Ms Diane Abbott MP: Climate Timeline

• Timeline
• Votes
• Speeches
• Tweets
• Contact

Diane Abbott's Climate-related Tweets, Speeches & Votes

We've found the following climate-related tweets, speeches & votes by Diane Abbott

• 29 Jan 2024: Tweet

  The leadership must stick to the £28bn pledge. We need to move to net zero. The economy is crying out for investment and good jobs. We also need to show we have an alternative - sustainable growth. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/labour-rows-back-once-more-on-28bn-green-pledge-b25xb8mmv [Source]

• 28 Jul 2023: Tweet

  We are facing a climate crisis. People are choosing between eating and heating. And the government's response? A cosy chat with Jeremy Hunt. Shell’s ‘obscene’ $5bn profits reignite outrage amid climate crisis https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jul/27/shell-profits-oil-gas-price-shareholders?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 27 Jul 2023: Tweet

  Huge divergence between the mounting evidence of catastrophic climate change and the political will to do anything about it. 2022 was UK’s warmest year on record, says Met Office https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/27/2022-warmest-year-record-uk-met-office-extreme-heat?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 25 Jul 2023: Tweet

  This at the same time that the government is talking about 'cutting the green crap'. Fiddling while Rome burns. Deadly global heatwaves undeniably result of climate crisis, scientists show https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jul/25/deadly-global-heatwaves-undeniably-result-of-climate-crisis-scientists-attribution?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 28 Jun 2023: Tweet

  Ministers are simply paying lip service to the challenges of climate change. As a result, energy bills will be higher, job opportunities lost, investment foregone and there will be no British government contribution to tackling the climate crisis. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-66032607 [Source]

• 31 Mar 2023: Tweet

  Sunak chose to drill in response to climate change. The great 'problem solver' only ever addresses problems in his own party; planet Earth can fry. Another charlatan in Number 10. Hasty changes to Sunak’s climate strategy reveal a warring Tory party https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/mar/30/hasty-changes-to-rishi-sunak-climate-strategy-reveal-a-warring-tory-party?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 08 Dec 2022: Tweet

  Climate change? This government does not care. UK’s first new coalmine for 30 years gets go-ahead in Cumbria https://t.co/WeMrTkY7Ze [Source]

• 18 Nov 2022: Tweet

  The poorest countries will suffer the burden of climate change first and hardest. But disgracefully they are being let down by the richest countries. UN chief warns of ‘breakdown in trust’ with no deal in sight at Cop27 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/17/un-chief-warns-of-breakdown-in-trust-with-no-deal-in-sight-at-cop27?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 07 Nov 2022: Tweet

  Rishi Sunak did not want to go COP27. Tory government have not met the funding commitments they made. They are now reversing measures already agreed, with new oil and coal fields. Climate crisis: past eight years were the eight hottest ever, says UN https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/06/climate-crisis-past-eight-years-were-the-eight-hottest-ever-says-un?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 02 Nov 2022: Tweet

  RT @HackneyAbbott: These Tories don't take climate change seriously, and don't keep their word. UK criticised for failing to pay $300m in… [Source]

• 02 Nov 2022: Tweet

  So Rishi Sunak has found the time to go to COP27 after all. Maybe it was because he found out that Boris Johnson was going #COP27 https://x.com/HackneyAbbott/status/1587761355179921408/photo/1 [Source]

• 02 Nov 2022: Tweet

  These Tories don't take climate change seriously, and don't keep their word. UK criticised for failing to pay $300m in promised climate funds ahead of Cop27 https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/nov/01/uk-criticised-for-failing-to-pay-300m-in-promised-climate-funds-ahead-of-cop27?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 19 Oct 2022: Vote

  Ban on Fracking for Shale Gas Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 01 Oct 2022: Tweet

  Why won’t Liz Truss let Charles attend the Cop27 climate change summit, is it that she is a climate change denier? https://t.co/wJt40ZAYCc [Source]

• 25 Jul 2022: Tweet

  RT @HackneyAbbott: The Tories have created one crisis after another - cost of living, climate change, NHS, public services. To distract fr… [Source]

• 24 Jul 2022: Tweet

  The Tories have created one crisis after another - cost of living, climate change, NHS, public services. To distract from the effects of their own policies they are doubling down on their illegal and immoral response to refugees. A disgrace. https://www.itv.com/news/2022-07-24/truss-and-sunak-pledge-fresh-measures-to-tighten-british-borders [Source]

• 12 Jul 2022: Tweet

  A failure to tackle climate change. A failure of privatisation and under-investment in reservoirs and to prevent leaks. A Tory failure. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/environment/article/water-firms-warn-of-hosepipe-bans-as-britain-bakes-hmppch0nh [Source]

