to tour the facility, learn how the process of brickmaking has evolved, and to discuss how the process will evolve in the future as we move towards net zero. ????2/3 https://x.com/GwynneMP/status/1862520622229643777/photo/1 [Source]

• 29 Nov 2024: Tweet

  ????It was fascinating to tour the facility, learn how the process of brick making has evolved, and to discuss how brick making will evolve into the future as we move towards net zero. ????2/3 https://x.com/GwynneMP/status/1862510556374048847/photo/1 [Source]

• 14 Aug 2024: Tweet

  RT @MayorofGM: ???? Today Andy visited the @ADLbus factory in Falkirk building new zero-emission buses for our @BeeNetwork. Bringing buses ba… [Source]

• 15 Feb 2024: Tweet

  RT @MurtazaRIqbal: Great Burnage Climate Change Challenge Event at @Burnage_Academy with my colleagues @bevcraig & @CllrAzraAli https://t.c… [Source]

• 19 Jan 2024: Tweet

  RT @NetZeroAPPG: The Net Zero APPG and @GM__WG were delighted to visit Energy House 2.0 at @SalfordUni with @GwynneMP, @RLong_Bailey, our c… [Source]

• 16 Dec 2023: Tweet

  ???? WATCH: COP28 was an opportunity to assert our net zero leadership on the global stage, but that was undermined by the PM's language. I hope the Minister can have a word with Number 10, and stop these damaging headlines from having an impact on our international standing. https://twitter.com/GwynneMP/status/1735985286117544127/video/1 [Source]

• 08 Dec 2023: Tweet

  RT @NaylorCllr: Had a fantastic morning at the inaugural @TamesideMnsBiz Net Zero Festival. With over 50 local businesses represented it wa… [Source]

• 30 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @Matthew_Wright: ???? Sunak, Cameron and King Charles each take own private jets to travel to Cop28 https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/sunak-cameron-king-cop28-private-jets-b2455630.html [Source]

• 28 Nov 2023: Parliamentary Speech

  3. What recent discussions she has had with businesses on the Government's net zero targets. ( 900333 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  Well, as the Minister seems to meet so many business leaders, he must have heard their shock and horror about the Government’s roll-backs on net zero. Earlier this month, the Aviva chief executive officer Amanda Blanc said that the Government were putting our climate goals as a country “under threat”, putting at risk

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 23 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @CAFOD: Countries that are the most vulnerable to climate change are being held to ransom by Western private creditors. Thank you, @ly… [Source]

• 17 Nov 2023: Tweet

  ???? Thanks to @Afzal4Gorton for inviting me to his Mini-COP28 conference with @ManchesterFoE where schoolchildren from across the current Gorton constituency did some fantastic work on environmental issues from global warming, deforestation, food security, warm homes and more. ???? https://twitter.com/GwynneMP/status/1725569089018499125/photo/1 [Source]

• 17 Nov 2023: Tweet

  RT @Afzal4Gorton: Today I hosted a Mini COP28 event for primary school children. We discussed the importance of tackling the climate crisi… [Source]

• 21 Sep 2023: Tweet

  RT @LGA_Labour: So @KemiBadenoch doesn’t think local government is relevant to tackling climate change? Get in one of the seven bins ???? G… [Source]

• 31 Aug 2023: Tweet

  RT @APPGKinshipCare: Today @ClaireCoutinho has been appointed Secretary of State for Energy Security & Net Zero, leaving her role as Childr… [Source]

• 28 Jul 2023: Tweet

  RT @haveigotnews: Rishi Sunak to discuss climate goals with King Charles at Balmoral, just as soon as he can secure an Airbus A380 to get h… [Source]

• 19 Jun 2023: Tweet

  RT @Ed_Miliband: Labour's Green Prosperity Plan is about lower bills, good jobs, energy security, and climate leadership. Read about what… [Source]

• 06 Jun 2023: Tweet

  RT @Keir_Starmer: Delighted to speak at @GMB_union Congress. Workers are at the heart of our mission to decarbonise Britain’s economy. La… [Source]

• 25 May 2023: Tweet

  RT @RachelReevesMP: We must tackle climate change whilst seizing the opportunity to create jobs in future green industries in every part of… [Source]

• 07 Apr 2023: Tweet

  RT @simonlightwood: The Tories promised 4,000 zero emission buses on UK roads by the end of this Parliament. How many are actually on the… [Source]

• 19 Oct 2022: Vote

  Ban on Fracking for Shale Gas Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 20 Jun 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  In addition to massively inconveniencing residents, there are three areas where the Government’s plan to suspend the line falls short. First, we have decarbonisation and green investment. Suspending the Ashton Metrolink line will, as I said, increase congestion from buses in an already urbanised part of Greater Manchester, incentivise individuals to travel by private car rather than by zero-emission Metrolink trams, and undermine the Government’s own transport decarbonisation plan.