• 26 Apr 2022: Tweet

  RT @metecoban92: We have a duty to respond to the climate emergency with real solutions. Our Green New Deal for Hackney is a model for tra… [Source]

• 24 Apr 2022: Tweet

  RT @metecoban92: I’m delighted to announce @HackneyLabour’s Green New Deal - a £50 million investment to tackle the climate crisis. Our G… [Source]

• 25 Feb 2022: Parliamentary Speech

  The Minister must be wondering why housing disrepair is so endemic. There are several reasons. There is a lack of funding from the Government generally and they, quite correctly, put the responsibility for fire safety and net zero carbon emissions on to housing associations. I support those policies and that is the right thing to do, but they fail to fund those issues properly. It would take £15 billion to deal with fire safety issues in London alone.

  Full debate: Housing Disrepair

• 13 Dec 2021: Vote

  Subsidy Control Bill — Schedule 1 - The subsidy control principles - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 12 Nov 2021: Tweet

  RT @BellRibeiroAddy: Debilitating debt repayments mean many of the most climate-vulnerable countries are confronting the climate emergency… [Source]

• 09 Nov 2021: Tweet

  Cop26 will be the whitest and most privileged ever – it should be a source of great shame to everyone. My latest piece for the Independent ???????? https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/opinion/cop26-whitest-most-privileged-climate-crisis-b1953546.html [Source]

• 08 Nov 2021: Tweet

  The fact that fossil fuel industry is the biggest delegation at COP26 explains the lack of real progress https://t.co/GCgfQZLCGh [Source]

• 27 Oct 2021: Tweet

  Ahead of COP26, the Chancellor is encouraging more short haul flights. Terrible backwards step for tackling climate change. Instead of support for polluting short haul flights, the Chancellor should be investing in green alternatives #Budget21 https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/budget-air-passenger-duty-domestic-flights-b1946038.html [Source]

• 25 Oct 2021: Tweet

  RT @LeftFootFwd: .@jeremycorbyn writes on COP26 for @LeftFootFwd: "Our crises of climate, inequality, the Covid 19 pandemic and democracy a… [Source]

• 09 Aug 2021: Tweet

  RT @BellRibeiroAddy: The richest 1% are responsible for double the greenhouse gas emissions of the poorest 50%. We cannot tackle the clima… [Source]

• 11 Jun 2021: Tweet

  It's time for the #G7 to honour their promise to fund $100bn for countries on the front line of the climate crisis. Global warming means over 2bn of the world’s poorest suffer heat stress, crop failures, food & water scarcity. Climate injustice=climate chaos for all #G7PayUp [Source]

• 11 Jun 2021: Tweet

  We’re running out of time to stop catastrophic climate change. The countries least responsible are being hit the hardest. The @G7 must pay $100bn annually to countries with the least resources to fund renewable energy led development #G7PayUp [Source]

• 07 Jun 2021: Vote

  Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill — New Clause 1 - Human Rights Abuses - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 26 May 2021: Vote

  Environment Bill — New Clause 24 - Prohibition on burning of peat in upland areas - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 09 Mar 2021: Tweet

  When Meghan likes avocados, they fuel human rights abuses & climate breakdown. When Kate likes avocados, they’re just a nice snack. Why do you think that is? ???? #HarryandMeghanonOprah https://x.com/HackneyAbbott/status/1369337569247436805/video/1 [Source]

• 13 Jan 2021: Vote

  Financial Services Bill — Schedule 2 - Prudential regulation of FCA investment firms - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 16 Dec 2020: Tweet

  The ravages of climate change should be an issue for us all. They are certainly an issue hitting some of the world's poorest the hardest. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/dec/16/how-floods-are-emptying-bangladesh-villages?CMP=share_btn_tw [Source]

• 16 Nov 2020: Vote

  Pension Schemes Bill [Lords] — Clause 124 - Climate change risk - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 12 Oct 2020: Vote

  Agriculture Bill — After Clause 42 - Contribution of agriculture and associated land use to climate change targets - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 29 Sep 2020: Vote

  United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — New Clause 6 - Economic development: climate and nature emergency impact statement - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 05 Feb 2020: Vote

  Transport - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 22 Jan 2020: Parliamentary Speech

  The only factor that is radicalising people with these concerns is their legitimate and understandable worry that we are not addressing climate change quickly enough. Will the Minister respond to the question from my right hon. Friend the shadow Home Secretary about who is now leading this programme, as he did not manage to address that? Does he share my concern that the Prevent programme and anti-terrorist strategy has had its credibility damaged by this action, and that he will need to work to restore its credibility?

  The police might say that this was an error of judgment, but it is also part of a pattern. Footage of my arrest for peaceful protest against fracking was used in Prevent training sessions back in 2015. In 2016, the Home Office said that support for anti-fracking was not an indicator of vulnerability to extremism, but years later, evidence shows that four police forces were still identifying anti-fracking as a perceived extremist risk, so can the Minister tell me why we should now trust his Department on this subject? What is it doing differently? In particular, what reassurance can he give us that he will advise the police to ensure that any policing in the run-up to, and at, COP26 is within the law and appropriate?

  First, as I said earlier, the police in this country have independence, and it is important that we protect and respect that. They have said that this was an error of judgment. They have withdrawn the document and are reviewing it. The guidance documents that Counter Terrorism Policing produces are used across policing and by partners to deal with groups, including at public events in public venues. The hon. Lady refers to COP26, which is coming up soon and is a tremendous opportunity for this country to outline what we do. I have absolute confidence that our police will do as they always do at these events, which is to do our country very proud.

  Full debate: Prevent Programme

• 23 Oct 2019: Parliamentary Speech

  It is important to remember that these 39 poor, unfortunate people are the victims in this; they have been preyed on by the greedy, the unscrupulous and people with a wilful disregard for the lives of others. However, we should take account of the wider context. Nobody leaves their home on such a journey, with so much risk and fear, on a whim. They often do it because they are desperate; they can be the victims of economic privation, war, famine, catastrophic climate change. There are many adverse conditions that people flee from, but we should not lose sight of the fact that these people are victims.

  Full debate: Major Incident in Essex

• 06 Sep 2016: Vote

  Finance Bill — VAT on Installation of Energy Saving Materials - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 09 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Planning obligations and affordable housing - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 03 May 2016: Vote

  Housing and Planning Bill — Neighbourhood right of appeal - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 21 Apr 2016: Parliamentary Speech

  We know that Ministers have some excellent programmes in Somalia, but immediate help is needed, both to provide water, food and shelter and to make regions such as Somalia resilient to the increasing incidence of drought, which means more boreholes, better irrigation and better methods of storing rainwater. We saw flash floods when we left British Somaliland, but the water runs off the earth and into the rivers. Clean water is an issue, but so is an absolute lack of water. If the Minister is unable to answer now, will he write on what is being done to help the people of Somalia to deal with the incidence of drought that they are enduring now and on what is being done to help them to be resilient? With climate change, such regions of the world, which once might have seen drought every seven years or every decade, are seeing drought year after year. They need help in both the short term and the medium term to become resilient to drought.

  Full debate: Clean Water and Sanitation (Africa)

• 14 Mar 2016: Vote

  Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 8 — Decarbonisation target range - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Mar 2016: Vote

  Energy Bill [Lords] — New Clause 3 — Carbon capture and storage strategy for the energy industry - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 19 Nov 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  The Opposition welcome the Government’s increased replenishment of the International Fund for Agricultural Development. It comes at a crucial time, particularly with the financial issues facing the World Food Programme and the ever-decreasing levels of food security, which are partly due to climate change.

  We note that the Government have given generously to the fund, and they have even specifically given money in the past few years to alleviate the effects of climate change. However, getting money out of the door means nothing if steps are not taken to make this process sustainable.

  The International Fund for Agricultural Development has focused particularly on the effects of climate change on agriculture in poor rural communities. Although climate change is not the subject of this statutory instrument, Her Majesty’s Government should note that unless we reach a global deal on carbon emissions in Paris in a few weeks, many of the agricultural projects that we have funded and continue to fund will be under threat.

  In conclusion, we support the replenishment in principle. We advise the Government that we want maximum transparency and accountability on the fund’s outcomes. With the upcoming Paris climate change summit, the UN World Food Programme’s problems and, above all, the effects of climate change on global food production, the replenishment could not be more timely.

  Full debate: Draft International Fund for Agricultural Development (Tenth Replenishment) Order 2015

• 4 Nov 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  I broadly welcome the Government’s approach to the new global goals, but it is important to make the following points. We welcome the Government’s response and willingness to accept the Europe-wide policies in relation to implementing the global goals. In particular, we are glad that the Government welcomed the communication’s remarks on climate change. Given that initially they did not support the establishment of climate change as a stand-alone global goal, that represents progress. We hope that that will mean that the UK pushes with real vigour for a global deal next month at the UN climate change conference talks in Paris.

  On the question of climate change, the Opposition are concerned that the UK Government appear to have rolled back many major national climate change policies. The commitment to zero-carbon homes has been cancelled, the green deal appears to have been scrapped and the climate change levy exemption for zero-carbon energy has been removed, to name but a few.