  Full debate: High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill

• 2 Mar 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  One of the set-backs at COP26 was the failure to reassemble the coalition we managed to put together in Paris in 2015, which met the high ambition to bring both developed and developing countries together to put pressure on the big emitters to pull weight. In the transition to a new presidency, what is the current President doing to try to rebuild that coalition ahead of Egypt taking on the role?

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 15 Dec 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  2. What recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy on supporting renewable energy generation in Scotland. ( 904685 )

  Full debate: Renewable Energy Generation

  The British Government have not backed the Acorn carbon capture and storage cluster, which is vital to Scotland’s path to net zero, but are maintaining support for the Cambo oilfield, which would dig up more fossil fuels for years to come. Does the Minister agree that the priority should always be supporting renewable energy generation, not fossil fuels?

  Full debate: Renewable Energy Generation

• 13 Dec 2021: Vote

  Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 30 Nov 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  On the skills for tomorrow, there is a huge concern about amendment 4, which removes subsection (6) on future issues around climate change and environmental goals. Surely those issues will only grow in importance. Removing that from the Bill seems incomprehensible.

  My hon. Friend has prompted me to point out that wind turbines are made in the great city of Hull, and we are going to be one of the green energy capitals of the UK. I wanted to get that in Hansard .

  On Government amendment 4, given that COP was a month ago and how disappointing it was, we must ensure that all Bills include elements that remind us of the importance of climate change, which is the issue of our time and that of decades to come. The Government are seeking to remove subsection (6), inserted by the Peers for the Planet group, which importantly sees LSIPs granted to authorities by the Secretary of State only if they comply with the duty in the Climate Change Act 2008. We must ensure that, at every opportunity, in every piece of legislation, that duty is embedded in our thinking, and future generations must know of our determination on that.

  Full debate: Skills and Post-16 Education Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

• 23 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  My remarks are about how a UK invention made in the north-west has exciting potential to reduce carbon emissions across the world, create green energy and generate thousands of skilled jobs and apprenticeships here at home. I am referring to a cutting-edge piece of geothermal technology called the geo-engine, based in my hon. Friend’s constituency. The creators of the geo-engine have been meeting with north-west MPs to try to secure support for their technology. By supporting them in bringing this world-leading technology to market the Government could show the world that the UK’s words are matched by its actions when it comes to helping the world to meet its emissions targets. It would be a clear example on which the COP26 President, the right hon. Member for Reading West (Alok Sharma), could draw as the UK hosts the conference in November.

  “The geo-engine could help achieve the ambitious decarbonisation targets set in the North Sea Transition Deal for offshore gas published by BEIS in March.”

  Let me explain the technology and its wider applications. The environment is harmed by the process of carbon dioxide flaring, which is used to burn off natural gas in CO 2 -contaminated natural gas fields around the world. It accounts for around 300 million tonnes of CO 2 annually. That figure continues to rise as uncontaminated gas reserves dwindle. The geo-engine, however, is able to eliminate CO 2 flaring by powering carbon capture and storage and creating surplus power that can be fed into the grid as net zero energy or used to create blue or green hydrogen.

  With gas fields located around the world, there is a huge opportunity for the export and adoption of this UK technology. The UK could also benefit, so the investors believe, from the use of geo-engines in abandoned oil fields by recirculating the geothermal power sourced from hydrogen for hydrogen production. That could assist the UK significantly in its net zero energy future. The University of Liverpool and the geo-engine inventors are currently investigating that possibility further.