  The only commitments that we have made leading up to the Paris talks are as part of the European position. It is good to see that Europe-wide consensus and we welcome it, but it falls short of our own Climate Change Act 2008, brought in by the previous Labour Government. The UK is going into those climate change talks saying we will deliver less than our own legislation demands. We believe that the 2008 Act sets an international standard that we must live up to. The UK should be saying that Europe is not ambitious enough, and using our influence to ensure a global deal that will impact on the lives of thousands. The Government appear to have no concrete position or plan to push for a global deal, and we are but a month away from Paris.

  Broadly, we support the Government’s approach on the communication. We want to work closely with them to move towards implementation of the global goals. However, we still want detail on what was done to deliver the millennium development goals, we think that more can be done on climate change and we are concerned about inadequate Government proposals to meet the challenge of the Europe-wide migration crisis.

  Full debate: Poverty Eradication and sustainable development

• 26 Oct 2015: Vote

  Finance Bill (Ways and Means) (Payment of Corporation Tax) — Chapter 5 — Supplementary provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 9 Jun 2015: Parliamentary Speech

  With London’s population growing year on year, our city is at a crossroads on the issue of the environment in general and air pollution in particular. Londoners must choose whether they want a change for the better. A London with cleaner air and an increased reliance on renewable energy, and that is a safe city for cyclists and pedestrians, is an achievable reality with the right political will; I contend that the current Mayor has not shown that political will. An incoming Mayor must take urgent action.

  The Mayor should consider the use of sustainable technologies. I visited a very interesting project in Hackney a week or so ago, where solar panels have been put on top of a big council block. That enables people there to get their electricity more cheaply, and it is also a sustainable energy source. It is a very interesting project, which could be potentially rolled out across London.

  Current efforts are insufficient. Not enough progress has been made on increasing the number of hybrid buses in TfL’s fleet; rectifying that deficiency should be a priority. The fact that Oxford Street remains one of the most polluted streets in the world is evidence that measures to reduce pollution from taxis and buses are not being pursued with sufficient energy. We need to establish more accessible grants for environmentally friendly infrastructure development. London can become a global leader in the proliferation of renewable energy sources, such as solar power. London would do well to adopt such good practices as the creation of last-mile delivery hubs, to ensure that the carbon footprint of final-stage delivery is minimised. There are firms in the City that encourage their employees to walk more—if not to work, then at least between offices. We need to improve London’s sustainable infrastructure; that would create jobs in construction and logistics.

  Toxic air in London is killing Londoners, and we urgently need measures to tackle it. Promises to meet EU guidelines by 2025 or even by 2030 are unacceptable, and it is shocking that it has taken direct action from the Supreme Court to force the Government and the Mayor to address this issue seriously. It is clear that we have a real opportunity to tackle air pollution through a wholesale shift in the way that we view our living environment. For London, Londoners and the wider population in the UK, it is imperative that we seize the initiative and put an end to this silent killer once and for all, and I am using this opportunity to urge all stakeholders to step up and take responsibility. Individual companies can encourage sustainable travel on the part of their employees; housing developers can encourage sustainable development that uses renewable energy; borough councils can do more to encourage cycling to school, and they can also give out information about air pollution; the Mayor of London, who I think we can agree has comprehensively failed on this issue, can do more; and so can the Government. People should not have had to go to court to force the Government to recognise their responsibilities under EU law.

  Full debate: Air Pollution (London)

• 04 Dec 2013: Vote

  Recall of Elected Representatives — Schedule 4 — Application and modification of emissions limit duty - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: No

• 04 Jun 2013: Vote

  Energy Bill — Clause 133 — Financial provisions - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 04 Jun 2013: Vote

  Energy Bill — Clause 10 — Direction to offer contract - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 04 Jun 2013: Vote

  Energy Bill — Clause 1 — Decarbonisation - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 03 Jun 2013: Vote

  Communities and Local Government — Clause 42 — Duty not to exceed annual carbon dioxide emissions limit - Pro-climate vote: No - Their vote: Aye

• 19 Dec 2012: Vote

  Charities Act 2011 (Amendment) — Energy Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 17 Oct 2012: Vote

  Relationship, Drug and Alcohol Education (Curriculum) — New Clause 22 — Interpretation of the green purposes: duty to assess impact on the Climate Change Act 2008 - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 11 Jun 2012: Vote

  Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Sep 2011: Vote

  Prime Minister — Clause 42 — Domestic energy efficient regulations - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye

• 14 Sep 2011: Vote

  Prime Minister — New Clause 1 — Energy efficiency aim - Pro-climate vote: Aye - Their vote: Aye