  Full debate: Green Energy in the North-west

• 9 Jun 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  What steps the Government are taking to promote climate action and a green recovery from the covid-19 pandemic ahead of COP26. ( 900911 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

  And that is very welcome, but building back better after covid cannot just apply to us here in the United Kingdom; there absolutely has to be a global approach. So is the President frustrated that the big emitters such as Australia, Japan, South Korea and Russia have only resubmitted their previous climate pledges, and worse, that Brazil has backtracked on its climate pledge? What is he doing to convince them that meeting their fair share is important so that we can achieve the 45% reduction in emissions to keep our climate change within 1.5° C?

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 07 Jun 2021: Vote

  Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 26 May 2021: Vote

  Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Apr 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  What steps the Government are taking to promote climate action and a green recovery from the covid-19 pandemic ahead of COP26. ( 914040 )

  Full debate: Covid-19: Green Recovery

  The COP President has talked confidently about British leadership, but the Prime Minister’s 10-point plan is full of big words and no real detail. The total impact, by the Government’s own admission, is that they will not meet the fourth and fifth carbon budgets. When we pull back the curtain, there is not much to look at, and we are running out of time. He has just said, in answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Putney (Fleur Anderson), that there will be a net zero strategy. We need it before the summer recess to make the Government’s word credible ahead of COP26. Does he agree with that, and if so, what is he doing about it?

  Full debate: Covid-19: Green Recovery

• 11 Mar 2021: Parliamentary Speech

  Last week, the Chancellor set out the support he is providing to businesses until they can reopen their doors, but although the Office for National Statistics showed that aviation was the worst-affected sector, it was not given a single mention. Does the Minister agree that the support already provided to airports will not be enough to cover them losing many times that amount each month? Is he not missing a trick here both to help the sector to survive and help it to modernise to meet our climate change obligations?

  Full debate: Aviation Industry

• 13 Jan 2021: Vote

  Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 16 Nov 2020: Vote

  Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 12 Oct 2020: Vote

  Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 29 Sep 2020: Vote

  United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 05 Feb 2020: Vote

  Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 25 Jun 2019: Vote

  Delegated Legislation — Value Added Tax - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 06 Sep 2016: Vote

  Finance Bill — VAT on Installation of Energy Saving Materials - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 09 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Planning obligations and affordable housing - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 03 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Neighbourhood right of appeal - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 26 Oct 2015: Vote

  Finance Bill (Ways and Means) (Payment of Corporation Tax) — Chapter 5 — Supplementary provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 3 Mar 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  T3. What work will the Foreign Secretary do with his international counterparts to build on the progress that was made at the United Nations climate change conference in Lima last December? What role does he think that the Commonwealth has in that regard, given the vulnerability of a number of small island states? ( 907819 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 04 Dec 2013: Vote

  Recall of Elected Representatives — Schedule 4 — Application and modification of emissions limit duty - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 04 Jun 2013: Vote

  Energy Bill — Clause 10 — Direction to offer contract - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 04 Jun 2013: Vote

  Energy Bill — Clause 1 — Decarbonisation - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 03 Jun 2013: Vote

  Communities and Local Government — Clause 42 — Duty not to exceed annual carbon dioxide emissions limit - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye

• 19 Dec 2012: Vote

  Charities Act 2011 (Amendment) — Energy Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 12 Sep 2012: Parliamentary Speech

  Q6. The Adam Werritty affair should have taught Ministers important lessons about becoming too close to their outside advisers. Now it appears that the Prime Minister’s climate change Minister, the hon. Member for Bexhill and Battle (Gregory Barker), may be making similar mistakes. Given media reports today, does the Prime Minister have the same complete confidence in his climate change Minister as he had in his former Defence Secretary? ( 120390 )

  Full debate: Oral Answers to Questions

• 11 Jun 2012: Vote

  Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Sep 2011: Vote

  Prime Minister — Clause 42 — Domestic energy efficient regulations - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Sep 2011: Vote

  Prime Minister — Clause 42 — Domestic energy efficient regulations - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Sep 2011: Vote

  Prime Minister — New Clause 1 — Energy efficiency aim - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 5 Jul 2011: Parliamentary Speech

  My hon. Friend is setting out his case very well. In recent years, there has been an ever-speedier move towards the globalisation of our economies, and he is absolutely right that this assessment and review is needed in respect of our obligations to global society. My hon. Friend has set out that case perfectly. Does he agree that it is crucial that we do not overlook some of the global challenges in tackling poverty and climate change?

  Yes, and when the various groups lobbied us last month it was interesting to note how the debate had progressed since the original discussions about the Tobin tax. The debate had become much more refined and concretely related to the global needs that my hon. Friend mentioned. There has been a debate about how we allocate these resources and what the greatest priorities are, and so far it has been about poverty in this country so that we do not in any way undermine support for such taxation among people in the UK, but we must balance that with support for efforts in the developing world. The climate change issue has also come on to the agenda since the Tobin tax was first proposed.

  Full debate: Finance (No. 3) Bill

• 10 May 2011: Parliamentary Speech

  This debate is incredibly timely, coming as it does after two reports on the Government’s commitment to making change on the scale needed to tackle the threat of climate change and the role that a shift from dependence on oil to low-carbon alternatives in motor vehicles could play in meeting that challenge. Climate change is a threat that almost everyone now recognises we must treat seriously.

  It was a surprise to read in the media that three Departments, including the Department for Transport, have raised objections to the new carbon budget proposed by the Committee on Climate Change. A leaked letter from the Business Secretary stated that accepting the carbon budget would endanger the competitiveness of British industry—that hardly says much for the Transport Secretary’s green credentials. As has been mentioned, rising fuel prices have led to a growing recognition of the need for change, not only among environmental campaigners or the political elite, but across the country. We know how the volatility of oil supplies impacts on the price at the petrol pump, causing misery for drivers and contributing to the costs facing families who are already feeling a squeeze on their incomes. The decision to increase VAT on petrol has added to the burden facing motorists, and the hon. Member for South West Bedfordshire mentioned those increasing costs in his contribution.

  The goal of cheaper, greener motoring should unite everyone, as I believe it does. The public need the possibility of cheap, reliable transport, and the Government need efficient and clean transport networks that rely on secure energy supplies. Businesses must look to remain profitable and competitive at a time when the economy is under strain and environmental concerns are ever more pressing. Transport—primarily road transport—is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and the hon. Gentleman spoke about the need to use clean energy because as much as one fifth of all emissions come from road transport.

  Full debate: Ultra Low-Carbon Emission Vehicles

• 3 May 2011: Parliamentary Speech

  The Energy and Climate Change Committee has seen evidence on the wider future of our electricity and gas network. This country wants to attract £200 billion of investment in its energy infrastructure, but if investors are being asked to build a massive offshore wind farm that will bring in more profits if the price of carbon goes the way they are betting, they will look across and see what has happened to the oil industry. They will not want the Treasury to come along and say, “Electricity bills are rising, so we’re going to put a windfall tax on the offshore wind farm,” which would undermine that investment decision. There is a read-across from gas and oil to wider investment in energy and big infrastructure projects in this country.

  Finally, I want to reinforce how crucial the mature fields are in unlocking future investment. Many of the investments being attracted today are much smaller than before, and they would not stand up if they did not tie back to one of the big platforms that still operate in the North sea. That is why I was somewhat concerned by some of the Treasury’s evidence to the Energy and Climate Change Committee. The Treasury said that petroleum revenue tax fields were now just cash-making fields, so they did not need any more investment—but the very age of those fields means that they do need investment. The Health and Safety Executive is very keen to keep a close eye on those fields: because of their age, the safety of their infrastructure is crucial. Moreover, investment could be vital in ensuring that that hub remains to unlock any smaller fields around the North sea.

  Full debate: Finance (No. 3) Bill

  The other thing that was said at the time of the Budget was that the detail would be agreed with the industry and motoring organisations. I hope that we will get a report from the Minister on what discussions and agreements have been achieved. The initial press reports of her meetings with the industry were very alarming indeed. It sounded as though the industry was furious with what had happened and that Ministers did not have a proper answer to its serious concerns. It would be nice to know whether the negotiations have developed, although it seems from what we have read even today in the newspapers and on the web that they have so far not been fruitful. It would also seem that the Government, in their headlong rush, are not taking account of the fact that further evidence has yet to be given to the Select Committee on Energy and Climate Change. Indeed, that evidence is to be given only tomorrow, yet the Government are ploughing ahead, mindless of what the industry is telling them.

  Full debate: Finance (No. 3) Bill